Advertisement
BTDPY vs UHG
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BTDPY is a Hold and UHG is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
BTDPY’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileUHG’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
- BTDPY’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- UHG’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
BTDPY’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while UHG’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
- BTDPY’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
- UHG’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
Price Growth
BTDPY (@Homebuilding) experienced а -4.02% price change this week, while UHG (@Homebuilding) price change was -4.79% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Homebuilding industry was +7.09%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.27%, and the average quarterly price growth was +7.02%.
Industries' Descriptions
@Homebuilding (+7.09% weekly)Homebuilding includes companies residential home construction companies, renovators and repair firms. The companies may be building single-family or multifamily homes, condominiums or mobile homes. Over the five years to 2019, the Home Builders industry is estimated to have grown at an annualized rate of 2.5% to reach $89.4 billion, (including expected growth of 2.6% in 2019), according to a study by IbisWorld. After having suffered one of its worst crises a decade ago during the last macroeconomic recession–which had much of its origins in U.S. real estate – the homebuilding industry has been recovering steadily so far. Higher disposable incomes and improving economic activity have bolstered consumers’ purchases of homes. While revenue of the Home Builders industry remains well below its prerecession high, demand growth estimates show promise.
| BTDPY | UHG | BTDPY / UHG | |
| Capitalization | 7.16B | 93.5M | 7,661% |
| EBITDA | 379M | 2.67M | 14,221% |
| Gain YTD | -4.653 | 1.923 | -242% |
| P/E Ratio | 28.11 | 25.80 | 109% |
| Revenue | 5.58B | 418M | 1,334% |
| Total Cash | N/A | 25.6M | - |
| Total Debt | N/A | 149M | - |
BTDPY | ||
|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 25 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 11 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 90 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 51 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 77 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
| BTDPY | UHG | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | 1 day ago 46% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 75% | 1 day ago 44% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 73% | N/A |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 71% | N/A |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 69% | 1 day ago 58% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 57% | 1 day ago 45% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 16 days ago 59% | 11 days ago 70% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | N/A | 1 day ago 68% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 71% | 1 day ago 47% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 60% | 1 day ago 33% |
Advertisement
BTDPY and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BTDPY has been closely correlated with PSMMY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 69% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if BTDPY jumps, then PSMMY could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To BTDPY | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BTDPY | 100% | -3.28% | ||
| PSMMY - BTDPY | 69% Closely correlated | -2.01% | ||
| PHM - BTDPY | 50% Loosely correlated | -2.19% | ||
| TMHC - BTDPY | 49% Loosely correlated | -2.73% | ||
| TPH - BTDPY | 48% Loosely correlated | -1.57% | ||
| MHO - BTDPY | 48% Loosely correlated | -2.10% | ||
More | ||||
UHG and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that UHG and BTDPY have been poorly correlated (+23% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that UHG and BTDPY's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To UHG | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| UHG | 100% | -3.64% | ||
| BTDPY - UHG | 23% Poorly correlated | -3.28% | ||
| TPH - UHG | 22% Poorly correlated | -1.57% | ||
| PSMMY - UHG | 22% Poorly correlated | -2.01% | ||
| LEN - UHG | 22% Poorly correlated | -1.57% | ||
| KBH - UHG | 22% Poorly correlated | -1.52% | ||
More | ||||