Advertisement
BTDPF vs CYRBY
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BTDPF is a Hold and CYRBY is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
BTDPF’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileCYRBY’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
- BTDPF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
- CYRBY’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
Price Growth
BTDPF (@Homebuilding) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while CYRBY (@Homebuilding) price change was -1.02% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Homebuilding industry was +1.85%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +3.89%, and the average quarterly price growth was -0.47%.
Industries' Descriptions
@Homebuilding (+1.85% weekly)Homebuilding includes companies residential home construction companies, renovators and repair firms. The companies may be building single-family or multifamily homes, condominiums or mobile homes. Over the five years to 2019, the Home Builders industry is estimated to have grown at an annualized rate of 2.5% to reach $89.4 billion, (including expected growth of 2.6% in 2019), according to a study by IbisWorld. After having suffered one of its worst crises a decade ago during the last macroeconomic recession–which had much of its origins in U.S. real estate – the homebuilding industry has been recovering steadily so far. Higher disposable incomes and improving economic activity have bolstered consumers’ purchases of homes. While revenue of the Home Builders industry remains well below its prerecession high, demand growth estimates show promise.
| BTDPF | CYRBY | BTDPF / CYRBY | |
| Capitalization | 5.72B | 1.89B | 303% |
| EBITDA | 768M | 1.55B | 49% |
| Gain YTD | -8.971 | 61.687 | -15% |
| P/E Ratio | 8.11 | 10.29 | 79% |
| Revenue | 5.81B | 5.46B | 106% |
| Total Cash | 1.17B | 2.79B | 42% |
| Total Debt | 242M | 4.66B | 5% |
BTDPF | CYRBY | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 41 | 7 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 15 Undervalued | 6 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 48 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 90 | 46 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 76 | 42 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 14 | 78 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
CYRBY's Valuation (6) in the null industry is in the same range as BTDPF (15). This means that CYRBY’s stock grew similarly to BTDPF’s over the last 12 months.
CYRBY's Profit vs Risk Rating (48) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for BTDPF (100). This means that CYRBY’s stock grew somewhat faster than BTDPF’s over the last 12 months.
CYRBY's SMR Rating (46) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for BTDPF (90). This means that CYRBY’s stock grew somewhat faster than BTDPF’s over the last 12 months.
CYRBY's Price Growth Rating (42) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for BTDPF (76). This means that CYRBY’s stock grew somewhat faster than BTDPF’s over the last 12 months.
BTDPF's P/E Growth Rating (14) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CYRBY (78). This means that BTDPF’s stock grew somewhat faster than CYRBY’s over the last 12 months.
| RSI ODDS (%) |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) |
| Momentum ODDS (%) |
| MACD ODDS (%) |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) |
| Advances ODDS (%) |
| Declines ODDS (%) |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) |
| Aroon ODDS (%) |
Advertisement
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| PHO | 68.93 | 0.52 | +0.76% |
| Invesco Water Resources ETF | |||
| IMFL | 27.17 | 0.06 | +0.22% |
| Invesco Intl Dev Dynmc Mltfctr ETF | |||
| FICS | 39.64 | 0.05 | +0.13% |
| First Trust Intl Developed Cap Strth ETF | |||
| OILK | 42.96 | -0.21 | -0.49% |
| ProShares K-1 Free Crude Oil ETF | |||
| IBGA | 24.14 | -0.17 | -0.70% |
| iShares iBonds Dec 2044 Term Trsy ETF | |||
BTDPF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that BTDPF and NOBH have been poorly correlated (+13% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that BTDPF and NOBH's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To BTDPF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BTDPF | 100% | N/A | ||
| NOBH - BTDPF | 13% Poorly correlated | +0.67% | ||
| BLWYY - BTDPF | 5% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| PSMMF - BTDPF | 3% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| CYRBY - BTDPF | 3% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| BVHMF - BTDPF | 2% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
More | ||||
CYRBY and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that CYRBY and BLWYY have been poorly correlated (+12% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CYRBY and BLWYY's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CYRBY | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CYRBY | 100% | N/A | ||
| BLWYY - CYRBY | 12% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| PSMMF - CYRBY | 11% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| GFASY - CYRBY | 10% Poorly correlated | +180.28% | ||
| PSMMY - CYRBY | 10% Poorly correlated | -0.77% | ||
| BLWYF - CYRBY | 9% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
More | ||||