Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BTBFX vs RGNBX
BTBFX vs RGNBX Comparison
Open Charts BTBFX vs RGNBX
Boston Trust Asset Management
Price$59.80
Change-$0.01 (-0.02%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets532.04M
American Funds Growth and Inc Port R2
Price$22.20
Change+$0.01 (+0.05%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets21.95B
BTBFX vs RGNBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BTBFX vs. RGNBX commentary
Dec 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BTBFX is a Hold and RGNBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGNBX has more cash in the bank: 21.9B vs. BTBFX (532M). BTBFX pays higher dividends than RGNBX: BTBFX (1.35) vs RGNBX (0.93). BTBFX was incepted earlier than RGNBX: BTBFX (30 years) vs RGNBX (14 years). RGNBX (1.40) is less costly to investors than BTBFX (0.80). RGNBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 10.00 vs. BTBFX (7.52). RGNBX has a lower initial minimum investment than BTBFX: RGNBX (250) vs BTBFX (100000). RGNBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 13.01 vs. BTBFX (-4.50). RGNBX return over 5 years is better than : 35.94 vs. BTBFX (12.27).
| BTBFX | RGNBX | BTBFX / RGNBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.80 | 1.40 | 57% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.80 | 1.40 | 57% |
| Fund Existence | 30 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -2.937 | 18.225 | -16% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 100000 | 250 | 40,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 532M | 21.9B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.35 | 0.93 | 146% |
| Returns for 1 year | -4.50 | 13.01 | -35% |
| Returns for 3 years | 11.43 | 45.53 | 25% |
| Returns for 5 years | 12.27 | 35.94 | 34% |
| Returns for 10 years | 63.87 | 79.94 | 80% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers