Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BSCMX vs DFFVX
BSCMX vs DFFVX Comparison
Open Charts BSCMX vs DFFVX
Brandes Small Cap Value I
Price$19.96
Change+$0.02 (+0.10%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets262.17M
DFA US Targeted Value I
Price$35.84
Change+$0.10 (+0.28%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets13.48B
BSCMX vs DFFVX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BSCMX vs. DFFVX commentary
Nov 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BSCMX is a Hold and DFFVX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
DFFVX has more cash in the bank: 13.5B vs. BSCMX (262M). DFFVX pays higher dividends than BSCMX: DFFVX (1.72) vs BSCMX (0.39). BSCMX was incepted earlier than DFFVX: BSCMX (8 years) vs DFFVX (26 years). BSCMX (0.99) is less costly to investors than DFFVX (0.30). BSCMX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 22.02 vs. DFFVX (7.00). DFFVX has a lower initial minimum investment than BSCMX: DFFVX (0) vs BSCMX (100000). BSCMX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 13.65 vs. DFFVX (-0.18). BSCMX return over 5 years is better than : 115.44 vs. DFFVX (79.20).
| BSCMX | DFFVX | BSCMX / DFFVX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.91 | 0.29 | 314% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.99 | 0.30 | 330% |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 26 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 17.926 | 5.769 | 311% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 100000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 262M | 13.5B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.39 | 1.72 | 22% |
| Returns for 1 year | 13.65 | -0.18 | -7,469% |
| Returns for 3 years | 71.79 | 25.69 | 280% |
| Returns for 5 years | 115.44 | 79.20 | 146% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 80.67 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers