Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BSTZ vs SMH
BSTZ vs SMH Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BSTZ vs. SMH commentary
Nov 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BSTZ is a Hold and SMH is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SMH has more net assets: 37.6B vs. BSTZ (1.67B). SMH has a higher annual dividend yield than BSTZ: SMH (46.810) vs BSTZ (21.691). BSTZ was incepted earlier than SMH: BSTZ (6 years) vs SMH (14 years). SMH (0.35) has a lower expense ratio than BSTZ (1.32). BSTZ has a higher turnover SMH (15.00) vs SMH (15.00).
| BSTZ | SMH | BSTZ / SMH | |
| Gain YTD | 21.691 | 46.810 | 46% |
| Net Assets | 1.67B | 37.6B | 4% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.32 | 0.35 | 377% |
| Turnover | 19.00 | 15.00 | 127% |
| Yield | 0.00 | 0.30 | - |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 14 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| BSTZ | SMH | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 80% | 2 days ago 80% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 87% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 87% | 2 days ago 89% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 88% | 2 days ago 86% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 86% | 2 days ago 85% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 87% | 2 days ago 90% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 17 days ago 89% | 17 days ago 90% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 7 days ago 86% | 7 days ago 82% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 85% | 2 days ago 90% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 90% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| CGBL | 35.04 | 0.09 | +0.26% |
| Capital Group Core Balanced ETF | |||
| CCNR | 32.50 | 0.05 | +0.16% |
| ALPS/CoreCommodity Natural Resources ETF | |||
| XTOC | 33.05 | 0.02 | +0.07% |
| Innovator US Equity Acclrtd Pls ETF™ Oct | |||
| ECOW | 25.57 | 0.01 | +0.03% |
| Pacer Emerging Markets Cash Cows 100 ETF | |||
| GRPM | 119.07 | -0.12 | -0.10% |
| Invesco S&P MidCap 400® GARP ETF | |||
BSTZ and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that BSTZ and JBL have been poorly correlated (+13% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that BSTZ and JBL's prices will move in lockstep.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To BSTZ | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BSTZ | 100% | +0.27% | ||
| JBL - BSTZ | 13% Poorly correlated | +1.35% | ||
| SNPS - BSTZ | 12% Poorly correlated | +0.81% | ||
| PSTG - BSTZ | 5% Poorly correlated | +1.27% | ||
| MDB - BSTZ | 2% Poorly correlated | -1.63% | ||
| NVDA - BSTZ | 1% Poorly correlated | +0.33% |
SMH and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SMH has been closely correlated with KLAC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 87% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if SMH jumps, then KLAC could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SMH | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SMH | 100% | +1.28% | ||
| KLAC - SMH | 87% Closely correlated | +0.68% | ||
| NVDA - SMH | 86% Closely correlated | +0.33% | ||
| TSM - SMH | 85% Closely correlated | -0.19% | ||
| LRCX - SMH | 81% Closely correlated | +1.41% | ||
| AMAT - SMH | 81% Closely correlated | +0.90% | ||
More | ||||