Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BST vs SMH
BST vs SMH Comparison Chart
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BST vs. SMH commentary
Jun 16, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BST is a Hold and SMH is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SMH has more net assets: 24.4B vs. BST (1.34B). SMH has a higher annual dividend yield than BST: SMH (6.120) vs BST (5.000). BST was incepted earlier than SMH: BST (11 years) vs SMH (13 years). SMH (0.35) has a lower expense ratio than BST (0.88). BST has a higher turnover SMH (18.00) vs SMH (18.00).
| BST | SMH | BST / SMH | |
| Gain YTD | 5.000 | 6.120 | 82% |
| Net Assets | 1.34B | 24.4B | 6% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.88 | 0.35 | 251% |
| Turnover | 19.00 | 18.00 | 106% |
| Yield | 0.00 | 0.45 | - |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 13 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| BST | SMH | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 79% | 3 days ago 87% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 80% | 3 days ago 90% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | N/A | 3 days ago 84% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 88% | 3 days ago 90% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 84% | 3 days ago 90% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 86% | 3 days ago 90% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 89% | 6 days ago 89% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 82% | 25 days ago 84% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 90% | 3 days ago 86% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 87% | 3 days ago 90% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| MFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| ECIFX | 12.08 | -0.11 | -0.90% |
| Eaton Vance Balanced C | |||
| BSPGX | 701.41 | -7.90 | -1.11% |
| iShares S&P 500 Index G | |||
| MGGPX | 36.28 | -0.55 | -1.49% |
| Morgan Stanley Inst Global Opp A | |||
| ESGEX | 20.07 | -0.34 | -1.67% |
| Reynders McVeigh Core Equity Instl | |||
| ASMZX | 14.21 | -0.25 | -1.73% |
| Alger Weatherbie Specialized Growth Z | |||
BST and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BST has been closely correlated with NVDA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 77% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if BST jumps, then NVDA could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To BST | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BST | 100% | -0.70% | ||
| NVDA - BST | 77% Closely correlated | -2.09% | ||
| CDNS - BST | 71% Closely correlated | -2.55% | ||
| MSFT - BST | 70% Closely correlated | -0.82% | ||
| AVGO - BST | 70% Closely correlated | -2.88% | ||
| AMZN - BST | 69% Closely correlated | -0.53% | ||
More | ||||
SMH and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SMH has been closely correlated with LRCX. These tickers have moved in lockstep 89% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if SMH jumps, then LRCX could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SMH | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SMH | 100% | -2.34% | ||
| LRCX - SMH | 89% Closely correlated | -2.33% | ||
| KLAC - SMH | 85% Closely correlated | -0.84% | ||
| ASML - SMH | 82% Closely correlated | -3.21% | ||
| MPWR - SMH | 82% Closely correlated | -6.34% | ||
| AMAT - SMH | 82% Closely correlated | -2.52% | ||
More | ||||