BTDPY
Price
$12.01
Change
+$0.05 (+0.42%)
Updated
Jul 3 closing price
Capitalization
5.85B
CCS
Price
$59.67
Change
-$1.38 (-2.26%)
Updated
Jul 3 closing price
Capitalization
3.07B
17 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

BTDPY vs CCS

Header iconBTDPY vs CCS Comparison
Open Charts BTDPY vs CCSBanner chart's image
BARRATT REDROW
Price$12.01
Change+$0.05 (+0.42%)
Volume$48.88K
Capitalization5.85B
Century Communities
Price$59.67
Change-$1.38 (-2.26%)
Volume$221.65K
Capitalization3.07B
BTDPY vs CCS Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
BTDPY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
CCS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BTDPY vs. CCS commentary
Jul 07, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BTDPY is a Hold and CCS is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 07, 2025
Stock price -- (BTDPY: $12.01)
Brand notoriety:
Market capitalization --

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BTDPY’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green while.

  • BTDPY’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BTDPY’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while CCS’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BTDPY’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • CCS’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, CCS is a better buy in the short-term than BTDPY.

Price Growth

BTDPY (@Homebuilding) experienced а -7.30% price change this weekfor the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Homebuilding industry was +0.60%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +5.10%, and the average quarterly price growth was +3.25%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Homebuilding (+0.60% weekly)

Homebuilding includes companies residential home construction companies, renovators and repair firms. The companies may be building single-family or multifamily homes, condominiums or mobile homes. Over the five years to 2019, the Home Builders industry is estimated to have grown at an annualized rate of 2.5% to reach $89.4 billion, (including expected growth of 2.6% in 2019), according to a study by IbisWorld. After having suffered one of its worst crises a decade ago during the last macroeconomic recession–which had much of its origins in U.S. real estate – the homebuilding industry has been recovering steadily so far. Higher disposable incomes and improving economic activity have bolstered consumers’ purchases of homes. While revenue of the Home Builders industry remains well below its prerecession high, demand growth estimates show promise.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BTDPY($5.85B) has a higher market cap than CCS($3.07B). BTDPY has higher P/E ratio than CCS: BTDPY (21.53) vs CCS (11.86). BTDPY YTD gains are higher at: 7.317 vs. CCS (-17.912). BTDPY (372M) and CCS (371M) have comparable annual earnings (EBITDA) . BTDPY has more cash in the bank: 950M vs. CCS (226M). BTDPY has less debt than CCS: BTDPY (246M) vs CCS (1.3B). BTDPY has higher revenues than CCS: BTDPY (4.39B) vs CCS (3.69B).
BTDPYCCSBTDPY / CCS
Capitalization5.85B3.07B191%
EBITDA372M371M100%
Gain YTD7.317-17.912-41%
P/E Ratio21.5311.86182%
Revenue4.39B3.69B119%
Total Cash950M226M420%
Total Debt246M1.3B19%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BTDPY vs CCS: Fundamental Ratings
BTDPY
CCS
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
20
Undervalued
38
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
9559
SMR RATING
1..100
9060
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5260
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
1086
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

BTDPY's Valuation (20) in the null industry is in the same range as CCS (38) in the Homebuilding industry. This means that BTDPY’s stock grew similarly to CCS’s over the last 12 months.

CCS's Profit vs Risk Rating (59) in the Homebuilding industry is somewhat better than the same rating for BTDPY (95) in the null industry. This means that CCS’s stock grew somewhat faster than BTDPY’s over the last 12 months.

CCS's SMR Rating (60) in the Homebuilding industry is in the same range as BTDPY (90) in the null industry. This means that CCS’s stock grew similarly to BTDPY’s over the last 12 months.

BTDPY's Price Growth Rating (52) in the null industry is in the same range as CCS (60) in the Homebuilding industry. This means that BTDPY’s stock grew similarly to CCS’s over the last 12 months.

BTDPY's P/E Growth Rating (10) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for CCS (86) in the Homebuilding industry. This means that BTDPY’s stock grew significantly faster than CCS’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BTDPYCCS
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
73%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
56%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
75%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
71%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
79%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
78%
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
68%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
77%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
66%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
79%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 10 days ago
63%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
75%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
68%
Bearish Trend 19 days ago
73%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
71%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
65%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
68%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
79%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
BTDPY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
CCS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
FTVFX35.310.15
+0.43%
Fidelity Advisor Value M
ALPAX10.720.04
+0.37%
American Century Focused Lg Cap Val A
CBFCX39.750.14
+0.35%
American Funds Global Balanced 529C
OAIEX14.880.05
+0.34%
Optimum International A
CAMMX22.560.03
+0.13%
Cambiar SMID Investor

BTDPY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BTDPY has been closely correlated with PSMMY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 69% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if BTDPY jumps, then PSMMY could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BTDPY
1D Price
Change %
BTDPY100%
+0.38%
PSMMY - BTDPY
69%
Closely correlated
+0.98%
PHM - BTDPY
50%
Loosely correlated
-1.78%
CCS - BTDPY
49%
Loosely correlated
-2.26%
TOL - BTDPY
47%
Loosely correlated
-2.05%
KBH - BTDPY
47%
Loosely correlated
-2.85%
More

CCS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CCS has been closely correlated with KBH. These tickers have moved in lockstep 87% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CCS jumps, then KBH could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CCS
1D Price
Change %
CCS100%
-2.26%
KBH - CCS
87%
Closely correlated
-2.85%
PHM - CCS
86%
Closely correlated
-1.78%
TOL - CCS
84%
Closely correlated
-2.05%
LEN - CCS
83%
Closely correlated
-4.09%
DHI - CCS
80%
Closely correlated
-2.74%
More