BSM
Price
$14.10
Change
-$0.10 (-0.70%)
Updated
Jan 15, 11:10 AM (EDT)
Capitalization
3.01B
40 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
FANG
Price
$151.60
Change
-$2.13 (-1.39%)
Updated
Jan 15, 11:26 AM (EDT)
Capitalization
44.05B
39 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

BSM vs FANG

Header iconBSM vs FANG Comparison
Open Charts BSM vs FANGBanner chart's image
Black Stone Minerals
Price$14.10
Change-$0.10 (-0.70%)
Volume$1.9K
Capitalization3.01B
Diamondback Energy
Price$151.60
Change-$2.13 (-1.39%)
Volume$5.87K
Capitalization44.05B
BSM vs FANG Comparison Chart in %
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BSM vs. FANG commentary
Jan 15, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BSM is a Hold and FANG is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jan 15, 2026
Stock price -- (BSM: $14.20 vs. FANG: $153.73)
Brand notoriety: BSM: Not notable vs. FANG: Notable
Both companies represent the Oil & Gas Production industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BSM: 47% vs. FANG: 142%
Market capitalization -- BSM: $3.01B vs. FANG: $44.05B
BSM [@Oil & Gas Production] is valued at $3.01B. FANG’s [@Oil & Gas Production] market capitalization is $44.05B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Oil & Gas Production] industry ranges from $123.99B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Oil & Gas Production] industry is $3.92B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BSM’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whileFANG’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • BSM’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
  • FANG’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, BSM is a better buy in the long-term than FANG.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BSM’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while FANG’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BSM’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
  • FANG’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, FANG is a better buy in the short-term than BSM.

Price Growth

BSM (@Oil & Gas Production) experienced а +6.13% price change this week, while FANG (@Oil & Gas Production) price change was +9.46% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Oil & Gas Production industry was +5.90%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.80%, and the average quarterly price growth was +12.56%.

Reported Earning Dates

BSM is expected to report earnings on Feb 24, 2026.

FANG is expected to report earnings on Feb 23, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Oil & Gas Production (+5.90% weekly)

The oil and gas production segment includes companies that specialize in exploration, development, and production of oil and natural gas. These companies are focused on upstream operations. Companies typically identify deposits, drill wells, and extract raw materials from underground. The industry also includes related services like rig operations, feasibility studies, machinery rentals etc. Several operators in this industry work with various types of contractors such as engineering procurement and construction contractors, as well as with joint-venture partners and oil field service companies. Oil and gas often involves large fixed costs of production; so, declining crude oil prices, for example, is a potential negative for this industry. Conoco Phillips, EOG Resources, Inc. and Pioneer Natural Resources Company are some examples of companies operating in this space.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FANG($44B) has a higher market cap than BSM($3.01B). BSM has higher P/E ratio than FANG: BSM (12.24) vs FANG (10.80). BSM YTD gains are higher at: 6.847 vs. FANG (2.262). FANG has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 10.8B vs. BSM (320M). FANG has more cash in the bank: 159M vs. BSM (2.86M). BSM has less debt than FANG: BSM (95M) vs FANG (16.2B). FANG has higher revenues than BSM: FANG (15.3B) vs BSM (431M).
BSMFANGBSM / FANG
Capitalization3.01B44B7%
EBITDA320M10.8B3%
Gain YTD6.8472.262303%
P/E Ratio12.2410.80113%
Revenue431M15.3B3%
Total Cash2.86M159M2%
Total Debt95M16.2B1%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BSM vs FANG: Fundamental Ratings
BSM
FANG
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
1469
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
10
Undervalued
94
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
1336
SMR RATING
1..100
4367
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5056
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
2346
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5545

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

BSM's Valuation (10) in the Oil And Gas Production industry is significantly better than the same rating for FANG (94). This means that BSM’s stock grew significantly faster than FANG’s over the last 12 months.

BSM's Profit vs Risk Rating (13) in the Oil And Gas Production industry is in the same range as FANG (36). This means that BSM’s stock grew similarly to FANG’s over the last 12 months.

BSM's SMR Rating (43) in the Oil And Gas Production industry is in the same range as FANG (67). This means that BSM’s stock grew similarly to FANG’s over the last 12 months.

BSM's Price Growth Rating (50) in the Oil And Gas Production industry is in the same range as FANG (56). This means that BSM’s stock grew similarly to FANG’s over the last 12 months.

BSM's P/E Growth Rating (23) in the Oil And Gas Production industry is in the same range as FANG (46). This means that BSM’s stock grew similarly to FANG’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BSMFANG
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
60%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
70%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
57%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
79%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
59%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
79%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
50%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
79%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
56%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
72%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
46%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
62%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
55%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
71%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 21 days ago
51%
Bearish Trend 9 days ago
58%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
74%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
79%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
36%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
57%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
BSM
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
FANG
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
MLXAX24.850.23
+0.93%
Catalyst Energy Infrastructure A
GTCSX31.200.20
+0.65%
Glenmede Small Cap Equity Adv
GEMSX28.690.01
+0.03%
Goldman Sachs Emerging Markets Eq Svc
GGEFX24.27-0.12
-0.49%
Summitry Equity Fund
JARTX50.90-0.69
-1.34%
Janus Henderson Forty S

BSM and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BSM has been closely correlated with OVV. These tickers have moved in lockstep 72% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if BSM jumps, then OVV could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BSM
1D Price
Change %
BSM100%
+0.07%
OVV - BSM
72%
Closely correlated
+2.13%
DVN - BSM
72%
Closely correlated
+2.93%
EOG - BSM
71%
Closely correlated
+2.50%
FANG - BSM
71%
Closely correlated
+1.67%
MGY - BSM
71%
Closely correlated
+1.51%
More

FANG and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FANG has been closely correlated with OVV. These tickers have moved in lockstep 90% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FANG jumps, then OVV could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FANG
1D Price
Change %
FANG100%
+1.67%
OVV - FANG
90%
Closely correlated
+2.13%
PR - FANG
90%
Closely correlated
+3.16%
DVN - FANG
90%
Closely correlated
+2.93%
CHRD - FANG
90%
Closely correlated
+1.42%
MTDR - FANG
88%
Closely correlated
+2.18%
More