Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BSTZ vs XLK
BSTZ vs XLK Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BSTZ vs. XLK commentary
Feb 05, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BSTZ is a Hold and XLK is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
XLK has more net assets: 87.3B vs. BSTZ (1.68B). BSTZ has a higher annual dividend yield than XLK: BSTZ (-2.000) vs XLK (-4.063). BSTZ was incepted earlier than XLK: BSTZ (7 years) vs XLK (27 years). XLK (0.08) has a lower expense ratio than BSTZ (1.32). BSTZ has a higher turnover XLK (5.00) vs XLK (5.00).
| BSTZ | XLK | BSTZ / XLK | |
| Gain YTD | -2.000 | -4.063 | 49% |
| Net Assets | 1.68B | 87.3B | 2% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.32 | 0.08 | 1,650% |
| Turnover | 19.00 | 5.00 | 380% |
| Yield | 0.00 | 0.54 | - |
| Fund Existence | 7 years | 27 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| BSTZ | XLK | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 90% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 81% | 2 days ago 83% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 86% | 2 days ago 81% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 86% | 2 days ago 82% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 82% | 2 days ago 84% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 9 days ago 89% | 9 days ago 87% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 85% | 2 days ago 82% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 87% | 2 days ago 90% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 90% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| DIHP | 33.52 | 0.15 | +0.46% |
| Dimensional International High Pbly ETF | |||
| IBTL | 20.42 | N/A | N/A |
| iShares iBonds Dec 2031 Term Tr ETF | |||
| PBFR | 29.34 | -0.03 | -0.10% |
| PGIM Laddered S&P 500 Buffer 20 ETF | |||
| ARLU | 30.42 | -0.15 | -0.49% |
| AllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer15 UncAprETF | |||
| PTH | 48.28 | -1.43 | -2.89% |
| Invesco Dorsey Wright Healthcare MomtETF | |||
BSTZ and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that BSTZ and JBL have been poorly correlated (+13% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that BSTZ and JBL's prices will move in lockstep.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To BSTZ | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BSTZ | 100% | -1.43% | ||
| JBL - BSTZ | 13% Poorly correlated | -2.94% | ||
| SNPS - BSTZ | 12% Poorly correlated | -0.04% | ||
| PSTG - BSTZ | 5% Poorly correlated | -1.61% | ||
| MDB - BSTZ | 2% Poorly correlated | -2.44% | ||
| NVDA - BSTZ | 1% Poorly correlated | -3.41% |
XLK and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, XLK has been closely correlated with TYL. These tickers have moved in lockstep 87% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if XLK jumps, then TYL could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To XLK | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| XLK | 100% | -2.79% | ||
| TYL - XLK | 87% Closely correlated | +3.37% | ||
| WDAY - XLK | 82% Closely correlated | +5.57% | ||
| HPQ - XLK | 79% Closely correlated | +4.32% | ||
| GDDY - XLK | 78% Closely correlated | +1.80% | ||
| LRCX - XLK | 78% Closely correlated | -8.83% | ||
More | ||||