Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BTLSX vs CEUFX
BTLSX vs CEUFX Comparison
Open Charts BTLSX vs CEUFX
Baillie Gifford Intl Concntr Gr EqsInstl
Price$8.65
Change-$0.84 (-8.85%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets94.67M
American Funds EUPAC 529-F-1
Price$62.64
Change-$1.74 (-2.70%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets134.63B
BTLSX vs CEUFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BTLSX vs. CEUFX commentary
Feb 05, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BTLSX is a Hold and CEUFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CEUFX has more cash in the bank: 135B vs. BTLSX (94.7M). CEUFX pays higher dividends than BTLSX: CEUFX (2.77) vs BTLSX (0.00). BTLSX was incepted earlier than CEUFX: BTLSX (8 years) vs CEUFX (23 years). BTLSX (0.99) is less costly to investors than CEUFX (0.91). CEUFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 35.00 vs. BTLSX (26.00). BTLSX has a lower initial minimum investment than CEUFX: BTLSX (0) vs CEUFX (250). CEUFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 18.33 vs. BTLSX (8.81). CEUFX return over 5 years is better than : -2.59 vs. BTLSX (-36.20).
| BTLSX | CEUFX | BTLSX / CEUFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.81 | 0.91 | 89% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.99 | 0.91 | 109% |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -1.705 | 5.668 | -30% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 94.7M | 135B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 2.77 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.81 | 18.33 | 48% |
| Returns for 3 years | 28.91 | 25.85 | 112% |
| Returns for 5 years | -36.20 | -2.59 | 1,396% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 78.47 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement