Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BTBFX vs FSIDX
BTBFX vs FSIDX Comparison
Open Charts BTBFX vs FSIDX
Boston Trust Asset Management
Price$61.72
Change-$0.55 (-0.88%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets551.12M
Fidelity Advisor Strategic Div & Inc I
Price$17.23
Change-$0.15 (-0.86%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets5.13B
BTBFX vs FSIDX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BTBFX vs. FSIDX commentary
Jun 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BTBFX is a Buy and FSIDX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSIDX has more cash in the bank: 5.13B vs. BTBFX (551M). FSIDX pays higher dividends than BTBFX: FSIDX (2.47) vs BTBFX (1.46). BTBFX was incepted earlier than FSIDX: BTBFX (30 years) vs FSIDX (21 years). BTBFX (0.80) is less costly to investors than FSIDX (0.67). FSIDX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 36.00 vs. BTBFX (7.52). FSIDX has a lower initial minimum investment than BTBFX: FSIDX (0) vs BTBFX (100000). FSIDX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.97 vs. BTBFX (1.69). FSIDX return over 5 years is better than : 38.20 vs. BTBFX (29.36).
| BTBFX | FSIDX | BTBFX / FSIDX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.80 | 0.67 | 119% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.80 | 0.67 | 119% |
| Fund Existence | 30 years | 21 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.055 | 4.213 | 25% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 100000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 551M | 5.13B | 11% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.46 | 2.47 | 59% |
| Returns for 1 year | 1.69 | 7.97 | 21% |
| Returns for 3 years | 17.78 | 24.07 | 74% |
| Returns for 5 years | 29.36 | 38.20 | 77% |
| Returns for 10 years | 65.92 | 43.80 | 151% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers