Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BSCMX vs SSGSX
BSCMX vs SSGSX Comparison
Open Charts BSCMX vs SSGSX
Brandes Small Cap Value I
Price$18.45
Change+$0.20 (+1.10%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets159.52M
Victory Sycamore Small Company Opp A
Price$45.47
Change+$0.28 (+0.62%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets5.82B
BSCMX vs SSGSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BSCMX vs. SSGSX commentary
Jul 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BSCMX is a Buy and SSGSX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SSGSX has more cash in the bank: 5.82B vs. BSCMX (160M). SSGSX pays higher dividends than BSCMX: SSGSX (0.51) vs BSCMX (0.35). BSCMX was incepted earlier than SSGSX: BSCMX (8 years) vs SSGSX (26 years). SSGSX (1.26) is less costly to investors than BSCMX (1.19). BSCMX (38.36) and SSGSX (37.00) have comparable annual turnover. SSGSX has a lower initial minimum investment than BSCMX: SSGSX (2500) vs BSCMX (100000). BSCMX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 23.37 vs. SSGSX (-1.26). BSCMX return over 5 years is better than : 137.91 vs. SSGSX (29.33).
| BSCMX | SSGSX | BSCMX / SSGSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.91 | 1.26 | 72% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.19 | 1.26 | 94% |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 26 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.872 | -2.068 | -429% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 100000 | 2500 | 4,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 160M | 5.82B | 3% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.35 | 0.51 | 69% |
| Returns for 1 year | 23.37 | -1.26 | -1,853% |
| Returns for 3 years | 63.24 | 2.38 | 2,658% |
| Returns for 5 years | 137.91 | 29.33 | 470% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 16.52 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers