BTCWF
Price
$0.06
Change
-$0.01 (-14.29%)
Updated
Sep 26 closing price
Capitalization
4.67M
MATH
Price
$3.66
Change
-$0.01 (-0.27%)
Updated
Sep 26 closing price
Capitalization
144.56M
Interact to see
Advertisement

BTCWF vs MATH

Header iconBTCWF vs MATH Comparison
Open Charts BTCWF vs MATHBanner chart's image
Bluesky Digital Assets
Price$0.06
Change-$0.01 (-14.29%)
Volume$39.16K
Capitalization4.67M
Metalpha Technology Holding
Price$3.66
Change-$0.01 (-0.27%)
Volume$115.93K
Capitalization144.56M
BTCWF vs MATH Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
BTCWF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MATH
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BTCWF vs. MATH commentary
Sep 28, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BTCWF is a Buy and MATH is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 28, 2025
Stock price -- (BTCWF: $0.06 vs. MATH: $3.66)
Brand notoriety: BTCWF and MATH are both not notable
Both companies represent the Investment Banks/Brokers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BTCWF: 23% vs. MATH: 64%
Market capitalization -- BTCWF: $4.67M vs. MATH: $144.56M
BTCWF [@Investment Banks/Brokers] is valued at $4.67M. MATH’s [@Investment Banks/Brokers] market capitalization is $144.56M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Banks/Brokers] industry ranges from $928.5B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Banks/Brokers] industry is $10.53B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BTCWF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileMATH’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • BTCWF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • MATH’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, MATH is a better buy in the long-term than BTCWF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BTCWF’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MATH’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BTCWF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • MATH’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, MATH is a better buy in the short-term than BTCWF.

Price Growth

BTCWF (@Investment Banks/Brokers) experienced а -4.19% price change this week, while MATH (@Investment Banks/Brokers) price change was +0.55% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Banks/Brokers industry was -0.96%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +11.97%, and the average quarterly price growth was +64.54%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Banks/Brokers (-0.96% weekly)

These banks specialize in underwriting (helping companies with debt financing or equity issuances), IPOs, facilitating mergers and other corporate reorganizations and acting as a broker or financial advisor for institutions. They might also trade securities on their own accounts. Investment banks potentially thrive on expanding its network of clients, since that could help them increase profits. Goldman Sachs, Morgan Stanley and CME Group Inc are some of the largest investment banking companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MATH($145M) has a higher market cap than BTCWF($4.67M). MATH YTD gains are higher at: 218.261 vs. BTCWF (-75.670).
BTCWFMATHBTCWF / MATH
Capitalization4.67M145M3%
EBITDA-3.94MN/A-
Gain YTD-75.670218.261-35%
P/E RatioN/A8.93-
Revenue0N/A-
Total Cash828KN/A-
Total Debt118KN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BTCWF vs MATH: Fundamental Ratings
BTCWF
MATH
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5092
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
77
Overvalued
73
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100100
SMR RATING
1..100
100100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
6436
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
10092
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
9045

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

MATH's Valuation (73) in the null industry is in the same range as BTCWF (77). This means that MATH’s stock grew similarly to BTCWF’s over the last 12 months.

MATH's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as BTCWF (100). This means that MATH’s stock grew similarly to BTCWF’s over the last 12 months.

MATH's SMR Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as BTCWF (100). This means that MATH’s stock grew similarly to BTCWF’s over the last 12 months.

MATH's Price Growth Rating (36) in the null industry is in the same range as BTCWF (64). This means that MATH’s stock grew similarly to BTCWF’s over the last 12 months.

MATH's P/E Growth Rating (92) in the null industry is in the same range as BTCWF (100). This means that MATH’s stock grew similarly to BTCWF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BTCWFMATH
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
84%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
88%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
83%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
87%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
85%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
84%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
88%
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
86%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
82%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
85%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
85%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
90%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
BTCWF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MATH
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
IZM2.390.06
+2.58%
ICZOOM Group
SCL47.230.79
+1.70%
Stepan Co
MGRM5.910.02
+0.34%
Monogram Orthopaedics
GLW79.350.22
+0.28%
Corning
AX87.450.16
+0.18%
Axos Financial

BTCWF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that BTCWF and AVFCF have been poorly correlated (+32% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that BTCWF and AVFCF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BTCWF
1D Price
Change %
BTCWF100%
-4.48%
AVFCF - BTCWF
32%
Poorly correlated
N/A
MNXBF - BTCWF
20%
Poorly correlated
N/A
MATH - BTCWF
20%
Poorly correlated
-0.27%
NPPTF - BTCWF
20%
Poorly correlated
-7.20%
BOMXF - BTCWF
14%
Poorly correlated
-0.48%
More

MATH and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that MATH and HIVE have been poorly correlated (+29% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that MATH and HIVE's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MATH
1D Price
Change %
MATH100%
-0.27%
HIVE - MATH
29%
Poorly correlated
-1.68%
ARBK - MATH
28%
Poorly correlated
-0.50%
COIN - MATH
26%
Poorly correlated
+1.92%
HOOD - MATH
25%
Poorly correlated
-0.71%
BTBT - MATH
25%
Poorly correlated
+0.34%
More