Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BTLKX vs CEUFX
BTLKX vs CEUFX Comparison
Open Charts BTLKX vs CEUFX
Baillie Gifford Intl Concntr Gr EqsK
Price$9.14
Change-$0.10 (-1.08%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets100.59M
American Funds EUPAC 529-F-1
Price$61.90
Change+$0.01 (+0.02%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets134.63B
BTLKX vs CEUFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BTLKX vs. CEUFX commentary
Jan 15, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BTLKX is a Hold and CEUFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CEUFX has more cash in the bank: 135B vs. BTLKX (101M). CEUFX pays higher dividends than BTLKX: CEUFX (2.91) vs BTLKX (0.00). BTLKX was incepted earlier than CEUFX: BTLKX (8 years) vs CEUFX (23 years). CEUFX (0.91) and BTLKX (0.90) have similar cost to investors . CEUFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 35.00 vs. BTLKX (26.00). CEUFX has a lower initial minimum investment than BTLKX: CEUFX (250) vs BTLKX (10000000). CEUFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 20.92 vs. BTLKX (19.32). CEUFX return over 5 years is better than : -2.61 vs. BTLKX (-29.49).
| BTLKX | CEUFX | BTLKX / CEUFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.72 | 0.91 | 79% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.90 | 0.91 | 99% |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.123 | 4.420 | 48% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 10000000 | 250 | 4,000,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 101M | 135B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 2.91 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 19.32 | 20.92 | 92% |
| Returns for 3 years | 42.15 | 27.09 | 156% |
| Returns for 5 years | -29.49 | -2.61 | 1,130% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 76.10 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement