BTBD
Price
$1.33
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Jun 27 closing price
Capitalization
8.19M
CFCGF
Price
$0.88
Change
-$0.01 (-1.12%)
Updated
Apr 16 closing price
Capitalization
N/A
Interact to see
Advertisement

BTBD vs CFCGF

Header iconBTBD vs CFCGF Comparison
Open Charts BTBD vs CFCGFBanner chart's image
BT Brands
Price$1.33
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$1.04K
Capitalization8.19M
Cafe de Coral Holdings
Price$0.88
Change-$0.01 (-1.12%)
Volume$596
CapitalizationN/A
BTBD vs CFCGF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
BTBD
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
CFCGF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BTBD vs. CFCGF commentary
Jun 30, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BTBD is a Buy and CFCGF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 30, 2025
Stock price -- (BTBD: $1.33 vs. CFCGF: $0.88)
Brand notoriety: BTBD and CFCGF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Restaurants industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BTBD: 37% vs. CFCGF: 100%
Market capitalization -- BTBD: $8.19M vs. CFCGF: $0
BTBD [@Restaurants] is valued at $8.19M. CFCGF’s [@Restaurants] market capitalization is $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Restaurants] industry ranges from $208.47B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Restaurants] industry is $8.13B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BTBD’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileCFCGF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • BTBD’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • CFCGF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, BTBD is a better buy in the long-term than CFCGF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BTBD’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while CFCGF’s TA Score has 1 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BTBD’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • CFCGF’s TA Score: 1 bullish, 0 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, CFCGF is a better buy in the short-term than BTBD.

Price Growth

BTBD (@Restaurants) experienced а -2.92% price change this week, while CFCGF (@Restaurants) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Restaurants industry was -0.36%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.15%, and the average quarterly price growth was -3.08%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Restaurants (-0.36% weekly)

The industry includes companies that operate full-service restaurants, fast food restaurants, cafeterias and snack bars. McDonald`s Corporation, Starbucks Corporation, YUM! Brands, Inc. and Restaurant Brands International Inc. are some of the largest U.S. restaurant-owning companies in terms of market capitalization. While restaurant spending could be viewed as discretionary for consumers, some companies in the business have been able to weather economic cycles by establishing strong loyalty among customers over the years. Many of them also have a strong global presence as well.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BTBD YTD gains are higher at: -7.639 vs. CFCGF (-14.398). CFCGF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 425M vs. BTBD (-1.04M). CFCGF has more cash in the bank: 1.07B vs. BTBD (3.82M). BTBD has less debt than CFCGF: BTBD (3.71M) vs CFCGF (2.33B). CFCGF has higher revenues than BTBD: CFCGF (8.64B) vs BTBD (14.9M).
BTBDCFCGFBTBD / CFCGF
Capitalization8.19MN/A-
EBITDA-1.04M425M-0%
Gain YTD-7.639-14.39853%
P/E RatioN/A25.13-
Revenue14.9M8.64B0%
Total Cash3.82M1.07B0%
Total Debt3.71M2.33B0%
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BTBDCFCGF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
82%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
89%
N/A
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
89%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
5%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
76%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
4%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
90%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
75%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
BTBD
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
CFCGF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
FRPH27.540.52
+1.92%
FRP Holdings
MRBK12.450.19
+1.55%
Meridian Corp
BAM55.12N/A
N/A
Brookfield Asset Management Ltd
CARV1.68N/A
-0.13%
Carver Bancorp
FORM34.91-0.35
-0.99%
FormFactor

BTBD and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that BTBD and ODDAF have been poorly correlated (+19% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that BTBD and ODDAF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BTBD
1D Price
Change %
BTBD100%
N/A
ODDAF - BTBD
19%
Poorly correlated
-11.77%
CNNE - BTBD
12%
Poorly correlated
+0.05%
THCH - BTBD
9%
Poorly correlated
+5.43%
BROS - BTBD
7%
Poorly correlated
+2.79%
FATBP - BTBD
7%
Poorly correlated
-2.74%
More

CFCGF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CFCGF and PTLO have been poorly correlated (+7% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CFCGF and PTLO's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CFCGF
1D Price
Change %
CFCGF100%
N/A
PTLO - CFCGF
7%
Poorly correlated
-0.09%
FWRG - CFCGF
4%
Poorly correlated
+7.04%
YOSH - CFCGF
2%
Poorly correlated
-0.01%
BTBD - CFCGF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
GAMN - CFCGF
-0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More