Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BSCMX vs DFFVX
BSCMX vs DFFVX Comparison
Open Charts BSCMX vs DFFVX
Brandes Small Cap Value I
Price$22.15
Change+$2.46 (+12.49%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets365.31M
DFA US Targeted Value I
Price$40.19
Change+$4.46 (+12.48%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets14.92B
BSCMX vs DFFVX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BSCMX vs. DFFVX commentary
Feb 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BSCMX is a Hold and DFFVX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
DFFVX has more cash in the bank: 14.9B vs. BSCMX (365M). DFFVX pays higher dividends than BSCMX: DFFVX (1.58) vs BSCMX (0.50). BSCMX was incepted earlier than DFFVX: BSCMX (8 years) vs DFFVX (26 years). BSCMX (0.99) is less costly to investors than DFFVX (0.30). BSCMX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 22.02 vs. DFFVX (10.00). DFFVX has a lower initial minimum investment than BSCMX: DFFVX (0) vs BSCMX (100000). BSCMX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 29.46 vs. DFFVX (17.44). BSCMX return over 5 years is better than : 103.61 vs. DFFVX (62.65).
| BSCMX | DFFVX | BSCMX / DFFVX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.91 | 0.29 | 314% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.99 | 0.30 | 330% |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 26 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.529 | 8.680 | 121% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 100000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 365M | 14.9B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.50 | 1.58 | 32% |
| Returns for 1 year | 29.46 | 17.44 | 169% |
| Returns for 3 years | 76.41 | 37.63 | 203% |
| Returns for 5 years | 103.61 | 62.65 | 165% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 141.58 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers