Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BSPGX vs RWMFX
BSPGX vs RWMFX Comparison
Open Charts BSPGX vs RWMFX
iShares S&P 500 Index G
Price$734.72
Change+$6.19 (+0.85%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets50.09B
American Funds Washington Mutual R5
Price$64.56
Change+$0.53 (+0.83%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets202.05B
BSPGX vs RWMFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BSPGX vs. RWMFX commentary
Jul 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BSPGX is a Hold and RWMFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RWMFX has more cash in the bank: 202B vs. BSPGX (50.1B). RWMFX pays higher dividends than BSPGX: RWMFX (1.48) vs BSPGX (1.23). BSPGX was incepted earlier than RWMFX: BSPGX (6 years) vs RWMFX (23 years). RWMFX (0.31) is less costly to investors than BSPGX (0.01). RWMFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 31.00 vs. BSPGX (9.00). RWMFX has a lower initial minimum investment than BSPGX: RWMFX (250) vs BSPGX (2000000000). BSPGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 14.76 vs. RWMFX (7.88). BSPGX return over 5 years is better than : 113.58 vs. RWMFX (56.79).
| BSPGX | RWMFX | BSPGX / RWMFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.01 | 0.31 | 3% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.01 | 0.31 | 3% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.450 | 5.739 | 130% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000000000 | 250 | 800,000,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 50.1B | 202B | 25% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.23 | 1.48 | 83% |
| Returns for 1 year | 14.76 | 7.88 | 187% |
| Returns for 3 years | 70.69 | 32.20 | 220% |
| Returns for 5 years | 113.58 | 56.79 | 200% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 71.15 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers