Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BTBFX vs FCSDX
BTBFX vs FCSDX Comparison
Open Charts BTBFX vs FCSDX
Boston Trust Asset Management
Price$63.77
Change+$0.37 (+0.58%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets562.33M
Fidelity Advisor Strategic Div & Inc C
Price$17.53
Change+$0.08 (+0.46%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets5.21B
BTBFX vs FCSDX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BTBFX vs. FCSDX commentary
Jul 05, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BTBFX is a Buy and FCSDX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FCSDX has more cash in the bank: 5.21B vs. BTBFX (562M). FCSDX (1.44) and BTBFX (1.43) have matching dividends . BTBFX was incepted earlier than FCSDX: BTBFX (30 years) vs FCSDX (22 years). FCSDX (1.67) is less costly to investors than BTBFX (0.80). FCSDX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 36.00 vs. BTBFX (7.52). FCSDX has a lower initial minimum investment than BTBFX: FCSDX (0) vs BTBFX (100000). FCSDX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.18 vs. BTBFX (3.30). FCSDX (31.39) and BTBFX (30.07) have equivalent 5 years return.
| BTBFX | FCSDX | BTBFX / FCSDX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.80 | 1.67 | 48% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.80 | 1.67 | 48% |
| Fund Existence | 30 years | 22 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.489 | 5.662 | 62% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 100000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 562M | 5.21B | 11% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.43 | 1.44 | 99% |
| Returns for 1 year | 3.30 | 8.18 | 40% |
| Returns for 3 years | 17.35 | 18.80 | 92% |
| Returns for 5 years | 30.07 | 31.39 | 96% |
| Returns for 10 years | 70.61 | 37.95 | 186% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement