BTBT
Price
$3.27
Change
-$0.05 (-1.51%)
Updated
Jul 22 closing price
Capitalization
326.02M
22 days until earnings call
CLSK
Price
$12.84
Change
+$0.45 (+3.63%)
Updated
Jul 22 closing price
Capitalization
4.78B
20 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

BTBT vs CLSK

Header iconBTBT vs CLSK Comparison
Open Charts BTBT vs CLSKBanner chart's image
Bit Digital
Price$3.27
Change-$0.05 (-1.51%)
Volume$42.91M
Capitalization326.02M
CleanSpark
Price$12.84
Change+$0.45 (+3.63%)
Volume$20.71M
Capitalization4.78B
BTBT vs CLSK Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
BTBT
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
CLSK
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BTBT vs. CLSK commentary
Jul 23, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BTBT is a StrongBuy and CLSK is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 23, 2025
Stock price -- (BTBT: $3.27 vs. CLSK: $12.84)
Brand notoriety: BTBT and CLSK are both not notable
Both companies represent the Investment Banks/Brokers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BTBT: 113% vs. CLSK: 74%
Market capitalization -- BTBT: $326.02M vs. CLSK: $4.78B
BTBT [@Investment Banks/Brokers] is valued at $326.02M. CLSK’s [@Investment Banks/Brokers] market capitalization is $4.78B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Banks/Brokers] industry ranges from $928.5B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Banks/Brokers] industry is $12.11B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BTBT’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileCLSK’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • BTBT’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • CLSK’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, BTBT is a better buy in the long-term than CLSK.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BTBT’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while CLSK’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BTBT’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • CLSK’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, CLSK is a better buy in the short-term than BTBT.

Price Growth

BTBT (@Investment Banks/Brokers) experienced а -0.61% price change this week, while CLSK (@Investment Banks/Brokers) price change was +5.33% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Banks/Brokers industry was +1.93%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +16.98%, and the average quarterly price growth was +10.20%.

Reported Earning Dates

BTBT is expected to report earnings on Aug 14, 2025.

CLSK is expected to report earnings on Aug 12, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Banks/Brokers (+1.93% weekly)

These banks specialize in underwriting (helping companies with debt financing or equity issuances), IPOs, facilitating mergers and other corporate reorganizations and acting as a broker or financial advisor for institutions. They might also trade securities on their own accounts. Investment banks potentially thrive on expanding its network of clients, since that could help them increase profits. Goldman Sachs, Morgan Stanley and CME Group Inc are some of the largest investment banking companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CLSK($4.78B) has a higher market cap than BTBT($326M). CLSK YTD gains are higher at: 39.414 vs. BTBT (11.604). CLSK has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 60.4M vs. BTBT (-12.31M). CLSK has more cash in the bank: 176M vs. BTBT (23.4M). BTBT has less debt than CLSK: BTBT (6.22M) vs CLSK (15.2M). CLSK has higher revenues than BTBT: CLSK (216M) vs BTBT (44.9M).
BTBTCLSKBTBT / CLSK
Capitalization326M4.78B7%
EBITDA-12.31M60.4M-20%
Gain YTD11.60439.41429%
P/E Ratio19.53N/A-
Revenue44.9M216M21%
Total Cash23.4M176M13%
Total Debt6.22M15.2M41%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BTBT vs CLSK: Fundamental Ratings
BTBT
CLSK
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
7312
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
71
Overvalued
81
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
9277
SMR RATING
1..100
9593
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
9190
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
1182
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
8549

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

BTBT's Valuation (71) in the Finance Or Rental Or Leasing industry is in the same range as CLSK (81) in the null industry. This means that BTBT’s stock grew similarly to CLSK’s over the last 12 months.

CLSK's Profit vs Risk Rating (77) in the null industry is in the same range as BTBT (92) in the Finance Or Rental Or Leasing industry. This means that CLSK’s stock grew similarly to BTBT’s over the last 12 months.

CLSK's SMR Rating (93) in the null industry is in the same range as BTBT (95) in the Finance Or Rental Or Leasing industry. This means that CLSK’s stock grew similarly to BTBT’s over the last 12 months.

CLSK's Price Growth Rating (90) in the null industry is in the same range as BTBT (91) in the Finance Or Rental Or Leasing industry. This means that CLSK’s stock grew similarly to BTBT’s over the last 12 months.

BTBT's P/E Growth Rating (11) in the Finance Or Rental Or Leasing industry is significantly better than the same rating for CLSK (82) in the null industry. This means that BTBT’s stock grew significantly faster than CLSK’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BTBTCLSK
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
88%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
84%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
85%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
87%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
89%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
87%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
86%
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
87%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 8 days ago
89%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
86%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
85%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
87%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
BTBT
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
CLSK
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
WDGJF0.380.05
+13.47%
Wood Group (John) Plc.
AMLM0.04N/A
+6.92%
American Lithium Minerals, Inc.
CPFXF0.180.01
+3.50%
Copper Fox Metals Inc.
XYIGF1.02N/A
N/A
Xinyi Glass Holdings Ltd.
LTOUF40.70N/A
N/A
Larsen & Toubro Ltd.

BTBT and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BTBT has been closely correlated with BITF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 73% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if BTBT jumps, then BITF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BTBT
1D Price
Change %
BTBT100%
-1.51%
BITF - BTBT
73%
Closely correlated
+16.81%
HIVE - BTBT
72%
Closely correlated
+10.13%
HUT - BTBT
71%
Closely correlated
+0.28%
CLSK - BTBT
70%
Closely correlated
+3.63%
WULF - BTBT
70%
Closely correlated
+5.41%
More

CLSK and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CLSK has been closely correlated with RIOT. These tickers have moved in lockstep 86% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CLSK jumps, then RIOT could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CLSK
1D Price
Change %
CLSK100%
+3.63%
RIOT - CLSK
86%
Closely correlated
+1.78%
MARA - CLSK
85%
Closely correlated
+5.58%
BITF - CLSK
84%
Closely correlated
+16.81%
HIVE - CLSK
82%
Closely correlated
+10.13%
IREN - CLSK
77%
Closely correlated
+2.42%
More