Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BSPGX vs RWMFX
BSPGX vs RWMFX Comparison
Open Charts BSPGX vs RWMFX
iShares S&P 500 Index G
Price$780.02
Change+$4.11 (+0.53%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets51.47B
American Funds Washington Mutual R5
Price$66.77
Change+$0.28 (+0.42%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets205.87B
BSPGX vs RWMFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BSPGX vs. RWMFX commentary
Oct 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BSPGX is a Hold and RWMFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RWMFX has more cash in the bank: 206B vs. BSPGX (51.5B). RWMFX pays higher dividends than BSPGX: RWMFX (1.42) vs BSPGX (1.15). BSPGX was incepted earlier than RWMFX: BSPGX (6 years) vs RWMFX (23 years). RWMFX (0.31) is less costly to investors than BSPGX (0.01). RWMFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 29.00 vs. BSPGX (9.00). RWMFX has a lower initial minimum investment than BSPGX: RWMFX (250) vs BSPGX (2000000000). BSPGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 15.39 vs. RWMFX (4.12). BSPGX return over 5 years is better than : 103.40 vs. RWMFX (50.29).
| BSPGX | RWMFX | BSPGX / RWMFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.01 | 0.31 | 3% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.01 | 0.31 | 3% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 14.416 | 9.760 | 148% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000000000 | 250 | 800,000,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 51.5B | 206B | 25% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.15 | 1.42 | 82% |
| Returns for 1 year | 15.39 | 4.12 | 374% |
| Returns for 3 years | 86.51 | 41.84 | 207% |
| Returns for 5 years | 103.40 | 50.29 | 206% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 79.57 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement