Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BSPGX vs RWMFX
BSPGX vs RWMFX Comparison
Open Charts BSPGX vs RWMFX
iShares S&P 500 Index G
Price$747.86
Change+$3.00 (+0.40%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets50.39B
American Funds Washington Mutual R5
Price$65.33
Change+$0.27 (+0.42%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets204.03B
BSPGX vs RWMFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BSPGX vs. RWMFX commentary
Jul 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BSPGX is a Hold and RWMFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RWMFX has more cash in the bank: 204B vs. BSPGX (50.4B). RWMFX pays higher dividends than BSPGX: RWMFX (1.48) vs BSPGX (1.23). BSPGX was incepted earlier than RWMFX: BSPGX (6 years) vs RWMFX (23 years). RWMFX (0.31) is less costly to investors than BSPGX (0.01). RWMFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 29.00 vs. BSPGX (9.00). RWMFX has a lower initial minimum investment than BSPGX: RWMFX (250) vs BSPGX (2000000000). BSPGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 19.71 vs. RWMFX (9.60). BSPGX return over 5 years is better than : 111.47 vs. RWMFX (54.74).
| BSPGX | RWMFX | BSPGX / RWMFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.01 | 0.31 | 3% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.01 | 0.31 | 3% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.372 | 7.001 | 134% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000000000 | 250 | 800,000,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 50.4B | 204B | 25% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.23 | 1.48 | 83% |
| Returns for 1 year | 19.71 | 9.60 | 205% |
| Returns for 3 years | 69.83 | 32.33 | 216% |
| Returns for 5 years | 111.47 | 54.74 | 204% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 72.42 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers