BTCWF
Price
$0.18
Change
+$0.01 (+5.88%)
Updated
Jan 22 closing price
Capitalization
3.48M
CSTXF
Price
$0.02
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Jan 22 closing price
Capitalization
11.33M
Ad is loading...

BTCWF vs CSTXF

Header iconBTCWF vs CSTXF Comparison
Open Charts BTCWF vs CSTXFBanner chart's image
Bluesky Digital Assets
Price$0.18
Change+$0.01 (+5.88%)
Volume$958.94K
Capitalization3.48M
Cryptostar
Price$0.02
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$87.1K
Capitalization11.33M
BTCWF vs CSTXF Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BTCWF vs. CSTXF commentary
Jan 24, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BTCWF is a Hold and CSTXF is a Hold.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jan 24, 2025
Stock price -- (BTCWF: $0.18 vs. CSTXF: $0.02)
Brand notoriety: BTCWF and CSTXF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Investment Banks/Brokers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BTCWF: 32% vs. CSTXF: 166%
Market capitalization -- BTCWF: $3.48M vs. CSTXF: $11.33M
BTCWF [@Investment Banks/Brokers] is valued at $3.48M. CSTXF’s [@Investment Banks/Brokers] market capitalization is $11.33M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Banks/Brokers] industry ranges from $928.5B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Banks/Brokers] industry is $11.6B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BTCWF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileCSTXF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • BTCWF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • CSTXF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, BTCWF is a better buy in the long-term than CSTXF.

Price Growth

BTCWF (@Investment Banks/Brokers) experienced а -26.58% price change this week, while CSTXF (@Investment Banks/Brokers) price change was +6.46% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Banks/Brokers industry was +1.28%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +17.88%, and the average quarterly price growth was +40.15%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Banks/Brokers (+1.28% weekly)

These banks specialize in underwriting (helping companies with debt financing or equity issuances), IPOs, facilitating mergers and other corporate reorganizations and acting as a broker or financial advisor for institutions. They might also trade securities on their own accounts. Investment banks potentially thrive on expanding its network of clients, since that could help them increase profits. Goldman Sachs, Morgan Stanley and CME Group Inc are some of the largest investment banking companies.

FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CSTXF($11.3M) has a higher market cap than BTCWF($3.48M). CSTXF YTD gains are higher at: -9.330 vs. BTCWF (-33.017). BTCWF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -6.25M vs. CSTXF (-11.14M). CSTXF has more cash in the bank: 3.11M vs. BTCWF (102K). BTCWF has less debt than CSTXF: BTCWF (248K) vs CSTXF (4.18M). CSTXF has higher revenues than BTCWF: CSTXF (5.09M) vs BTCWF (835K).
BTCWFCSTXFBTCWF / CSTXF
Capitalization3.48M11.3M31%
EBITDA-6.25M-11.14M56%
Gain YTD-33.017-9.330354%
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
Revenue835K5.09M16%
Total Cash102K3.11M3%
Total Debt248K4.18M6%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BTCWF: Fundamental Ratings
BTCWF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
54
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
50
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100
SMR RATING
1..100
100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
34
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
RSI
ODDS (%)
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Momentum
ODDS (%)
MACD
ODDS (%)
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Advances
ODDS (%)
Declines
ODDS (%)
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Aroon
ODDS (%)
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
GME27.650.18
+0.66%
GameStop Corp
SPY606.443.39
+0.56%
SPDR® S&P 500® ETF Trust
AAPL223.831.19
+0.53%
Apple
TSLA415.11-8.96
-2.11%
Tesla
BTC.X103653.070000-2493.195300
-2.35%
Bitcoin cryptocurrency

BTCWF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that BTCWF and AVFCF have been poorly correlated (+32% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that BTCWF and AVFCF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BTCWF
1D Price
Change %
BTCWF100%
+3.10%
AVFCF - BTCWF
32%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CSTXF - BTCWF
21%
Poorly correlated
+2.99%
MNXBF - BTCWF
20%
Poorly correlated
N/A
MATH - BTCWF
20%
Poorly correlated
-4.11%
NPPTF - BTCWF
20%
Poorly correlated
+8.70%
More

CSTXF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CSTXF and BTCWF have been poorly correlated (+21% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CSTXF and BTCWF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CSTXF
1D Price
Change %
CSTXF100%
+2.99%
BTCWF - CSTXF
21%
Poorly correlated
+3.10%
NPPTF - CSTXF
20%
Poorly correlated
+8.70%
BRPHF - CSTXF
20%
Poorly correlated
+4.40%
ERNXY - CSTXF
5%
Poorly correlated
+3.58%
HOOD - CSTXF
3%
Poorly correlated
+0.32%
More