Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BSTZ vs SMH
BSTZ vs SMH Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BSTZ vs. SMH commentary
Dec 26, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BSTZ is a Hold and SMH is a Buy.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SMH has more net assets: 37.5B vs. BSTZ (1.74B). SMH has a higher annual dividend yield than BSTZ: SMH (50.378) vs BSTZ (23.409). BSTZ was incepted earlier than SMH: BSTZ (7 years) vs SMH (14 years). SMH (0.35) has a lower expense ratio than BSTZ (1.32). BSTZ has a higher turnover SMH (15.00) vs SMH (15.00).
| BSTZ | SMH | BSTZ / SMH | |
| Gain YTD | 23.409 | 50.378 | 46% |
| Net Assets | 1.74B | 37.5B | 5% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.32 | 0.35 | 377% |
| Turnover | 19.00 | 15.00 | 127% |
| Yield | 0.00 | 0.30 | - |
| Fund Existence | 7 years | 14 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| BSTZ | SMH | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 89% | 3 days ago 82% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 83% | 3 days ago 89% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 90% | 3 days ago 88% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 90% | 3 days ago 86% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 90% | 3 days ago 90% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 86% | 3 days ago 90% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 8 days ago 88% | 3 days ago 89% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 86% | 10 days ago 82% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | N/A | 3 days ago 90% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 90% | 3 days ago 86% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| INDS | 37.74 | 0.27 | +0.72% |
| Pacer Benchmark Industrial RE SCTR ETF | |||
| TEK | 30.34 | 0.09 | +0.29% |
| iShares Technology Opportunities Active ETF | |||
| IHI | 62.73 | 0.09 | +0.14% |
| iShares US Medical Devices ETF | |||
| VBND | 44.01 | 0.05 | +0.11% |
| Vident U.S. Bond Strategy ETF | |||
| SZNE | 35.58 | N/A | N/A |
| Pacer CFRA-Stovall Eq WghtSeasnlRottnETF | |||
BSTZ and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that BSTZ and JBL have been poorly correlated (+13% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that BSTZ and JBL's prices will move in lockstep.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To BSTZ | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BSTZ | 100% | +0.66% | ||
| JBL - BSTZ | 13% Poorly correlated | -0.25% | ||
| SNPS - BSTZ | 12% Poorly correlated | +0.06% | ||
| PSTG - BSTZ | 5% Poorly correlated | -0.42% | ||
| MDB - BSTZ | 2% Poorly correlated | -0.37% | ||
| NVDA - BSTZ | 1% Poorly correlated | -0.32% |
SMH and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SMH has been closely correlated with KLAC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 87% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if SMH jumps, then KLAC could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SMH | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SMH | 100% | +0.28% | ||
| KLAC - SMH | 87% Closely correlated | +0.65% | ||
| NVDA - SMH | 86% Closely correlated | -0.32% | ||
| TSM - SMH | 85% Closely correlated | +0.62% | ||
| LRCX - SMH | 82% Closely correlated | +1.24% | ||
| AMAT - SMH | 81% Closely correlated | +0.21% | ||
More | ||||