BSFFF
Price
$22.29
Change
+$3.24 (+17.01%)
Updated
May 6 closing price
Capitalization
2.24B
CLKXF
Price
$17.33
Change
+$2.37 (+15.84%)
Updated
Jun 30 closing price
Capitalization
305.7M
Interact to see
Advertisement

BSFFF vs CLKXF

Header iconBSFFF vs CLKXF Comparison
Open Charts BSFFF vs CLKXFBanner chart's image
Basic-Fit
Price$22.29
Change+$3.24 (+17.01%)
Volume$131
Capitalization2.24B
TWC Enterprises
Price$17.33
Change+$2.37 (+15.84%)
Volume$100
Capitalization305.7M
BSFFF vs CLKXF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
BSFFF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
CLKXF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BSFFF vs. CLKXF commentary
Jul 06, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BSFFF is a Hold and CLKXF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 06, 2025
Stock price -- (BSFFF: $22.29 vs. CLKXF: $17.33)
Brand notoriety: BSFFF and CLKXF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Recreational Products industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BSFFF: 60% vs. CLKXF: 82%
Market capitalization -- BSFFF: $2.24B vs. CLKXF: $305.7M
BSFFF [@Recreational Products] is valued at $2.24B. CLKXF’s [@Recreational Products] market capitalization is $305.7M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Recreational Products] industry ranges from $63.42B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Recreational Products] industry is $5.34B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BSFFF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileCLKXF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • BSFFF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • CLKXF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, CLKXF is a better buy in the long-term than BSFFF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BSFFF’s TA Score shows that 1 TA indicator(s) are bullish while CLKXF’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BSFFF’s TA Score: 1 bullish, 1 bearish.
  • CLKXF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 2 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, both BSFFF and CLKXF are a good buy in the short-term.

Price Growth

BSFFF (@Recreational Products) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while CLKXF (@Recreational Products) price change was +15.87% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Recreational Products industry was +4.20%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +20.60%, and the average quarterly price growth was +12.58%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Recreational Products (+4.20% weekly)

The Leisure and Recreation Products industry includes companies offering recreational goods/services such as video games, swimming pools, golf courses, boats, outdoor spaces etc. Since these are mainly geared towards consumers, strong employment conditions and healthy incomes generally augur well for the recreational products industry. Some of the largest market caps in this space belong to video game developers (e.g. Activision Blizzard, Electronic Arts and Take-two Interactive), and toy /board game makers (like Hasbro).

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BSFFF($2.24B) has a higher market cap than CLKXF($306M). CLKXF YTD gains are higher at: 35.709 vs. BSFFF (-4.540). BSFFF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 389M vs. CLKXF (139M). CLKXF has more cash in the bank: 117M vs. BSFFF (43.3M). CLKXF has less debt than BSFFF: CLKXF (105M) vs BSFFF (2.22B). BSFFF has higher revenues than CLKXF: BSFFF (795M) vs CLKXF (221M).
BSFFFCLKXFBSFFF / CLKXF
Capitalization2.24B306M731%
EBITDA389M139M280%
Gain YTD-4.54035.709-13%
P/E RatioN/A19.42-
Revenue795M221M360%
Total Cash43.3M117M37%
Total Debt2.22B105M2,113%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BSFFF vs CLKXF: Fundamental Ratings
BSFFF
CLKXF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
90
Overvalued
42
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
9243
SMR RATING
1..100
9378
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5439
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
7068
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
30n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

CLKXF's Valuation (42) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for BSFFF (90). This means that CLKXF’s stock grew somewhat faster than BSFFF’s over the last 12 months.

CLKXF's Profit vs Risk Rating (43) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for BSFFF (92). This means that CLKXF’s stock grew somewhat faster than BSFFF’s over the last 12 months.

CLKXF's SMR Rating (78) in the null industry is in the same range as BSFFF (93). This means that CLKXF’s stock grew similarly to BSFFF’s over the last 12 months.

CLKXF's Price Growth Rating (39) in the null industry is in the same range as BSFFF (54). This means that CLKXF’s stock grew similarly to BSFFF’s over the last 12 months.

CLKXF's P/E Growth Rating (68) in the null industry is in the same range as BSFFF (70). This means that CLKXF’s stock grew similarly to BSFFF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BSFFFCLKXF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
23%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
40%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
24%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
34%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
22%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
26%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
19%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
15%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
52%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
28%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
BSFFF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
CLKXF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
FADTX130.051.95
+1.52%
Fidelity Advisor Technology A
FIFWX24.930.25
+1.01%
Fidelity Advisor Founders Z
USRTX32.740.27
+0.83%
Horizon Multi-Factor U.S. Equity Advisor
SLASX38.650.23
+0.60%
Selected American Shares S
RYBIX83.260.02
+0.02%
Rydex Basic Materials Inv

BSFFF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that BSFFF and ANPDY have been poorly correlated (+7% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that BSFFF and ANPDY's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BSFFF
1D Price
Change %
BSFFF100%
N/A
ANPDY - BSFFF
7%
Poorly correlated
-0.34%
GYYMF - BSFFF
6%
Poorly correlated
N/A
ANPDF - BSFFF
6%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CUKPF - BSFFF
1%
Poorly correlated
+6.71%
CLKXF - BSFFF
1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

CLKXF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CLKXF and KENS have been poorly correlated (+6% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CLKXF and KENS's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CLKXF
1D Price
Change %
CLKXF100%
N/A
KENS - CLKXF
6%
Poorly correlated
+152.94%
ANPDY - CLKXF
4%
Poorly correlated
-0.34%
CUKPF - CLKXF
4%
Poorly correlated
+6.71%
BSFFF - CLKXF
1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
FOCIF - CLKXF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More