BTGHF
Price
$0.13
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Apr 14 closing price
Capitalization
182M
RSASF
Price
$0.20
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Jun 16 closing price
Capitalization
9.38M
Interact to see
Advertisement

BTGHF vs RSASF

Header iconBTGHF vs RSASF Comparison
Open Charts BTGHF vs RSASFBanner chart's image
BIGTINCAN
Price$0.13
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$396
Capitalization182M
RESAAS Services
Price$0.20
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$200
Capitalization9.38M
BTGHF vs RSASF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
RSASF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BTGHF vs. RSASF commentary
Jun 30, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BTGHF is a Hold and RSASF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 30, 2025
Stock price -- (BTGHF: $0.13 vs. RSASF: $0.20)
Brand notoriety: BTGHF and RSASF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Packaged Software industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BTGHF: 100% vs. RSASF: 6%
Market capitalization -- BTGHF: $182M vs. RSASF: $9.38M
BTGHF [@Packaged Software] is valued at $182M. RSASF’s [@Packaged Software] market capitalization is $9.38M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Packaged Software] industry ranges from $3.15T to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Packaged Software] industry is $12.72B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BTGHF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileRSASF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • BTGHF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • RSASF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, BTGHF is a better buy in the long-term than RSASF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

RSASF’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • RSASF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 3 bearish.

Price Growth

BTGHF (@Packaged Software) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while RSASF (@Packaged Software) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Packaged Software industry was +3.15%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +5.92%, and the average quarterly price growth was +34.84%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Packaged Software (+3.15% weekly)

Packaged software comprises multiple software programs bundled together and sold as a group. For example, Microsoft Office includes multiple applications such as Excel, Word, and PowerPoint. In some cases, buying a bundled product is cheaper than purchasing each item individually[s20] . Microsoft Corporation, Oracle Corp. and Adobe are some major American packaged software makers.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BTGHF($182M) has a higher market cap than RSASF($9.38M). RSASF YTD gains are higher at: 17.706 vs. BTGHF (14.740). RSASF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -2.01M vs. BTGHF (-26.56M). BTGHF has more cash in the bank: 71.4M vs. RSASF (54.5K). RSASF has less debt than BTGHF: RSASF (396K) vs BTGHF (2.08M). BTGHF has higher revenues than RSASF: BTGHF (122M) vs RSASF (365K).
BTGHFRSASFBTGHF / RSASF
Capitalization182M9.38M1,941%
EBITDA-26.56M-2.01M1,321%
Gain YTD14.74017.70683%
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
Revenue122M365K33,425%
Total Cash71.4M54.5K131,009%
Total Debt2.08M396K524%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
RSASF: Fundamental Ratings
RSASF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
50
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
84
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
95
SMR RATING
1..100
100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
61
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BTGHFRSASF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
68%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
79%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
74%
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
81%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
50%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
74%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
38%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
73%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
83%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
RSASF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
KYKOF14.95N/A
N/A
Kyowa Hakko Kogyo Co., Ltd.
PYTCF4.80N/A
N/A
Playtech PLC
PRVFF3.77N/A
N/A
PRO REAL ESTATE INVT TR
AZZTF0.15N/A
-0.71%
Aztec Minerals Corp
GLASF5.63-0.21
-3.60%
Glass House Brands Inc.

BTGHF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BTGHF has been loosely correlated with RMDEF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 47% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if BTGHF jumps, then RMDEF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BTGHF
1D Price
Change %
BTGHF100%
N/A
RMDEF - BTGHF
47%
Loosely correlated
N/A
WTCHF - BTGHF
30%
Poorly correlated
-1.72%
SMSI - BTGHF
22%
Poorly correlated
-3.89%
LSPKF - BTGHF
20%
Poorly correlated
N/A
RSASF - BTGHF
20%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

RSASF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, RSASF has been loosely correlated with RMDEF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 34% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if RSASF jumps, then RMDEF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To RSASF
1D Price
Change %
RSASF100%
N/A
RMDEF - RSASF
34%
Loosely correlated
N/A
AILQF - RSASF
24%
Poorly correlated
N/A
ROWKF - RSASF
22%
Poorly correlated
N/A
BTGHF - RSASF
20%
Poorly correlated
N/A
EVH - RSASF
20%
Poorly correlated
+4.20%
More