Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BST vs SMH
BST vs SMH Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BST vs. SMH commentary
Jul 06, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BST is a Hold and SMH is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SMH has more net assets: 27.3B vs. BST (1.42B). SMH has a higher annual dividend yield than BST: SMH (17.116) vs BST (9.507). BST was incepted earlier than SMH: BST (11 years) vs SMH (14 years). SMH (0.35) has a lower expense ratio than BST (0.88). BST has a higher turnover SMH (18.00) vs SMH (18.00).
| BST | SMH | BST / SMH | |
| Gain YTD | 9.507 | 17.116 | 56% |
| Net Assets | 1.42B | 27.3B | 5% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.88 | 0.35 | 251% |
| Turnover | 19.00 | 18.00 | 106% |
| Yield | 0.00 | 0.38 | - |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 14 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| BST | SMH | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 79% | 4 days ago 90% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 86% | 4 days ago 90% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 79% | 4 days ago 88% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 84% | 4 days ago 90% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 87% | 4 days ago 90% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 86% | 4 days ago 90% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 89% | 4 days ago 89% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 17 days ago 82% | N/A |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 85% | 4 days ago 90% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 87% | 4 days ago 90% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
BST and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BST has been closely correlated with NVDA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 78% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if BST jumps, then NVDA could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To BST | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BST | 100% | +0.58% | ||
| NVDA - BST | 78% Closely correlated | +1.33% | ||
| AVGO - BST | 71% Closely correlated | +1.96% | ||
| MSFT - BST | 70% Closely correlated | +1.58% | ||
| CDNS - BST | 70% Closely correlated | +5.10% | ||
| AMZN - BST | 70% Closely correlated | +1.59% | ||
More | ||||
SMH and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SMH has been closely correlated with LRCX. These tickers have moved in lockstep 88% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if SMH jumps, then LRCX could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SMH | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SMH | 100% | +0.84% | ||
| LRCX - SMH | 88% Closely correlated | -0.02% | ||
| KLAC - SMH | 85% Closely correlated | +2.86% | ||
| AVGO - SMH | 82% Closely correlated | +1.96% | ||
| ASML - SMH | 82% Closely correlated | -0.64% | ||
| AMAT - SMH | 82% Closely correlated | N/A | ||
More | ||||