BTLCY
Price
$5.04
Change
+$0.01 (+0.20%)
Updated
Jul 3 closing price
Capitalization
4.03B
LNSPF
Price
$2.80
Change
+$0.07 (+2.56%)
Updated
Jun 30 closing price
Capitalization
2.34B
Interact to see
Advertisement

BTLCY vs LNSPF

Header iconBTLCY vs LNSPF Comparison
Open Charts BTLCY vs LNSPFBanner chart's image
British Land Company (The)
Price$5.04
Change+$0.01 (+0.20%)
Volume$7.48K
Capitalization4.03B
London & Stamford Property
Price$2.80
Change+$0.07 (+2.56%)
Volume$1.54K
Capitalization2.34B
BTLCY vs LNSPF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
BTLCY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
LNSPF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BTLCY vs. LNSPF commentary
Jul 06, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BTLCY is a Hold and LNSPF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 06, 2025
Stock price -- (BTLCY: $5.04 vs. LNSPF: $2.80)
Brand notoriety: BTLCY and LNSPF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BTLCY: 57% vs. LNSPF: 100%
Market capitalization -- BTLCY: $4.03B vs. LNSPF: $2.34B
BTLCY [@Real Estate Investment Trusts] is valued at $4.03B. LNSPF’s [@Real Estate Investment Trusts] market capitalization is $2.34B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Real Estate Investment Trusts] industry ranges from $243.79B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Real Estate Investment Trusts] industry is $5.44B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BTLCY’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileLNSPF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • BTLCY’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • LNSPF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, LNSPF is a better buy in the long-term than BTLCY.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BTLCY’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while LNSPF’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BTLCY’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • LNSPF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, LNSPF is a better buy in the short-term than BTLCY.

Price Growth

BTLCY (@Real Estate Investment Trusts) experienced а -3.45% price change this week, while LNSPF (@Real Estate Investment Trusts) price change was +2.36% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Real Estate Investment Trusts industry was +1.40%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.39%, and the average quarterly price growth was +1.74%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Real Estate Investment Trusts (+1.40% weekly)

A real estate investment trust (REIT) is a company any that owns, and in most cases, operates, income-producing real estate – ranging from office and apartment buildings to warehouses, hospitals, shopping centers, hotels and timberlands. Some REITs are involved in financing real estate. Equity REITs invest in and own properties, while mortgage REITs own and invest in property mortgages. REITs are required by law to pay out at least 90% of their annual taxable income (excluding capital gains) to shareholders in the form of dividends. Some REITs could be more cyclical than others; for example, when an economy is undergoing a recession, hotel REITs could be more vulnerable, compared to say healthcare REIT given that healthcare needs are less likely to depend on economic cycles. American Tower Corporation, Prologis, Inc. and Crown Castle International Corp are some of the biggest REIT companies in the U.S.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BTLCY($4.03B) has a higher market cap than LNSPF($2.34B). LNSPF has higher P/E ratio than BTLCY: LNSPF (7.23) vs BTLCY (5.85). LNSPF YTD gains are higher at: 24.151 vs. BTLCY (15.860). LNSPF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -477.5M vs. BTLCY (-944M). BTLCY has more cash in the bank: 125M vs. LNSPF (23.9M). LNSPF has less debt than BTLCY: LNSPF (1.02B) vs BTLCY (2.39B). BTLCY has higher revenues than LNSPF: BTLCY (418M) vs LNSPF (147M).
BTLCYLNSPFBTLCY / LNSPF
Capitalization4.03B2.34B172%
EBITDA-944M-477.5M198%
Gain YTD15.86024.15166%
P/E Ratio5.857.2381%
Revenue418M147M284%
Total Cash125M23.9M523%
Total Debt2.39B1.02B235%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BTLCY vs LNSPF: Fundamental Ratings
BTLCY
LNSPF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
1650
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
70
Overvalued
79
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
8481
SMR RATING
1..100
9393
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5246
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
9591
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a30

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

BTLCY's Valuation (70) in the null industry is in the same range as LNSPF (79). This means that BTLCY’s stock grew similarly to LNSPF’s over the last 12 months.

LNSPF's Profit vs Risk Rating (81) in the null industry is in the same range as BTLCY (84). This means that LNSPF’s stock grew similarly to BTLCY’s over the last 12 months.

LNSPF's SMR Rating (93) in the null industry is in the same range as BTLCY (93). This means that LNSPF’s stock grew similarly to BTLCY’s over the last 12 months.

LNSPF's Price Growth Rating (46) in the null industry is in the same range as BTLCY (52). This means that LNSPF’s stock grew similarly to BTLCY’s over the last 12 months.

LNSPF's P/E Growth Rating (91) in the null industry is in the same range as BTLCY (95). This means that LNSPF’s stock grew similarly to BTLCY’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BTLCYLNSPF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
32%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
67%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
47%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
69%
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
71%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
49%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
68%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
43%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
66%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
40%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 27 days ago
66%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
65%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
33%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
65%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
35%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
BTLCY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
LNSPF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
RSEGX54.640.77
+1.43%
Victory RS Small Cap Growth A
JLGMX89.410.94
+1.06%
JPMorgan Large Cap Growth R6
FVADX61.780.53
+0.87%
Franklin Small Cap Value Adv
ACSMX11.450.09
+0.79%
Advisors Capital Small/Mid Cap
EIVPX16.060.04
+0.25%
Parametric Volatil Risk Prm-Defensv I

BTLCY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BTLCY has been loosely correlated with RIOCF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 47% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if BTLCY jumps, then RIOCF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BTLCY
1D Price
Change %
BTLCY100%
+0.20%
RIOCF - BTLCY
47%
Loosely correlated
+0.33%
HRUFF - BTLCY
40%
Loosely correlated
N/A
APYRF - BTLCY
38%
Loosely correlated
N/A
BYLOF - BTLCY
36%
Loosely correlated
-0.95%
ARESF - BTLCY
34%
Loosely correlated
N/A
More

LNSPF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LNSPF has been loosely correlated with MAPIF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 36% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if LNSPF jumps, then MAPIF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To LNSPF
1D Price
Change %
LNSPF100%
N/A
MAPIF - LNSPF
36%
Loosely correlated
N/A
CHTH - LNSPF
32%
Poorly correlated
N/A
BTLCY - LNSPF
26%
Poorly correlated
+0.20%
UTGPF - LNSPF
26%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CGIUF - LNSPF
23%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More