Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BTBFX vs FSIDX
BTBFX vs FSIDX Comparison
Open Charts BTBFX vs FSIDX
Boston Trust Asset Management
Price$63.77
Change+$0.37 (+0.58%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets562.33M
Fidelity Advisor Strategic Div & Inc I
Price$17.71
Change+$0.08 (+0.45%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets5.21B
BTBFX vs FSIDX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BTBFX vs. FSIDX commentary
Jul 05, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BTBFX is a Buy and FSIDX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSIDX has more cash in the bank: 5.21B vs. BTBFX (562M). FSIDX pays higher dividends than BTBFX: FSIDX (2.42) vs BTBFX (1.43). BTBFX was incepted earlier than FSIDX: BTBFX (30 years) vs FSIDX (22 years). BTBFX (0.80) is less costly to investors than FSIDX (0.67). FSIDX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 36.00 vs. BTBFX (7.52). FSIDX has a lower initial minimum investment than BTBFX: FSIDX (0) vs BTBFX (100000). FSIDX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.23 vs. BTBFX (3.30). FSIDX return over 5 years is better than : 38.30 vs. BTBFX (30.07).
| BTBFX | FSIDX | BTBFX / FSIDX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.80 | 0.67 | 119% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.80 | 0.67 | 119% |
| Fund Existence | 30 years | 22 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.489 | 6.192 | 56% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 100000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 562M | 5.21B | 11% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.43 | 2.42 | 59% |
| Returns for 1 year | 3.30 | 9.23 | 36% |
| Returns for 3 years | 17.35 | 22.53 | 77% |
| Returns for 5 years | 30.07 | 38.30 | 78% |
| Returns for 10 years | 70.61 | 48.91 | 144% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement