BSEFY
Price
$15.10
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Jul 12 closing price
Capitalization
90
CNGO
Price
$23.50
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Jun 10 closing price
Capitalization
1.47B
Interact to see
Advertisement

BSEFY vs CNGO

Header iconBSEFY vs CNGO Comparison
Open Charts BSEFY vs CNGOBanner chart's image
Benesse Holdings
Price$15.10
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$116
Capitalization90
Cengage Learning Holdings II
Price$23.50
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$200K
Capitalization1.47B
BSEFY vs CNGO Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BSEFY vs. CNGO commentary
Sep 06, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BSEFY is a Buy and CNGO is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 06, 2025
Stock price -- (BSEFY: $15.10 vs. CNGO: $23.50)
Brand notoriety: BSEFY and CNGO are both not notable
Both companies represent the Other Consumer Specialties industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BSEFY: 100% vs. CNGO: 100%
Market capitalization -- BSEFY: $90 vs. CNGO: $1.47B
BSEFY [@Other Consumer Specialties] is valued at $90. CNGO’s [@Other Consumer Specialties] market capitalization is $1.47B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Other Consumer Specialties] industry ranges from $8.45B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Other Consumer Specialties] industry is $1.18B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BSEFY’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileCNGO’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • BSEFY’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • CNGO’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, BSEFY is a better buy in the long-term than CNGO.

Price Growth

BSEFY (@Other Consumer Specialties) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while CNGO (@Other Consumer Specialties) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Other Consumer Specialties industry was +1.02%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +3.64%, and the average quarterly price growth was +21.28%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Other Consumer Specialties (+1.02% weekly)

‘Other Consumer Specialties’ represents an industry that typically sells durable consumer products, but do not have a classification in another category. The products include jewelry, smoke detectors, watches, collectibles and safety products. MSA Safety (makes products which enhances the safety and health of workers and protect facility infrastructures), Matthews International (memorialization business), Fitbit (makes wireless-enabled wearable technology devices that gauge data such as the number of steps walked, heart rate, quality of sleep), and Fossil Group (makes watches and accessories) have some of the largest market caps in this group.

FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CNGO($1.47B) has a higher market cap than BSEFY($90). CNGO YTD gains are higher at: 20.513 vs. BSEFY (0.000).
BSEFYCNGOBSEFY / CNGO
Capitalization901.47B0%
EBITDAN/A249M-
Gain YTD0.00020.513-
P/E Ratio24.41N/A-
RevenueN/A1.48B-
Total CashN/A256M-
Total DebtN/A1.67B-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BSEFY vs CNGO: Fundamental Ratings
BSEFY
CNGO
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
4350
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
35
Fair valued
81
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10028
SMR RATING
1..100
1100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
7251
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
9568
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

BSEFY's Valuation (35) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CNGO (81). This means that BSEFY’s stock grew somewhat faster than CNGO’s over the last 12 months.

CNGO's Profit vs Risk Rating (28) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for BSEFY (100). This means that CNGO’s stock grew significantly faster than BSEFY’s over the last 12 months.

BSEFY's SMR Rating (1) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for CNGO (100). This means that BSEFY’s stock grew significantly faster than CNGO’s over the last 12 months.

CNGO's Price Growth Rating (51) in the null industry is in the same range as BSEFY (72). This means that CNGO’s stock grew similarly to BSEFY’s over the last 12 months.

CNGO's P/E Growth Rating (68) in the null industry is in the same range as BSEFY (95). This means that CNGO’s stock grew similarly to BSEFY’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BSEFYCNGO
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
27%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
21%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
23%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
20%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
SUFCX39.960.09
+0.23%
NAA Mid Growth C
GAOCX21.27N/A
N/A
JPMorgan Global Allocation C
BRSBX14.70N/A
N/A
MFS Blended Research Small Cap Eq B
MMPDX34.73N/A
N/A
NYLI WMC Value Class R6
MINJX44.38N/A
N/A
MFS International Intrinsic Value R6

BSEFY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BSEFY has been loosely correlated with CPBLF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 33% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if BSEFY jumps, then CPBLF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BSEFY
1D Price
Change %
BSEFY100%
N/A
CPBLF - BSEFY
33%
Loosely correlated
N/A
RTO - BSEFY
22%
Poorly correlated
+1.59%
CNGO - BSEFY
11%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SPIR - BSEFY
8%
Poorly correlated
+1.26%
BGPBF - BSEFY
7%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

CNGO and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CNGO and WTLLF have been poorly correlated (+29% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CNGO and WTLLF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CNGO
1D Price
Change %
CNGO100%
N/A
WTLLF - CNGO
29%
Poorly correlated
N/A
RTO - CNGO
24%
Poorly correlated
+1.59%
STGXF - CNGO
22%
Poorly correlated
N/A
BSEFY - CNGO
11%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CBMJ - CNGO
2%
Poorly correlated
+17.65%
More