BSXGF
Price
$0.43
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Feb 6 closing price
Capitalization
202.55M
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
VLCJF
Price
$0.12
Change
-$0.01 (-7.69%)
Updated
Oct 3 closing price
Capitalization
33.08M
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

BSXGF vs VLCJF

Header iconBSXGF vs VLCJF Comparison
Open Charts BSXGF vs VLCJFBanner chart's image
Belo Sun Mining
Price$0.43
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$1.46M
Capitalization202.55M
Velocity Minerals
Price$0.12
Change-$0.01 (-7.69%)
Volume$10K
Capitalization33.08M
BSXGF vs VLCJF Comparison Chart in %
BSXGF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
VLCJF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BSXGF vs. VLCJF commentary
Feb 08, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BSXGF is a Hold and VLCJF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Feb 08, 2026
Stock price -- (BSXGF: $0.43 vs. VLCJF: $0.14)
Brand notoriety: BSXGF and VLCJF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Precious Metals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BSXGF: 305% vs. VLCJF: 101%
Market capitalization -- BSXGF: $202.55M vs. VLCJF: $33.08M
BSXGF [@Precious Metals] is valued at $202.55M. VLCJF’s [@Precious Metals] market capitalization is $33.08M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Precious Metals] industry ranges from $140.39B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Precious Metals] industry is $4.32B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BSXGF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileVLCJF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • BSXGF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • VLCJF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, both BSXGF and VLCJF are a bad buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BSXGF’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while VLCJF’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BSXGF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 6 bearish.
  • VLCJF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, VLCJF is a better buy in the short-term than BSXGF.

Price Growth

BSXGF (@Precious Metals) experienced а -1.17% price change this week, while VLCJF (@Precious Metals) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Precious Metals industry was +165.92%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +11.98%, and the average quarterly price growth was +91.37%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Precious Metals (+165.92% weekly)

The Precious Metals industry is engaged in exploring/mining metals that are considered to be rare and/or have a high economic value. Popular precious metals include gold, platinum and silver - all three of which are largely used in jewelry, art and coinage alongwith having some industrial uses as well. Precious metals used in industrial processes include iridium, (used in specialty alloys), and palladium ( used in electronics and chemical applications). Historically, precious metals have traded at much higher prices than common industrial metals. Newmont Goldcorp Corp, Barrick Gold Corp and Freeport-McMoRan are few of the major precious metals producing companies in the U.S.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BSXGF($203M) has a higher market cap than VLCJF($33.1M). VLCJF YTD gains are higher at: 19.917 vs. BSXGF (13.270). VLCJF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -1.69M vs. BSXGF (-8.9M). BSXGF has more cash in the bank: 6.38M vs. VLCJF (2.88M). BSXGF (0) and VLCJF (0) have equivalent revenues.
BSXGFVLCJFBSXGF / VLCJF
Capitalization203M33.1M613%
EBITDA-8.9M-1.69M526%
Gain YTD13.27019.91767%
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
Revenue00-
Total Cash6.38M2.88M221%
Total DebtN/A15.1K-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BSXGF vs VLCJF: Fundamental Ratings
BSXGF
VLCJF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
50
Fair valued
50
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100100
SMR RATING
1..100
9794
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3644
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
100100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5075

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

BSXGF's Valuation (50) in the null industry is in the same range as VLCJF (50). This means that BSXGF’s stock grew similarly to VLCJF’s over the last 12 months.

BSXGF's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as VLCJF (100). This means that BSXGF’s stock grew similarly to VLCJF’s over the last 12 months.

VLCJF's SMR Rating (94) in the null industry is in the same range as BSXGF (97). This means that VLCJF’s stock grew similarly to BSXGF’s over the last 12 months.

BSXGF's Price Growth Rating (36) in the null industry is in the same range as VLCJF (44). This means that BSXGF’s stock grew similarly to VLCJF’s over the last 12 months.

BSXGF's P/E Growth Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as VLCJF (100). This means that BSXGF’s stock grew similarly to VLCJF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BSXGFVLCJF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
53%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
86%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
63%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
42%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
36%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
30%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
29%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 18 days ago
80%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
88%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
79%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
58%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
BSXGF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
VLCJF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
TGMPF4.000.20
+5.26%
Tantalus Systems Holding Inc.
IRLNX83.311.89
+2.32%
Voya Russell Large Cap Growth Idx Port I
VSORX50.811.03
+2.07%
Victory Sycamore Small Company Opp R6
AIQQX22.100.26
+1.19%
Aristotle Value Equity I-2
ROMJF0.33N/A
-0.76%
Rubicon Organics Inc.

BSXGF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that BSXGF and ORLA have been poorly correlated (+24% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that BSXGF and ORLA's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BSXGF
1D Price
Change %
BSXGF100%
-0.41%
ORLA - BSXGF
24%
Poorly correlated
+6.48%
EREPF - BSXGF
24%
Poorly correlated
N/A
DRD - BSXGF
23%
Poorly correlated
+6.32%
WPM - BSXGF
21%
Poorly correlated
+3.88%
AEM - BSXGF
21%
Poorly correlated
+3.77%
More

VLCJF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that VLCJF and EGMCF have been poorly correlated (+22% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that VLCJF and EGMCF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To VLCJF
1D Price
Change %
VLCJF100%
N/A
EGMCF - VLCJF
22%
Poorly correlated
-4.32%
VGMIF - VLCJF
15%
Poorly correlated
N/A
VLMZF - VLCJF
7%
Poorly correlated
N/A
VAUCF - VLCJF
6%
Poorly correlated
+6.48%
BSXGF - VLCJF
-8%
Poorly correlated
-0.41%