Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BSTZ vs SMH
BSTZ vs SMH Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BSTZ vs. SMH commentary
Feb 05, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BSTZ is a Hold and SMH is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SMH has more net assets: 41.6B vs. BSTZ (1.68B). SMH has a higher annual dividend yield than BSTZ: SMH (6.078) vs BSTZ (-2.000). BSTZ was incepted earlier than SMH: BSTZ (7 years) vs SMH (14 years). SMH (0.35) has a lower expense ratio than BSTZ (1.32). BSTZ has a higher turnover SMH (12.00) vs SMH (12.00).
| BSTZ | SMH | BSTZ / SMH | |
| Gain YTD | -2.000 | 6.078 | -33% |
| Net Assets | 1.68B | 41.6B | 4% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.32 | 0.35 | 377% |
| Turnover | 19.00 | 12.00 | 158% |
| Yield | 0.00 | 0.27 | - |
| Fund Existence | 7 years | 14 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| BSTZ | SMH | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 78% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 85% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 81% | 2 days ago 90% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 86% | 2 days ago 88% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 86% | 2 days ago 86% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 82% | 2 days ago 90% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 9 days ago 89% | 8 days ago 90% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 85% | 2 days ago 83% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 87% | 2 days ago 90% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 90% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| IEO | 101.82 | 3.13 | +3.17% |
| iShares US Oil & Gas Explor & Prod ETF | |||
| STXI | 32.85 | 0.09 | +0.27% |
| Strive International Developed Mkts ETF | |||
| EVTR | 51.40 | -0.06 | -0.12% |
| Eaton Vance Total Return Bond ETF | |||
| PWER | 39.66 | -0.13 | -0.32% |
| Nomura Energy Transition ETF | |||
| IWMY | 20.01 | -0.16 | -0.79% |
| Defiance R2000 Target 30 Weekly Dis ETF | |||
BSTZ and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that BSTZ and JBL have been poorly correlated (+13% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that BSTZ and JBL's prices will move in lockstep.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To BSTZ | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BSTZ | 100% | -1.43% | ||
| JBL - BSTZ | 13% Poorly correlated | -2.94% | ||
| SNPS - BSTZ | 12% Poorly correlated | -0.04% | ||
| PSTG - BSTZ | 5% Poorly correlated | -1.61% | ||
| MDB - BSTZ | 2% Poorly correlated | -2.44% | ||
| NVDA - BSTZ | 1% Poorly correlated | -3.41% |
SMH and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SMH has been closely correlated with NVDA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 86% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if SMH jumps, then NVDA could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SMH | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SMH | 100% | -3.94% | ||
| NVDA - SMH | 86% Closely correlated | -3.41% | ||
| LRCX - SMH | 86% Closely correlated | -8.83% | ||
| TSM - SMH | 84% Closely correlated | -2.98% | ||
| KLAC - SMH | 83% Closely correlated | -3.56% | ||
| AMAT - SMH | 81% Closely correlated | -6.61% | ||
More | ||||