Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BSPGX vs RWMFX
BSPGX vs RWMFX Comparison
Open Charts BSPGX vs RWMFX
iShares S&P 500 Index G
Price$805.27
Change+$17.09 (+2.17%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets54.33B
American Funds Washington Mutual R5
Price$66.14
Change-$1.03 (-1.53%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets208.21B
BSPGX vs RWMFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BSPGX vs. RWMFX commentary
Feb 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BSPGX is a Buy and RWMFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RWMFX has more cash in the bank: 208B vs. BSPGX (54.3B). RWMFX pays higher dividends than BSPGX: RWMFX (1.45) vs BSPGX (1.12). BSPGX was incepted earlier than RWMFX: BSPGX (7 years) vs RWMFX (24 years). RWMFX (0.31) is less costly to investors than BSPGX (0.01). RWMFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 29.00 vs. BSPGX (9.00). RWMFX has a lower initial minimum investment than BSPGX: RWMFX (250) vs BSPGX (2000000000). BSPGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 16.15 vs. RWMFX (5.51). BSPGX return over 5 years is better than : 88.70 vs. RWMFX (37.79).
| BSPGX | RWMFX | BSPGX / RWMFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.01 | 0.31 | 3% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.01 | 0.31 | 3% |
| Fund Existence | 7 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.139 | 1.520 | 75% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000000000 | 250 | 800,000,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 54.3B | 208B | 26% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.12 | 1.45 | 77% |
| Returns for 1 year | 16.15 | 5.51 | 293% |
| Returns for 3 years | 72.95 | 30.53 | 239% |
| Returns for 5 years | 88.70 | 37.79 | 235% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 98.02 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement