BTDPY
Price
$12.01
Change
+$0.05 (+0.42%)
Updated
Jul 3 closing price
Capitalization
5.85B
PSMMY
Price
$33.89
Change
+$0.33 (+0.98%)
Updated
Jul 3 closing price
Capitalization
4.76B
Interact to see
Advertisement

BTDPY vs PSMMY

Header iconBTDPY vs PSMMY Comparison
Open Charts BTDPY vs PSMMYBanner chart's image
BARRATT REDROW
Price$12.01
Change+$0.05 (+0.42%)
Volume$48.88K
Capitalization5.85B
Persimmon
Price$33.89
Change+$0.33 (+0.98%)
Volume$4.67K
Capitalization4.76B
BTDPY vs PSMMY Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
BTDPY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
PSMMY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BTDPY vs. PSMMY commentary
Jul 07, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BTDPY is a Hold and PSMMY is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 07, 2025
Stock price -- (BTDPY: $12.01 vs. PSMMY: $33.89)
Brand notoriety: BTDPY and PSMMY are both not notable
Both companies represent the Homebuilding industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BTDPY: 209% vs. PSMMY: 52%
Market capitalization -- BTDPY: $5.85B vs. PSMMY: $4.76B
BTDPY [@Homebuilding] is valued at $5.85B. PSMMY’s [@Homebuilding] market capitalization is $4.76B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Homebuilding] industry ranges from $53.71B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Homebuilding] industry is $7.78B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BTDPY’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whilePSMMY’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • BTDPY’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • PSMMY’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, both BTDPY and PSMMY are a bad buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BTDPY’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while PSMMY’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BTDPY’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • PSMMY’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, PSMMY is a better buy in the short-term than BTDPY.

Price Growth

BTDPY (@Homebuilding) experienced а -7.30% price change this week, while PSMMY (@Homebuilding) price change was -8.41% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Homebuilding industry was +0.60%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +5.10%, and the average quarterly price growth was +3.25%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Homebuilding (+0.60% weekly)

Homebuilding includes companies residential home construction companies, renovators and repair firms. The companies may be building single-family or multifamily homes, condominiums or mobile homes. Over the five years to 2019, the Home Builders industry is estimated to have grown at an annualized rate of 2.5% to reach $89.4 billion, (including expected growth of 2.6% in 2019), according to a study by IbisWorld. After having suffered one of its worst crises a decade ago during the last macroeconomic recession–which had much of its origins in U.S. real estate – the homebuilding industry has been recovering steadily so far. Higher disposable incomes and improving economic activity have bolstered consumers’ purchases of homes. While revenue of the Home Builders industry remains well below its prerecession high, demand growth estimates show promise.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BTDPY($5.85B) has a higher market cap than PSMMY($4.76B). BTDPY has higher P/E ratio than PSMMY: BTDPY (21.53) vs PSMMY (6.57). PSMMY YTD gains are higher at: 16.371 vs. BTDPY (7.317). PSMMY has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 751M vs. BTDPY (372M). BTDPY has higher revenues than PSMMY: BTDPY (4.39B) vs PSMMY (3.82B).
BTDPYPSMMYBTDPY / PSMMY
Capitalization5.85B4.76B123%
EBITDA372M751M50%
Gain YTD7.31716.37145%
P/E Ratio21.536.57328%
Revenue4.39B3.82B115%
Total Cash950MN/A-
Total Debt246MN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BTDPY vs PSMMY: Fundamental Ratings
BTDPY
PSMMY
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
20
Undervalued
14
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
95100
SMR RATING
1..100
9051
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5250
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
1077
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

PSMMY's Valuation (14) in the null industry is in the same range as BTDPY (20). This means that PSMMY’s stock grew similarly to BTDPY’s over the last 12 months.

BTDPY's Profit vs Risk Rating (95) in the null industry is in the same range as PSMMY (100). This means that BTDPY’s stock grew similarly to PSMMY’s over the last 12 months.

PSMMY's SMR Rating (51) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for BTDPY (90). This means that PSMMY’s stock grew somewhat faster than BTDPY’s over the last 12 months.

PSMMY's Price Growth Rating (50) in the null industry is in the same range as BTDPY (52). This means that PSMMY’s stock grew similarly to BTDPY’s over the last 12 months.

BTDPY's P/E Growth Rating (10) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for PSMMY (77). This means that BTDPY’s stock grew significantly faster than PSMMY’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BTDPYPSMMY
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
56%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
78%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
71%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
73%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
78%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
75%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
68%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
69%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
66%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
68%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 10 days ago
63%
Bullish Trend 10 days ago
59%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
68%
Bearish Trend 20 days ago
71%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
71%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
77%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
68%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
64%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
BTDPY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
PSMMY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
VAW202.460.29
+0.14%
Vanguard Materials ETF
TYLD25.270.02
+0.06%
Cambria Tactical Yield ETF
PMMF100.240.03
+0.03%
iShares Prime Money Market ETF
NAZ11.75N/A
-0.02%
Nuveen Arizona Quality Municipal Income Fund
UGL35.17-0.09
-0.26%
ProShares Ultra Gold

BTDPY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BTDPY has been closely correlated with PSMMY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 69% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if BTDPY jumps, then PSMMY could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BTDPY
1D Price
Change %
BTDPY100%
+0.38%
PSMMY - BTDPY
69%
Closely correlated
+0.98%
PHM - BTDPY
50%
Loosely correlated
-0.53%
CCS - BTDPY
49%
Loosely correlated
-2.26%
TOL - BTDPY
47%
Loosely correlated
-2.05%
KBH - BTDPY
47%
Loosely correlated
-2.85%
More

PSMMY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PSMMY has been closely correlated with BTDPY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 68% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if PSMMY jumps, then BTDPY could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To PSMMY
1D Price
Change %
PSMMY100%
+0.98%
BTDPY - PSMMY
68%
Closely correlated
+0.38%
KBH - PSMMY
50%
Loosely correlated
-2.85%
CCS - PSMMY
50%
Loosely correlated
-2.26%
TWODY - PSMMY
50%
Loosely correlated
+0.70%
PHM - PSMMY
49%
Loosely correlated
-0.53%
More