BTBD
Price
$1.53
Change
-$0.02 (-1.29%)
Updated
Dec 12 closing price
Capitalization
9.45M
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
CAVA
Price
$53.15
Change
+$0.50 (+0.95%)
Updated
Dec 12 closing price
Capitalization
6.16B
79 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

BTBD vs CAVA

Header iconBTBD vs CAVA Comparison
Open Charts BTBD vs CAVABanner chart's image
BT Brands
Price$1.53
Change-$0.02 (-1.29%)
Volume$7.26K
Capitalization9.45M
CAVA Group
Price$53.15
Change+$0.50 (+0.95%)
Volume$4.23M
Capitalization6.16B
BTBD vs CAVA Comparison Chart in %
BTBD
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
CAVA
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BTBD vs. CAVA commentary
Dec 14, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BTBD is a Buy and CAVA is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Dec 14, 2025
Stock price -- (BTBD: $1.55 vs. CAVA: $52.65)
Brand notoriety: BTBD and CAVA are both not notable
Both companies represent the Restaurants industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BTBD: 8% vs. CAVA: 63%
Market capitalization -- BTBD: $9.45M vs. CAVA: $6.16B
BTBD [@Restaurants] is valued at $9.45M. CAVA’s [@Restaurants] market capitalization is $6.16B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Restaurants] industry ranges from $225.55B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Restaurants] industry is $7.77B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BTBD’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileCAVA’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • BTBD’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • CAVA’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, both BTBD and CAVA are a bad buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BTBD’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while CAVA’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BTBD’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • CAVA’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, both BTBD and CAVA are a good buy in the short-term.

Price Growth

BTBD (@Restaurants) experienced а -0.64% price change this week, while CAVA (@Restaurants) price change was -3.36% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Restaurants industry was -1.11%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +3.16%, and the average quarterly price growth was -12.59%.

Reported Earning Dates

CAVA is expected to report earnings on Mar 03, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Restaurants (-1.11% weekly)

The industry includes companies that operate full-service restaurants, fast food restaurants, cafeterias and snack bars. McDonald`s Corporation, Starbucks Corporation, YUM! Brands, Inc. and Restaurant Brands International Inc. are some of the largest U.S. restaurant-owning companies in terms of market capitalization. While restaurant spending could be viewed as discretionary for consumers, some companies in the business have been able to weather economic cycles by establishing strong loyalty among customers over the years. Many of them also have a strong global presence as well.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CAVA($6.17B) has a higher market cap than BTBD($9.45M). BTBD YTD gains are higher at: 7.639 vs. CAVA (-53.324). CAVA has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 149M vs. BTBD (220K). CAVA has more cash in the bank: 388M vs. BTBD (4.74M). BTBD has less debt than CAVA: BTBD (3.74M) vs CAVA (443M). CAVA has higher revenues than BTBD: CAVA (1.13B) vs BTBD (14M).
BTBDCAVABTBD / CAVA
Capitalization9.45M6.17B0%
EBITDA220K149M0%
Gain YTD7.639-53.324-14%
P/E RatioN/A45.82-
Revenue14M1.13B1%
Total Cash4.74M388M1%
Total Debt3.74M443M1%
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BTBDCAVA
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
87%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
83%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
69%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
77%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
86%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
89%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
88%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
80%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
88%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
85%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 10 days ago
76%
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
84%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
83%
Bearish Trend 10 days ago
83%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
86%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
65%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
89%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
78%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
BTBD
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
CAVA
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
LYEL33.412.13
+6.81%
Lyell Immunopharma Inc
SRBK17.030.73
+4.48%
SR Bancorp
BAP281.614.61
+1.66%
Credicorp Ltd
XMTR61.620.37
+0.60%
Xometry
OST1.70N/A
N/A
Ostin Technology Group Co Ltd

BTBD and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that BTBD and JDWPF have been poorly correlated (+23% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that BTBD and JDWPF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BTBD
1D Price
Change %
BTBD100%
-1.27%
JDWPF - BTBD
23%
Poorly correlated
N/A
ARKR - BTBD
20%
Poorly correlated
+1.13%
CNNE - BTBD
12%
Poorly correlated
+2.03%
GENK - BTBD
11%
Poorly correlated
-0.85%
CAVA - BTBD
11%
Poorly correlated
-0.83%
More

CAVA and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CAVA has been loosely correlated with SG. These tickers have moved in lockstep 55% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CAVA jumps, then SG could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CAVA
1D Price
Change %
CAVA100%
-0.83%
SG - CAVA
55%
Loosely correlated
+2.71%
SHAK - CAVA
53%
Loosely correlated
+2.71%
KRUS - CAVA
49%
Loosely correlated
-2.09%
CAKE - CAVA
49%
Loosely correlated
+0.13%
CMG - CAVA
49%
Loosely correlated
+2.74%
More