Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BTBFX vs FSIDX
BTBFX vs FSIDX Comparison
Open Charts BTBFX vs FSIDX
Boston Trust Asset Management
Price$64.20
Change+$0.27 (+0.42%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets562.19M
Fidelity Advisor Strategic Div & Inc I
Price$17.78
Change+$0.02 (+0.11%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets5.21B
BTBFX vs FSIDX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BTBFX vs. FSIDX commentary
Jul 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BTBFX is a Buy and FSIDX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSIDX has more cash in the bank: 5.21B vs. BTBFX (562M). FSIDX pays higher dividends than BTBFX: FSIDX (2.42) vs BTBFX (1.43). BTBFX was incepted earlier than FSIDX: BTBFX (30 years) vs FSIDX (22 years). BTBFX (0.80) is less costly to investors than FSIDX (0.67). FSIDX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 36.00 vs. BTBFX (7.52). FSIDX has a lower initial minimum investment than BTBFX: FSIDX (0) vs BTBFX (100000). FSIDX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.86 vs. BTBFX (5.25). FSIDX return over 5 years is better than : 36.35 vs. BTBFX (27.74).
| BTBFX | FSIDX | BTBFX / FSIDX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.80 | 0.67 | 119% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.80 | 0.67 | 119% |
| Fund Existence | 30 years | 22 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.187 | 7.344 | 57% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 100000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 562M | 5.21B | 11% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.43 | 2.42 | 59% |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.25 | 8.86 | 59% |
| Returns for 3 years | 16.14 | 21.97 | 73% |
| Returns for 5 years | 27.74 | 36.35 | 76% |
| Returns for 10 years | 70.09 | 49.68 | 141% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers