Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BSMKX vs FSSNX
BSMKX vs FSSNX Comparison
Open Charts BSMKX vs FSSNX
iShares Russell Small/Mid-Cap Idx K
Price$18.67
Change+$0.22 (+1.19%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.09B
Fidelity Small Cap Index
Price$31.60
Change+$0.60 (+1.94%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets29.3B
BSMKX vs FSSNX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BSMKX vs. FSSNX commentary
Dec 04, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BSMKX is a Buy and FSSNX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSSNX has more cash in the bank: 29.3B vs. BSMKX (1.09B). BSMKX pays higher dividends than FSSNX: BSMKX (1.43) vs FSSNX (0.80). BSMKX was incepted earlier than FSSNX: BSMKX (10 years) vs FSSNX (14 years). BSMKX (0.10) is less costly to investors than FSSNX (0.03). BSMKX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 43.00 vs. FSSNX (14.00). FSSNX has a lower initial minimum investment than BSMKX: FSSNX (0) vs BSMKX (5000000). FSSNX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 2.96 vs. BSMKX (2.08). FSSNX return over 5 years is better than : 39.68 vs. BSMKX (33.81).
| BSMKX | FSSNX | BSMKX / FSSNX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.08 | 0.03 | 320% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.10 | 0.03 | 400% |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.983 | 12.175 | 90% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 5000000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.09B | 29.3B | 4% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.43 | 0.80 | 180% |
| Returns for 1 year | 2.08 | 2.96 | 70% |
| Returns for 3 years | 31.71 | 36.77 | 86% |
| Returns for 5 years | 33.81 | 39.68 | 85% |
| Returns for 10 years | 117.42 | 105.61 | 111% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers