BTLLF
Price
$0.55
Change
+$0.01 (+1.85%)
Updated
Jun 26 closing price
Capitalization
27.27M
KSKGF
Price
$1.40
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Jun 17 closing price
Capitalization
213.73M
Interact to see
Advertisement

BTLLF vs KSKGF

Header iconBTLLF vs KSKGF Comparison
Open Charts BTLLF vs KSKGFBanner chart's image
North Peak Resources
Price$0.55
Change+$0.01 (+1.85%)
Volume$900
Capitalization27.27M
Kingsgate Consolidated
Price$1.40
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$875
Capitalization213.73M
BTLLF vs KSKGF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
BTLLF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
KSKGF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BTLLF vs. KSKGF commentary
Jun 30, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BTLLF is a Hold and KSKGF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 30, 2025
Stock price -- (BTLLF: $0.55 vs. KSKGF: $1.40)
Brand notoriety: BTLLF and KSKGF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Precious Metals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BTLLF: 15% vs. KSKGF: 10%
Market capitalization -- BTLLF: $27.27M vs. KSKGF: $213.73M
BTLLF [@Precious Metals] is valued at $27.27M. KSKGF’s [@Precious Metals] market capitalization is $213.73M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Precious Metals] industry ranges from $47.49B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Precious Metals] industry is $1.1B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BTLLF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileKSKGF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • BTLLF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • KSKGF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, KSKGF is a better buy in the long-term than BTLLF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BTLLF’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while KSKGF’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BTLLF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • KSKGF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 2 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, BTLLF is a better buy in the short-term than KSKGF.

Price Growth

BTLLF (@Precious Metals) experienced а +1.24% price change this week, while KSKGF (@Precious Metals) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Precious Metals industry was +0.06%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +9.36%, and the average quarterly price growth was +54.26%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Precious Metals (+0.06% weekly)

The Precious Metals industry is engaged in exploring/mining metals that are considered to be rare and/or have a high economic value. Popular precious metals include gold, platinum and silver - all three of which are largely used in jewelry, art and coinage alongwith having some industrial uses as well. Precious metals used in industrial processes include iridium, (used in specialty alloys), and palladium ( used in electronics and chemical applications). Historically, precious metals have traded at much higher prices than common industrial metals. Newmont Goldcorp Corp, Barrick Gold Corp and Freeport-McMoRan are few of the major precious metals producing companies in the U.S.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
KSKGF($214M) has a higher market cap than BTLLF($27.3M). KSKGF YTD gains are higher at: 77.215 vs. BTLLF (28.181). BTLLF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -2.75M vs. KSKGF (-32.95M). KSKGF has more cash in the bank: 15.6M vs. BTLLF (7.66M). BTLLF has less debt than KSKGF: BTLLF (49.7K) vs KSKGF (12.7M). KSKGF has higher revenues than BTLLF: KSKGF (176M) vs BTLLF (0).
BTLLFKSKGFBTLLF / KSKGF
Capitalization27.3M214M13%
EBITDA-2.75M-32.95M8%
Gain YTD28.18177.21536%
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
Revenue0176M-
Total Cash7.66M15.6M49%
Total Debt49.7K12.7M0%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BTLLF vs KSKGF: Fundamental Ratings
BTLLF
KSKGF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
92
Overvalued
47
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
9137
SMR RATING
1..100
9712
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4938
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
100100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

KSKGF's Valuation (47) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for BTLLF (92). This means that KSKGF’s stock grew somewhat faster than BTLLF’s over the last 12 months.

KSKGF's Profit vs Risk Rating (37) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for BTLLF (91). This means that KSKGF’s stock grew somewhat faster than BTLLF’s over the last 12 months.

KSKGF's SMR Rating (12) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for BTLLF (97). This means that KSKGF’s stock grew significantly faster than BTLLF’s over the last 12 months.

KSKGF's Price Growth Rating (38) in the null industry is in the same range as BTLLF (49). This means that KSKGF’s stock grew similarly to BTLLF’s over the last 12 months.

KSKGF's P/E Growth Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as BTLLF (100). This means that KSKGF’s stock grew similarly to BTLLF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BTLLFKSKGF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
70%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
81%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
73%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
86%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
67%
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
74%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
81%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
66%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
87%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
63%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
90%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
86%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
BTLLF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
KSKGF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
LGPSX37.480.23
+0.62%
ProFunds Large Cap Growth Svc
MIRTX34.350.20
+0.59%
MFS Massachusetts Investors Tr R2
TEMLX8.920.03
+0.34%
Nuveen Emerging Markets Eq R6
JOPPX51.790.06
+0.12%
Johnson Opportunity
GWEIX32.320.02
+0.06%
AMG GW&K Small Cap Core I

BTLLF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that BTLLF and KSKGF have been poorly correlated (+22% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that BTLLF and KSKGF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BTLLF
1D Price
Change %
BTLLF100%
N/A
KSKGF - BTLLF
22%
Poorly correlated
N/A
ELRRF - BTLLF
22%
Poorly correlated
+1.11%
CBGZF - BTLLF
15%
Poorly correlated
+3.38%
CAHPF - BTLLF
14%
Poorly correlated
-0.07%
BTUMF - BTLLF
13%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

KSKGF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that KSKGF and GRYCF have been poorly correlated (+24% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that KSKGF and GRYCF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To KSKGF
1D Price
Change %
KSKGF100%
N/A
GRYCF - KSKGF
24%
Poorly correlated
+5.59%
BTLLF - KSKGF
22%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CCHI - KSKGF
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
FSXLF - KSKGF
21%
Poorly correlated
-1.09%
MISVF - KSKGF
20%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More