BSXGF
Price
$0.21
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Sep 25 closing price
Capitalization
98.64M
SMAGF
Price
$0.92
Change
+$0.02 (+2.22%)
Updated
Sep 25 closing price
Capitalization
108.45M
Interact to see
Advertisement

BSXGF vs SMAGF

Header iconBSXGF vs SMAGF Comparison
Open Charts BSXGF vs SMAGFBanner chart's image
Belo Sun Mining
Price$0.21
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$282.25K
Capitalization98.64M
Soma Gold
Price$0.92
Change+$0.02 (+2.22%)
Volume$263.14K
Capitalization108.45M
BSXGF vs SMAGF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
BSXGF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SMAGF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BSXGF vs. SMAGF commentary
Sep 27, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BSXGF is a Hold and SMAGF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 27, 2025
Stock price -- (BSXGF: $0.21 vs. SMAGF: $0.92)
Brand notoriety: BSXGF and SMAGF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Precious Metals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BSXGF: 166% vs. SMAGF: 304%
Market capitalization -- BSXGF: $98.64M vs. SMAGF: $108.45M
BSXGF [@Precious Metals] is valued at $98.64M. SMAGF’s [@Precious Metals] market capitalization is $108.45M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Precious Metals] industry ranges from $102.94B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Precious Metals] industry is $3.14B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BSXGF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileSMAGF’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • BSXGF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • SMAGF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, SMAGF is a better buy in the long-term than BSXGF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BSXGF’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SMAGF’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BSXGF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
  • SMAGF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, both BSXGF and SMAGF are a bad buy in the short-term.

Price Growth

BSXGF (@Precious Metals) experienced а -4.78% price change this week, while SMAGF (@Precious Metals) price change was +2.34% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Precious Metals industry was +3.52%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +27.71%, and the average quarterly price growth was +6008.39%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Precious Metals (+3.52% weekly)

The Precious Metals industry is engaged in exploring/mining metals that are considered to be rare and/or have a high economic value. Popular precious metals include gold, platinum and silver - all three of which are largely used in jewelry, art and coinage alongwith having some industrial uses as well. Precious metals used in industrial processes include iridium, (used in specialty alloys), and palladium ( used in electronics and chemical applications). Historically, precious metals have traded at much higher prices than common industrial metals. Newmont Goldcorp Corp, Barrick Gold Corp and Freeport-McMoRan are few of the major precious metals producing companies in the U.S.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SMAGF($108M) has a higher market cap than BSXGF($98.6M). BSXGF YTD gains are higher at: 239.344 vs. SMAGF (146.559). SMAGF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 41.1M vs. BSXGF (-8.98M). BSXGF has more cash in the bank: 8.45M vs. SMAGF (3.82M). SMAGF has higher revenues than BSXGF: SMAGF (98.2M) vs BSXGF (0).
BSXGFSMAGFBSXGF / SMAGF
Capitalization98.6M108M91%
EBITDA-8.98M41.1M-22%
Gain YTD239.344146.559163%
P/E RatioN/A12.69-
Revenue098.2M-
Total Cash8.45M3.82M221%
Total DebtN/A32.3M-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BSXGF vs SMAGF: Fundamental Ratings
BSXGF
SMAGF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
7421
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
60
Fair valued
69
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10032
SMR RATING
1..100
9818
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3540
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
10091
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
9050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

BSXGF's Valuation (60) in the null industry is in the same range as SMAGF (69). This means that BSXGF’s stock grew similarly to SMAGF’s over the last 12 months.

SMAGF's Profit vs Risk Rating (32) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for BSXGF (100). This means that SMAGF’s stock grew significantly faster than BSXGF’s over the last 12 months.

SMAGF's SMR Rating (18) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for BSXGF (98). This means that SMAGF’s stock grew significantly faster than BSXGF’s over the last 12 months.

BSXGF's Price Growth Rating (35) in the null industry is in the same range as SMAGF (40). This means that BSXGF’s stock grew similarly to SMAGF’s over the last 12 months.

SMAGF's P/E Growth Rating (91) in the null industry is in the same range as BSXGF (100). This means that SMAGF’s stock grew similarly to BSXGF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BSXGFSMAGF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
83%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
78%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
69%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
82%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
72%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
75%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
79%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 9 days ago
79%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
78%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
75%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
76%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
71%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
70%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
BSXGF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SMAGF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
RRGCX7.37N/A
N/A
DWS RREEF Global Real Estate Secc C
AXMIX16.01N/A
N/A
Acclivity Mid Cap Multi-Style I
PRPHX69.12N/A
N/A
Permanent Portfolio Permanent C
BVALX15.10N/A
N/A
Brown Advisory BeutelGoodmanLg-CpValInst
ICMPX17.79N/A
N/A
Lazard International Quality Gr Instl

BSXGF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that BSXGF and SMAGF have been poorly correlated (+21% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that BSXGF and SMAGF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BSXGF
1D Price
Change %
BSXGF100%
-1.43%
SMAGF - BSXGF
21%
Poorly correlated
+1.91%
WDOFF - BSXGF
11%
Poorly correlated
+2.29%
WFRSF - BSXGF
9%
Poorly correlated
N/A
WRRZF - BSXGF
4%
Poorly correlated
N/A
WTHVF - BSXGF
0%
Poorly correlated
+4.65%
More

SMAGF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SMAGF has been loosely correlated with TORXF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 35% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if SMAGF jumps, then TORXF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SMAGF
1D Price
Change %
SMAGF100%
N/A
TORXF - SMAGF
35%
Loosely correlated
N/A
STLRF - SMAGF
35%
Loosely correlated
N/A
PROBF - SMAGF
28%
Poorly correlated
N/A
LOMLF - SMAGF
28%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SNWGF - SMAGF
27%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More