BTGOF
Price
$2.38
Change
+$0.03 (+1.28%)
Updated
Dec 11 closing price
Capitalization
22.96B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
RCIAF
Price
$38.30
Change
-$0.49 (-1.26%)
Updated
Dec 5 closing price
Capitalization
19.57B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

BTGOF vs RCIAF

Header iconBTGOF vs RCIAF Comparison
Open Charts BTGOF vs RCIAFBanner chart's image
BT Group
Price$2.38
Change+$0.03 (+1.28%)
Volume$8.6K
Capitalization22.96B
Rogers Communications
Price$38.30
Change-$0.49 (-1.26%)
Volume$101
Capitalization19.57B
BTGOF vs RCIAF Comparison Chart in %
BTGOF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
RCIAF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BTGOF vs. RCIAF commentary
Dec 13, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BTGOF is a Hold and RCIAF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Dec 13, 2025
Stock price -- (BTGOF: $2.38 vs. RCIAF: $38.30)
Brand notoriety: BTGOF and RCIAF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Major Telecommunications industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BTGOF: 25% vs. RCIAF: 7%
Market capitalization -- BTGOF: $22.96B vs. RCIAF: $19.57B
BTGOF [@Major Telecommunications] is valued at $22.96B. RCIAF’s [@Major Telecommunications] market capitalization is $19.57B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Major Telecommunications] industry ranges from $218.48B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Major Telecommunications] industry is $18.75B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BTGOF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileRCIAF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • BTGOF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • RCIAF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, both BTGOF and RCIAF are a bad buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BTGOF’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while RCIAF’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BTGOF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • RCIAF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, BTGOF is a better buy in the short-term than RCIAF.

Price Growth

BTGOF (@Major Telecommunications) experienced а -1.04% price change this week, while RCIAF (@Major Telecommunications) price change was -1.26% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Major Telecommunications industry was +1.06%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.83%, and the average quarterly price growth was +19.05%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Major Telecommunications (+1.06% weekly)

Major telecommunications include companies that make communication possible across the globe – by providing voice and data transmission via multiple channels such as phone or the Internet, through airwaves or cables, through wires or wirelessly. The ease with which we connect with anyone, anywhere in the world is thanks in large part to the infrastructure created by the telecom industry. Some major telecom players include AT&T Inc., Verizon Communications Inc. and Nippon Telegraph and Telephone Corporation.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BTGOF($23B) has a higher market cap than RCIAF($19.6B). BTGOF has higher P/E ratio than RCIAF: BTGOF (18.48) vs RCIAF (4.24). BTGOF YTD gains are higher at: 33.727 vs. RCIAF (16.061). RCIAF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 9.01B vs. BTGOF (7.47B). RCIAF has more cash in the bank: 6.96B vs. BTGOF (2.81B). BTGOF has less debt than RCIAF: BTGOF (23.3B) vs RCIAF (45.4B). RCIAF (20.8B) and BTGOF (20.4B) have equivalent revenues.
BTGOFRCIAFBTGOF / RCIAF
Capitalization23B19.6B117%
EBITDA7.47B9.01B83%
Gain YTD33.72716.061210%
P/E Ratio18.484.24436%
Revenue20.4B20.8B98%
Total Cash2.81B6.96B40%
Total Debt23.3B45.4B51%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BTGOF vs RCIAF: Fundamental Ratings
BTGOF
RCIAF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
7497
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
35
Fair valued
45
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
68100
SMR RATING
1..100
9856
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5850
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
4599
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

BTGOF's Valuation (35) in the null industry is in the same range as RCIAF (45). This means that BTGOF’s stock grew similarly to RCIAF’s over the last 12 months.

BTGOF's Profit vs Risk Rating (68) in the null industry is in the same range as RCIAF (100). This means that BTGOF’s stock grew similarly to RCIAF’s over the last 12 months.

RCIAF's SMR Rating (56) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for BTGOF (98). This means that RCIAF’s stock grew somewhat faster than BTGOF’s over the last 12 months.

RCIAF's Price Growth Rating (50) in the null industry is in the same range as BTGOF (58). This means that RCIAF’s stock grew similarly to BTGOF’s over the last 12 months.

BTGOF's P/E Growth Rating (45) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for RCIAF (99). This means that BTGOF’s stock grew somewhat faster than RCIAF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BTGOFRCIAF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
65%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
31%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
77%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
29%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
65%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
22%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
60%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
13%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
69%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
34%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
81%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
38%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 9 days ago
63%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
71%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
57%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
83%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
22%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
BTGOF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
RCIAF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
IDEV83.390.50
+0.60%
iShares Core MSCI Intl Dev Mkts ETF
IDEC32.160.13
+0.42%
Innovator Intl Dev Pwr Bffr ETF - Dec
SPE15.400.06
+0.40%
Special Opportunities Fund
TLTP22.310.04
+0.18%
Amplify TLT U.S. Trs 12% Opt Inc ETF
XBIL50.130.01
+0.02%
F/m US Treasury 6 Month Bill ETF

BTGOF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that BTGOF and VOD have been poorly correlated (+23% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that BTGOF and VOD's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BTGOF
1D Price
Change %
BTGOF100%
+1.06%
VOD - BTGOF
23%
Poorly correlated
-0.16%
TLSNY - BTGOF
23%
Poorly correlated
+0.50%
TLTZY - BTGOF
23%
Poorly correlated
+0.17%
VODPF - BTGOF
23%
Poorly correlated
+2.63%
TELNY - BTGOF
21%
Poorly correlated
+0.49%
More

RCIAF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, RCIAF has been loosely correlated with TLSNF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 36% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if RCIAF jumps, then TLSNF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To RCIAF
1D Price
Change %
RCIAF100%
N/A
TLSNF - RCIAF
36%
Loosely correlated
N/A
FNCTF - RCIAF
26%
Poorly correlated
N/A
QBCRF - RCIAF
4%
Poorly correlated
-0.41%
SCMWY - RCIAF
4%
Poorly correlated
+1.13%
SGAPY - RCIAF
0%
Poorly correlated
+0.16%
More