Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BTLKX vs CEUFX
BTLKX vs CEUFX Comparison
Open Charts BTLKX vs CEUFX
Baillie Gifford Intl Concntr Gr EqsK
Price$9.10
Change-$0.19 (-2.05%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets104.32M
American Funds EUPAC 529-F-1
Price$64.79
Change-$1.11 (-1.68%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets138.83B
BTLKX vs CEUFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BTLKX vs. CEUFX commentary
Nov 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BTLKX is a Hold and CEUFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CEUFX has more cash in the bank: 139B vs. BTLKX (104M). CEUFX pays higher dividends than BTLKX: CEUFX (0.76) vs BTLKX (0.00). BTLKX was incepted earlier than CEUFX: BTLKX (8 years) vs CEUFX (23 years). CEUFX (0.91) and BTLKX (0.90) have similar cost to investors . CEUFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 35.00 vs. BTLKX (26.00). CEUFX has a lower initial minimum investment than BTLKX: CEUFX (250) vs BTLKX (10000000). CEUFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 16.21 vs. BTLKX (13.75). CEUFX return over 5 years is better than : 10.69 vs. BTLKX (-58.42).
| BTLKX | CEUFX | BTLKX / CEUFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.72 | 0.91 | 79% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.90 | 0.91 | 99% |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 18.644 | 22.825 | 82% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 10000000 | 250 | 4,000,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 104M | 139B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.76 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 13.75 | 16.21 | 85% |
| Returns for 3 years | 43.61 | 37.93 | 115% |
| Returns for 5 years | -58.42 | 10.69 | -547% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 58.06 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement