| BSJS | HYLB | BSJS / HYLB | |
| Gain YTD | 7.278 | 7.689 | 95% |
| Net Assets | 538M | 4B | 13% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.42 | 0.05 | 840% |
| Turnover | 15.00 | 31.00 | 48% |
| Yield | 6.56 | 6.29 | 104% |
| Fund Existence | 5 years | 9 years | - |
| BSJS | HYLB | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 45% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 33% | 2 days ago 47% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 68% | 2 days ago 60% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 65% | 2 days ago 57% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 62% | 2 days ago 49% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 59% | 2 days ago 48% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 60% | 2 days ago 55% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 22 days ago 55% | 17 days ago 50% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 42% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 54% | 2 days ago 46% |
A.I.dvisor tells us that BSJS and NINE have been poorly correlated (+25% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that BSJS and NINE's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To BSJS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BSJS | 100% | +0.25% | ||
| NINE - BSJS | 25% Poorly correlated | -0.16% |