BTCWF
Price
$0.07
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Sep 5 closing price
Capitalization
4.97M
MNXBF
Price
$6.15
Change
+$0.07 (+1.15%)
Updated
Aug 27 closing price
Capitalization
1.37B
Interact to see
Advertisement

BTCWF vs MNXBF

Header iconBTCWF vs MNXBF Comparison
Open Charts BTCWF vs MNXBFBanner chart's image
Bluesky Digital Assets
Price$0.07
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$352.28K
Capitalization4.97M
Monex Group
Price$6.15
Change+$0.07 (+1.15%)
Volume$100
Capitalization1.37B
BTCWF vs MNXBF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
BTCWF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MNXBF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BTCWF vs. MNXBF commentary
Sep 08, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BTCWF is a Hold and MNXBF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 08, 2025
Stock price -- (BTCWF: $0.07 vs. MNXBF: $6.15)
Brand notoriety: BTCWF and MNXBF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Investment Banks/Brokers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BTCWF: 181% vs. MNXBF: 5%
Market capitalization -- BTCWF: $4.97M vs. MNXBF: $1.37B
BTCWF [@Investment Banks/Brokers] is valued at $4.97M. MNXBF’s [@Investment Banks/Brokers] market capitalization is $1.37B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Banks/Brokers] industry ranges from $928.5B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Banks/Brokers] industry is $10.09B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BTCWF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileMNXBF’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • BTCWF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • MNXBF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, MNXBF is a better buy in the long-term than BTCWF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BTCWF’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MNXBF’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BTCWF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • MNXBF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 1 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, MNXBF is a better buy in the short-term than BTCWF.

Price Growth

BTCWF (@Investment Banks/Brokers) experienced а -5.14% price change this week, while MNXBF (@Investment Banks/Brokers) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Banks/Brokers industry was +0.73%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.48%, and the average quarterly price growth was +41.22%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Banks/Brokers (+0.73% weekly)

These banks specialize in underwriting (helping companies with debt financing or equity issuances), IPOs, facilitating mergers and other corporate reorganizations and acting as a broker or financial advisor for institutions. They might also trade securities on their own accounts. Investment banks potentially thrive on expanding its network of clients, since that could help them increase profits. Goldman Sachs, Morgan Stanley and CME Group Inc are some of the largest investment banking companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MNXBF($1.37B) has a higher market cap than BTCWF($4.97M). MNXBF YTD gains are higher at: -0.806 vs. BTCWF (-74.758). MNXBF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 40.9B vs. BTCWF (-3.94M). MNXBF has more cash in the bank: 53.4B vs. BTCWF (828K). BTCWF has less debt than MNXBF: BTCWF (118K) vs MNXBF (78.6B). MNXBF has higher revenues than BTCWF: MNXBF (91.1B) vs BTCWF (0).
BTCWFMNXBFBTCWF / MNXBF
Capitalization4.97M1.37B0%
EBITDA-3.94M40.9B-0%
Gain YTD-74.758-0.8069,270%
P/E RatioN/A27.51-
Revenue091.1B-
Total Cash828K53.4B0%
Total Debt118K78.6B0%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BTCWF vs MNXBF: Fundamental Ratings
BTCWF
MNXBF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
76
Overvalued
19
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10062
SMR RATING
1..100
100100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
6541
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
1007
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
9030

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

MNXBF's Valuation (19) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for BTCWF (76). This means that MNXBF’s stock grew somewhat faster than BTCWF’s over the last 12 months.

MNXBF's Profit vs Risk Rating (62) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for BTCWF (100). This means that MNXBF’s stock grew somewhat faster than BTCWF’s over the last 12 months.

MNXBF's SMR Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as BTCWF (100). This means that MNXBF’s stock grew similarly to BTCWF’s over the last 12 months.

MNXBF's Price Growth Rating (41) in the null industry is in the same range as BTCWF (65). This means that MNXBF’s stock grew similarly to BTCWF’s over the last 12 months.

MNXBF's P/E Growth Rating (7) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for BTCWF (100). This means that MNXBF’s stock grew significantly faster than BTCWF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BTCWFMNXBF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
80%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
47%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
41%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
39%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
39%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
87%
Bullish Trend 13 days ago
38%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
90%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
42%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
BTCWF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MNXBF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
INMD14.980.57
+3.96%
InMode Ltd
SON46.220.71
+1.56%
Sonoco Products Company
PCAR99.050.84
+0.86%
PACCAR
CCRD27.240.18
+0.67%
CoreCard Corp
TRT5.37-0.13
-2.36%
Trio-Tech International

BTCWF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that BTCWF and AVFCF have been poorly correlated (+32% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that BTCWF and AVFCF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BTCWF
1D Price
Change %
BTCWF100%
-1.63%
AVFCF - BTCWF
32%
Poorly correlated
N/A
MNXBF - BTCWF
20%
Poorly correlated
N/A
MATH - BTCWF
20%
Poorly correlated
+1.55%
NPPTF - BTCWF
20%
Poorly correlated
+0.15%
BOMXF - BTCWF
14%
Poorly correlated
-0.99%
More

MNXBF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that MNXBF and PIHG have been poorly correlated (+26% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that MNXBF and PIHG's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MNXBF
1D Price
Change %
MNXBF100%
N/A
PIHG - MNXBF
26%
Poorly correlated
N/A
BTCWF - MNXBF
21%
Poorly correlated
-1.63%
MNTR - MNXBF
14%
Poorly correlated
+3.31%
COIN - MNXBF
6%
Poorly correlated
-2.52%
BITF - MNXBF
5%
Poorly correlated
+3.20%
More