BTLCY
Price
$5.04
Change
+$0.01 (+0.20%)
Updated
Jul 3 closing price
Capitalization
4.03B
HRUFF
Price
$7.83
Change
-$0.07 (-0.89%)
Updated
Jul 2 closing price
Capitalization
2.07B
Interact to see
Advertisement

BTLCY vs HRUFF

Header iconBTLCY vs HRUFF Comparison
Open Charts BTLCY vs HRUFFBanner chart's image
British Land Company (The)
Price$5.04
Change+$0.01 (+0.20%)
Volume$7.48K
Capitalization4.03B
H & R Real Estate Investment Trust
Price$7.83
Change-$0.07 (-0.89%)
Volume$208.76K
Capitalization2.07B
BTLCY vs HRUFF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
BTLCY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
HRUFF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BTLCY vs. HRUFF commentary
Jul 08, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BTLCY is a Hold and HRUFF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 08, 2025
Stock price -- (BTLCY: $5.04 vs. HRUFF: $7.83)
Brand notoriety: BTLCY and HRUFF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BTLCY: 57% vs. HRUFF: 364%
Market capitalization -- BTLCY: $4.03B vs. HRUFF: $2.07B
BTLCY [@Real Estate Investment Trusts] is valued at $4.03B. HRUFF’s [@Real Estate Investment Trusts] market capitalization is $2.07B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Real Estate Investment Trusts] industry ranges from $243.79B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Real Estate Investment Trusts] industry is $5.44B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BTLCY’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileHRUFF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • BTLCY’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • HRUFF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, HRUFF is a better buy in the long-term than BTLCY.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BTLCY’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while HRUFF’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BTLCY’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • HRUFF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, HRUFF is a better buy in the short-term than BTLCY.

Price Growth

BTLCY (@Real Estate Investment Trusts) experienced а -3.45% price change this week, while HRUFF (@Real Estate Investment Trusts) price change was -0.89% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Real Estate Investment Trusts industry was +1.28%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.41%, and the average quarterly price growth was +3.40%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Real Estate Investment Trusts (+1.28% weekly)

A real estate investment trust (REIT) is a company any that owns, and in most cases, operates, income-producing real estate – ranging from office and apartment buildings to warehouses, hospitals, shopping centers, hotels and timberlands. Some REITs are involved in financing real estate. Equity REITs invest in and own properties, while mortgage REITs own and invest in property mortgages. REITs are required by law to pay out at least 90% of their annual taxable income (excluding capital gains) to shareholders in the form of dividends. Some REITs could be more cyclical than others; for example, when an economy is undergoing a recession, hotel REITs could be more vulnerable, compared to say healthcare REIT given that healthcare needs are less likely to depend on economic cycles. American Tower Corporation, Prologis, Inc. and Crown Castle International Corp are some of the biggest REIT companies in the U.S.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BTLCY($4.03B) has a higher market cap than HRUFF($2.07B). HRUFF has higher P/E ratio than BTLCY: HRUFF (232.56) vs BTLCY (5.85). HRUFF YTD gains are higher at: 21.020 vs. BTLCY (15.860). HRUFF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 111M vs. BTLCY (-944M). BTLCY has more cash in the bank: 125M vs. HRUFF (68.4M). BTLCY has less debt than HRUFF: BTLCY (2.39B) vs HRUFF (3.97B). HRUFF has higher revenues than BTLCY: HRUFF (851M) vs BTLCY (418M).
BTLCYHRUFFBTLCY / HRUFF
Capitalization4.03B2.07B195%
EBITDA-944M111M-850%
Gain YTD15.86021.02075%
P/E Ratio5.85232.563%
Revenue418M851M49%
Total Cash125M68.4M183%
Total Debt2.39B3.97B60%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BTLCY vs HRUFF: Fundamental Ratings
BTLCY
HRUFF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
70
Overvalued
45
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
8470
SMR RATING
1..100
9391
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5249
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
952
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

HRUFF's Valuation (45) in the null industry is in the same range as BTLCY (70). This means that HRUFF’s stock grew similarly to BTLCY’s over the last 12 months.

HRUFF's Profit vs Risk Rating (70) in the null industry is in the same range as BTLCY (84). This means that HRUFF’s stock grew similarly to BTLCY’s over the last 12 months.

HRUFF's SMR Rating (91) in the null industry is in the same range as BTLCY (93). This means that HRUFF’s stock grew similarly to BTLCY’s over the last 12 months.

HRUFF's Price Growth Rating (49) in the null industry is in the same range as BTLCY (52). This means that HRUFF’s stock grew similarly to BTLCY’s over the last 12 months.

HRUFF's P/E Growth Rating (2) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for BTLCY (95). This means that HRUFF’s stock grew significantly faster than BTLCY’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BTLCYHRUFF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
39%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
67%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
61%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
69%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
49%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
71%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
68%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
68%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
55%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
66%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
52%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 28 days ago
66%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
65%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
65%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
49%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
BTLCY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
HRUFF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
AZBAX22.960.28
+1.23%
Virtus Small-Cap A
FDGRX42.440.44
+1.05%
Fidelity Growth Company Fund
FDCPX111.980.95
+0.86%
Fidelity Select Tech Hardware
MMFYX17.050.10
+0.59%
MassMutual Equity Opports Svc
SEFCX13.560.04
+0.30%
SEI International Equity Y (SIT)

BTLCY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BTLCY has been loosely correlated with RIOCF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 47% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if BTLCY jumps, then RIOCF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BTLCY
1D Price
Change %
BTLCY100%
+0.20%
RIOCF - BTLCY
47%
Loosely correlated
+0.33%
HRUFF - BTLCY
40%
Loosely correlated
N/A
APYRF - BTLCY
38%
Loosely correlated
N/A
BYLOF - BTLCY
36%
Loosely correlated
-0.95%
ARESF - BTLCY
34%
Loosely correlated
N/A
More

HRUFF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, HRUFF has been loosely correlated with RIOCF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 54% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if HRUFF jumps, then RIOCF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To HRUFF
1D Price
Change %
HRUFF100%
N/A
RIOCF - HRUFF
54%
Loosely correlated
+0.33%
APYRF - HRUFF
47%
Loosely correlated
N/A
NWHUF - HRUFF
44%
Loosely correlated
+0.27%
DREUF - HRUFF
40%
Loosely correlated
-0.69%
BTLCY - HRUFF
39%
Loosely correlated
+0.20%
More