BTGGF
Price
$63.22
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Nov 8 closing price
TRIN
Price
$14.16
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Nov 14 closing price
103 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

BTGGF vs TRIN

Header iconBTGGF vs TRIN Comparison
Open Charts BTGGF vs TRINBanner chart's image
Bitcoin Group SE
Price$63.22
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$15.49K
CapitalizationN/A
Trinity Capital
Price$14.16
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$377K
CapitalizationN/A
BTGGF vs TRIN Comparison Chart
Loading...
TRIN
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BTGGF vs. TRIN commentary
Nov 16, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BTGGF is a Hold and TRIN is a Buy.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Nov 16, 2024
Stock price -- (BTGGF: $63.22 vs. TRIN: $14.16)
Brand notoriety: BTGGF and TRIN are both not notable
Both companies represent the Investment Managers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BTGGF: 906% vs. TRIN: 68%
Market capitalization -- BTGGF: $118.22M vs. TRIN: $672.87M
BTGGF [@Investment Managers] is valued at $118.22M. TRIN’s [@Investment Managers] market capitalization is $672.87M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Managers] industry ranges from $124.17B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Managers] industry is $5.91B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BTGGF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileTRIN’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • BTGGF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • TRIN’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, BTGGF is a better buy in the long-term than TRIN.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

TRIN’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • TRIN’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 2 bearish.

Price Growth

BTGGF (@Investment Managers) experienced а +3.36% price change this week, while TRIN (@Investment Managers) price change was +3.89% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Managers industry was +0.71%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.02%, and the average quarterly price growth was +5.28%.

Reported Earning Dates

TRIN is expected to report earnings on Feb 27, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Managers (+0.71% weekly)

Investment Managers manage financial assets and other investments of clients. Management includes designing a short- or long-term strategy for buying/holding and selling of portfolio holdings. It can also include tax services and other aspects of financial planning as well. While it is perceived that the industry is faced with growing competition from robo-advisors/digital platforms and passive/ index-tracking funds, many investors still find value in actively managed in-person services that investment management companies often emphasize on. At the same time, many wealth managers are also incorporating digital initiatives/low cost options in addition to their in-person customized services. Their main sources of revenues are fees as a percentage of assets under management, in addition to a certain portion of clients’ gains from asset appreciation. BlackRock, Inc., Blackstone Group Inc and Brookfield Asset Management are some of the major investment management companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TRIN($673M) has a higher market cap than BTGGF($118M). BTGGF has higher P/E ratio than TRIN: BTGGF (101.01) vs TRIN (7.67). BTGGF YTD gains are higher at: 125.778 vs. TRIN (8.504). BTGGF has more cash in the bank: 20.3M vs. TRIN (707K). BTGGF has less debt than TRIN: BTGGF (506K) vs TRIN (640M). TRIN has higher revenues than BTGGF: TRIN (125M) vs BTGGF (25.4M).
BTGGFTRINBTGGF / TRIN
Capitalization118M673M18%
EBITDA19.9MN/A-
Gain YTD125.7788.5041,479%
P/E Ratio101.017.671,318%
Revenue25.4M125M20%
Total Cash20.3M707K2,871%
Total Debt506K640M0%
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
TRIN
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
49%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
60%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
55%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
56%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
55%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
53%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
47%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
66%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
TRIN
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
GME27.370.91
+3.44%
GameStop Corp
AAPL228.223.10
+1.38%
Apple
SPY593.35-3.84
-0.64%
SPDR® S&P 500® ETF Trust
BTC.X87250.430000-3333.734400
-3.68%
Bitcoin cryptocurrency
TSLA311.18-19.06
-5.77%
Tesla

BTGGF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that BTGGF and CYMBF have been poorly correlated (+31% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that BTGGF and CYMBF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BTGGF
1D Price
Change %
BTGGF100%
N/A
CYMBF - BTGGF
31%
Poorly correlated
N/A
FSEN - BTGGF
14%
Poorly correlated
N/A
EATBF - BTGGF
11%
Poorly correlated
+8.00%
TRIN - BTGGF
7%
Poorly correlated
-0.28%
SSSS - BTGGF
4%
Poorly correlated
+5.89%
More

TRIN and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, TRIN has been loosely correlated with ARCC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 53% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if TRIN jumps, then ARCC could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To TRIN
1D Price
Change %
TRIN100%
-0.28%
ARCC - TRIN
53%
Loosely correlated
+0.19%
FSK - TRIN
52%
Loosely correlated
-0.19%
PFLT - TRIN
51%
Loosely correlated
-0.72%
MAIN - TRIN
50%
Loosely correlated
-0.13%
PNNT - TRIN
50%
Loosely correlated
-0.57%
More