BTCWF
Price
$0.12
Change
+$0.02 (+20.00%)
Updated
May 16 closing price
Capitalization
3.48M
CGXYY
Price
$21.30
Change
-$1.98 (-8.51%)
Updated
Apr 11 closing price
Capitalization
14.46B
Ad is loading...

BTCWF vs CGXYY

Header iconBTCWF vs CGXYY Comparison
Open Charts BTCWF vs CGXYYBanner chart's image
Bluesky Digital Assets
Price$0.12
Change+$0.02 (+20.00%)
Volume$146.78K
Capitalization3.48M
China Galaxy Securities
Price$21.30
Change-$1.98 (-8.51%)
Volume$137
Capitalization14.46B
BTCWF vs CGXYY Comparison Chart
Loading...
BTCWF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BTCWF vs. CGXYY commentary
May 17, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BTCWF is a Hold and CGXYY is a Hold.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
May 17, 2025
Stock price -- (BTCWF: $0.10 vs. CGXYY: $21.30)
Brand notoriety: BTCWF and CGXYY are both not notable
Both companies represent the Investment Banks/Brokers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BTCWF: 40% vs. CGXYY: 79%
Market capitalization -- BTCWF: $3.48M vs. CGXYY: $14.46B
BTCWF [@Investment Banks/Brokers] is valued at $3.48M. CGXYY’s [@Investment Banks/Brokers] market capitalization is $14.46B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Banks/Brokers] industry ranges from $928.5B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Banks/Brokers] industry is $12.02B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BTCWF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileCGXYY’s FA Score has 4 green FA rating(s).

  • BTCWF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • CGXYY’s FA Score: 4 green, 1 red.
According to our system of comparison, CGXYY is a better buy in the long-term than BTCWF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BTCWF’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • BTCWF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 7 bearish.

Price Growth

BTCWF (@Investment Banks/Brokers) experienced а -9.17% price change this week, while CGXYY (@Investment Banks/Brokers) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Banks/Brokers industry was +4.64%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +22.47%, and the average quarterly price growth was +125.43%.

Reported Earning Dates

CGXYY is expected to report earnings on Mar 28, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Banks/Brokers (+4.64% weekly)

These banks specialize in underwriting (helping companies with debt financing or equity issuances), IPOs, facilitating mergers and other corporate reorganizations and acting as a broker or financial advisor for institutions. They might also trade securities on their own accounts. Investment banks potentially thrive on expanding its network of clients, since that could help them increase profits. Goldman Sachs, Morgan Stanley and CME Group Inc are some of the largest investment banking companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CGXYY($14.5B) has a higher market cap than BTCWF($3.48M). CGXYY YTD gains are higher at: -4.054 vs. BTCWF (-60.084). CGXYY has higher revenues than BTCWF: CGXYY (18.6B) vs BTCWF (835K).
BTCWFCGXYYBTCWF / CGXYY
Capitalization3.48M14.5B0%
EBITDA-6.25MN/A-
Gain YTD-60.084-4.0541,482%
P/E RatioN/A131.58-
Revenue835K18.6B0%
Total Cash102KN/A-
Total Debt248KN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BTCWF vs CGXYY: Fundamental Ratings
BTCWF
CGXYY
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5546
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
55
Fair valued
22
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10017
SMR RATING
1..100
1007
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
6444
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
10025
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

CGXYY's Valuation (22) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for BTCWF (55). This means that CGXYY’s stock grew somewhat faster than BTCWF’s over the last 12 months.

CGXYY's Profit vs Risk Rating (17) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for BTCWF (100). This means that CGXYY’s stock grew significantly faster than BTCWF’s over the last 12 months.

CGXYY's SMR Rating (7) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for BTCWF (100). This means that CGXYY’s stock grew significantly faster than BTCWF’s over the last 12 months.

CGXYY's Price Growth Rating (44) in the null industry is in the same range as BTCWF (64). This means that CGXYY’s stock grew similarly to BTCWF’s over the last 12 months.

CGXYY's P/E Growth Rating (25) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for BTCWF (100). This means that CGXYY’s stock grew significantly faster than BTCWF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BTCWF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
87%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
88%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
85%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
BTCWF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
SPY590.462.87
+0.49%
SPDR® S&P 500® ETF
BTC.X103744.640000205.226560
+0.20%
Bitcoin cryptocurrency
GME28.63-0.10
-0.35%
GameStop Corp
AAPL211.45-0.88
-0.41%
Apple
TSLA342.82-4.86
-1.40%
Tesla

BTCWF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that BTCWF and AVFCF have been poorly correlated (+32% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that BTCWF and AVFCF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BTCWF
1D Price
Change %
BTCWF100%
-1.55%
AVFCF - BTCWF
32%
Poorly correlated
N/A
MNXBF - BTCWF
20%
Poorly correlated
N/A
MATH - BTCWF
20%
Poorly correlated
-8.02%
NPPTF - BTCWF
20%
Poorly correlated
-2.96%
BOMXF - BTCWF
14%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

CGXYY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CGXYY and BTBT have been poorly correlated (+21% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CGXYY and BTBT's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CGXYY
1D Price
Change %
CGXYY100%
N/A
BTBT - CGXYY
21%
Poorly correlated
-3.74%
BTCWF - CGXYY
6%
Poorly correlated
-1.55%
CIIHF - CGXYY
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
BLVDF - CGXYY
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CCORF - CGXYY
0%
Poorly correlated
+8.19%
More