Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BST vs SMH
BST vs SMH Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BST vs. SMH commentary
Oct 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BST is a Hold and SMH is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SMH has more net assets: 33.8B vs. BST (1.52B). SMH has a higher annual dividend yield than BST: SMH (41.566) vs BST (21.021). BST was incepted earlier than SMH: BST (11 years) vs SMH (14 years). SMH (0.35) has a lower expense ratio than BST (0.88). BST has a higher turnover SMH (15.00) vs SMH (15.00).
| BST | SMH | BST / SMH | |
| Gain YTD | 21.021 | 41.566 | 51% |
| Net Assets | 1.52B | 33.8B | 4% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.88 | 0.35 | 251% |
| Turnover | 19.00 | 15.00 | 127% |
| Yield | 0.00 | 0.33 | - |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 14 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| BST | SMH | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 75% | 3 days ago 84% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 87% | 3 days ago 80% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 79% | N/A |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 79% | 3 days ago 90% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 86% | 3 days ago 90% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 86% | 3 days ago 90% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 11 days ago 87% | 4 days ago 90% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 82% | 10 days ago 83% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 90% | 3 days ago 90% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 88% | 3 days ago 90% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
BST and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BST has been closely correlated with NVDA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 79% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if BST jumps, then NVDA could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To BST | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BST | 100% | +0.15% | ||
| NVDA - BST | 79% Closely correlated | +0.78% | ||
| MSFT - BST | 69% Closely correlated | +0.39% | ||
| AMZN - BST | 68% Closely correlated | -0.67% | ||
| AVGO - BST | 68% Closely correlated | -1.36% | ||
| META - BST | 65% Loosely correlated | +0.68% | ||
More | ||||
SMH and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SMH has been closely correlated with LRCX. These tickers have moved in lockstep 86% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if SMH jumps, then LRCX could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SMH | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SMH | 100% | -0.14% | ||
| LRCX - SMH | 86% Closely correlated | -0.60% | ||
| NVDA - SMH | 86% Closely correlated | +0.78% | ||
| KLAC - SMH | 85% Closely correlated | +0.72% | ||
| TSM - SMH | 83% Closely correlated | -1.59% | ||
| AMAT - SMH | 81% Closely correlated | -1.20% | ||
More | ||||