Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BTLKX vs RERBX
BTLKX vs RERBX Comparison
Open Charts BTLKX vs RERBX
Baillie Gifford Intl Concntr Gr EqsK
Price$9.14
Change-$0.10 (-1.08%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets100.59M
American Funds EUPAC R2
Price$59.14
Change+$0.01 (+0.02%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets134.63B
BTLKX vs RERBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BTLKX vs. RERBX commentary
Jan 15, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BTLKX is a Hold and RERBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RERBX has more cash in the bank: 135B vs. BTLKX (101M). RERBX pays higher dividends than BTLKX: RERBX (2.39) vs BTLKX (0.00). BTLKX was incepted earlier than RERBX: BTLKX (8 years) vs RERBX (24 years). RERBX (1.56) is less costly to investors than BTLKX (0.90). RERBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 35.00 vs. BTLKX (26.00). RERBX has a lower initial minimum investment than BTLKX: RERBX (250) vs BTLKX (10000000). BTLKX (19.32) and RERBX (19.26) have marching annual gain over last year. RERBX return over 5 years is better than : -8.39 vs. BTLKX (-29.49).
| BTLKX | RERBX | BTLKX / RERBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.72 | 1.56 | 46% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.90 | 1.56 | 58% |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.123 | 4.377 | 49% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 10000000 | 250 | 4,000,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 101M | 135B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 2.39 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 19.32 | 19.26 | 100% |
| Returns for 3 years | 42.15 | 22.84 | 185% |
| Returns for 5 years | -29.49 | -8.39 | 351% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 55.12 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement