BTDPY
Price
$10.34
Change
-$0.06 (-0.58%)
Updated
Jul 25 closing price
Capitalization
5.85B
PSMMF
Price
$17.56
Change
-$0.19 (-1.07%)
Updated
May 15 closing price
Capitalization
4.76B
Interact to see
Advertisement

BTDPY vs PSMMF

Header iconBTDPY vs PSMMF Comparison
Open Charts BTDPY vs PSMMFBanner chart's image
BARRATT REDROW
Price$10.34
Change-$0.06 (-0.58%)
Volume$26.55K
Capitalization5.85B
Persimmon
Price$17.56
Change-$0.19 (-1.07%)
Volume$125
Capitalization4.76B
BTDPY vs PSMMF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
BTDPY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
PSMMF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BTDPY vs. PSMMF commentary
Jul 28, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BTDPY is a Hold and PSMMF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 28, 2025
Stock price -- (BTDPY: $10.34 vs. PSMMF: $17.56)
Brand notoriety: BTDPY and PSMMF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Homebuilding industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BTDPY: 90% vs. PSMMF: 100%
Market capitalization -- BTDPY: $5.85B vs. PSMMF: $4.76B
BTDPY [@Homebuilding] is valued at $5.85B. PSMMF’s [@Homebuilding] market capitalization is $4.76B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Homebuilding] industry ranges from $53.71B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Homebuilding] industry is $7.78B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BTDPY’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whilePSMMF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • BTDPY’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • PSMMF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, BTDPY is a better buy in the long-term than PSMMF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BTDPY’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while PSMMF’s TA Score has 0 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BTDPY’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
  • PSMMF’s TA Score: 0 bullish, 2 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, both BTDPY and PSMMF are a bad buy in the short-term.

Price Growth

BTDPY (@Homebuilding) experienced а +1.27% price change this week, while PSMMF (@Homebuilding) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Homebuilding industry was +2.44%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.97%, and the average quarterly price growth was -4.07%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Homebuilding (+2.44% weekly)

Homebuilding includes companies residential home construction companies, renovators and repair firms. The companies may be building single-family or multifamily homes, condominiums or mobile homes. Over the five years to 2019, the Home Builders industry is estimated to have grown at an annualized rate of 2.5% to reach $89.4 billion, (including expected growth of 2.6% in 2019), according to a study by IbisWorld. After having suffered one of its worst crises a decade ago during the last macroeconomic recession–which had much of its origins in U.S. real estate – the homebuilding industry has been recovering steadily so far. Higher disposable incomes and improving economic activity have bolstered consumers’ purchases of homes. While revenue of the Home Builders industry remains well below its prerecession high, demand growth estimates show promise.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BTDPY($5.85B) has a higher market cap than PSMMF($4.76B). BTDPY has higher P/E ratio than PSMMF: BTDPY (21.53) vs PSMMF (5.71). PSMMF YTD gains are higher at: 17.617 vs. BTDPY (-7.567). PSMMF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 751M vs. BTDPY (372M). BTDPY has more cash in the bank: 950M vs. PSMMF (862M). PSMMF has less debt than BTDPY: PSMMF (0) vs BTDPY (246M). BTDPY has higher revenues than PSMMF: BTDPY (4.39B) vs PSMMF (3.82B).
BTDPYPSMMFBTDPY / PSMMF
Capitalization5.85B4.76B123%
EBITDA372M751M50%
Gain YTD-7.56717.617-43%
P/E Ratio21.535.71377%
Revenue4.39B3.82B115%
Total Cash950M862M110%
Total Debt246M0-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BTDPY vs PSMMF: Fundamental Ratings
BTDPY
PSMMF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
16
Undervalued
15
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
91100
SMR RATING
1..100
8951
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
8653
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
1473
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5075

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

PSMMF's Valuation (15) in the null industry is in the same range as BTDPY (16). This means that PSMMF’s stock grew similarly to BTDPY’s over the last 12 months.

BTDPY's Profit vs Risk Rating (91) in the null industry is in the same range as PSMMF (100). This means that BTDPY’s stock grew similarly to PSMMF’s over the last 12 months.

PSMMF's SMR Rating (51) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for BTDPY (89). This means that PSMMF’s stock grew somewhat faster than BTDPY’s over the last 12 months.

PSMMF's Price Growth Rating (53) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for BTDPY (86). This means that PSMMF’s stock grew somewhat faster than BTDPY’s over the last 12 months.

BTDPY's P/E Growth Rating (14) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for PSMMF (73). This means that BTDPY’s stock grew somewhat faster than PSMMF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BTDPYPSMMF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
74%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
69%
N/A
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
66%
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
67%
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
65%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
48%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
67%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
48%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
62%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
69%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
76%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
56%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
BTDPY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
PSMMF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
CXE3.490.02
+0.58%
MFS High Income Municipal Trust
SDHY16.690.08
+0.48%
PGIM Short Duration High Yield Opportunities Fund
MHLA14.910.02
+0.13%
Maiden Holdings Ltd
LITP7.84-0.01
-0.06%
Sprott Lithium Miners ETF
SQQQ18.25-0.10
-0.54%
ProShares UltraPro Short QQQ

BTDPY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BTDPY has been closely correlated with PSMMY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 69% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if BTDPY jumps, then PSMMY could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BTDPY
1D Price
Change %
BTDPY100%
-0.58%
PSMMY - BTDPY
69%
Closely correlated
-1.46%
PHM - BTDPY
50%
Loosely correlated
+0.28%
CCS - BTDPY
49%
Loosely correlated
-1.26%
TOL - BTDPY
47%
Loosely correlated
+0.34%
KBH - BTDPY
47%
Loosely correlated
+0.55%
More

PSMMF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that PSMMF and CYRBY have been poorly correlated (+11% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that PSMMF and CYRBY's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To PSMMF
1D Price
Change %
PSMMF100%
N/A
CYRBY - PSMMF
11%
Poorly correlated
-0.55%
BVHMF - PSMMF
9%
Poorly correlated
-0.12%
BTDPY - PSMMF
5%
Poorly correlated
-0.58%
BTDPF - PSMMF
3%
Poorly correlated
N/A
BLWYY - PSMMF
3%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More