BTGOF
Price
$2.46
Change
-$0.04 (-1.60%)
Updated
Jan 14 closing price
Capitalization
23.59B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
CGEAF
Price
$48.78
Change
-$0.02 (-0.04%)
Updated
Jan 13 closing price
Capitalization
2.07B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

BTGOF vs CGEAF

Header iconBTGOF vs CGEAF Comparison
Open Charts BTGOF vs CGEAFBanner chart's image
BT Group
Price$2.46
Change-$0.04 (-1.60%)
Volume$8.09K
Capitalization23.59B
Cogeco Communications
Price$48.78
Change-$0.02 (-0.04%)
Volume$31.3K
Capitalization2.07B
BTGOF vs CGEAF Comparison Chart in %
BTGOF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
CGEAF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BTGOF vs. CGEAF commentary
Jan 15, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BTGOF is a Hold and CGEAF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jan 15, 2026
Stock price -- (BTGOF: $2.46 vs. CGEAF: $48.78)
Brand notoriety: BTGOF and CGEAF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Major Telecommunications industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BTGOF: 60% vs. CGEAF: 401%
Market capitalization -- BTGOF: $23.59B vs. CGEAF: $2.07B
BTGOF [@Major Telecommunications] is valued at $23.59B. CGEAF’s [@Major Telecommunications] market capitalization is $2.07B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Major Telecommunications] industry ranges from $214.78B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Major Telecommunications] industry is $18.86B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BTGOF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileCGEAF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • BTGOF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • CGEAF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, BTGOF is a better buy in the long-term than CGEAF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BTGOF’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while CGEAF’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BTGOF’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • CGEAF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, BTGOF is a better buy in the short-term than CGEAF.

Price Growth

BTGOF (@Major Telecommunications) experienced а +2.93% price change this week, while CGEAF (@Major Telecommunications) price change was -0.05% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Major Telecommunications industry was +0.51%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.18%, and the average quarterly price growth was +13.57%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Major Telecommunications (+0.51% weekly)

Major telecommunications include companies that make communication possible across the globe – by providing voice and data transmission via multiple channels such as phone or the Internet, through airwaves or cables, through wires or wirelessly. The ease with which we connect with anyone, anywhere in the world is thanks in large part to the infrastructure created by the telecom industry. Some major telecom players include AT&T Inc., Verizon Communications Inc. and Nippon Telegraph and Telephone Corporation.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BTGOF($23.6B) has a higher market cap than CGEAF($2.07B). BTGOF has higher P/E ratio than CGEAF: BTGOF (19.09) vs CGEAF (8.91). BTGOF YTD gains are higher at: 2.929 vs. CGEAF (1.184). BTGOF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 7.28B vs. CGEAF (1.42B). BTGOF has more cash in the bank: 1.99B vs. CGEAF (245M). CGEAF has less debt than BTGOF: CGEAF (4.78B) vs BTGOF (23.9B). BTGOF has higher revenues than CGEAF: BTGOF (20.1B) vs CGEAF (2.95B).
BTGOFCGEAFBTGOF / CGEAF
Capitalization23.6B2.07B1,138%
EBITDA7.28B1.42B513%
Gain YTD2.9291.184247%
P/E Ratio19.098.91214%
Revenue20.1B2.95B681%
Total Cash1.99B245M812%
Total Debt23.9B4.78B500%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BTGOF vs CGEAF: Fundamental Ratings
BTGOF
CGEAF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
2132
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
33
Fair valued
26
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
72100
SMR RATING
1..100
9995
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4855
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
3934
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

CGEAF's Valuation (26) in the null industry is in the same range as BTGOF (33). This means that CGEAF’s stock grew similarly to BTGOF’s over the last 12 months.

BTGOF's Profit vs Risk Rating (72) in the null industry is in the same range as CGEAF (100). This means that BTGOF’s stock grew similarly to CGEAF’s over the last 12 months.

CGEAF's SMR Rating (95) in the null industry is in the same range as BTGOF (99). This means that CGEAF’s stock grew similarly to BTGOF’s over the last 12 months.

BTGOF's Price Growth Rating (48) in the null industry is in the same range as CGEAF (55). This means that BTGOF’s stock grew similarly to CGEAF’s over the last 12 months.

CGEAF's P/E Growth Rating (34) in the null industry is in the same range as BTGOF (39). This means that CGEAF’s stock grew similarly to BTGOF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BTGOFCGEAF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
39%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
75%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
40%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
71%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
36%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
71%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
50%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
70%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
44%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
72%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
34%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
63%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 24 days ago
72%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
74%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
31%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
68%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
46%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
BTGOF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
CGEAF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
OPPJ50.340.19
+0.37%
WisdomTree Japan Opportunities ETF
HAIL36.760.10
+0.26%
Stt Strt® SPDR®S&PKenshoSmrtMbltyETF
FLIA20.270.03
+0.15%
Franklin International Aggregate Bd ETF
FXF110.490.07
+0.06%
Invesco CurrencyShares® Swiss Franc
ESGV121.81-0.88
-0.72%
Vanguard ESG US Stock ETF

BTGOF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that BTGOF and VOD have been poorly correlated (+23% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that BTGOF and VOD's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BTGOF
1D Price
Change %
BTGOF100%
-1.60%
VOD - BTGOF
23%
Poorly correlated
+1.44%
TLSNY - BTGOF
23%
Poorly correlated
+3.25%
TLTZY - BTGOF
23%
Poorly correlated
+1.74%
VODPF - BTGOF
23%
Poorly correlated
N/A
TELNY - BTGOF
21%
Poorly correlated
+0.64%
More

CGEAF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CGEAF and CGECF have been poorly correlated (+29% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CGEAF and CGECF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CGEAF
1D Price
Change %
CGEAF100%
N/A
CGECF - CGEAF
29%
Poorly correlated
+1.43%
CVHSY - CGEAF
12%
Poorly correlated
-10.89%
BGAOY - CGEAF
6%
Poorly correlated
-3.93%
BTGOF - CGEAF
3%
Poorly correlated
-1.60%
BZQIF - CGEAF
3%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More