BSAC
Price
$36.13
Change
+$0.24 (+0.67%)
Updated
Feb 5 closing price
Capitalization
17.05B
77 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
WF
Price
$65.51
Change
+$0.20 (+0.31%)
Updated
Feb 5 closing price
Capitalization
16.1B
Earnings call today
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

BSAC vs WF

Header iconBSAC vs WF Comparison
Open Charts BSAC vs WFBanner chart's image
Banco Santander-Chile
Price$36.13
Change+$0.24 (+0.67%)
Volume$363.98K
Capitalization17.05B
Woori Financial Group
Price$65.51
Change+$0.20 (+0.31%)
Volume$48.34K
Capitalization16.1B
BSAC vs WF Comparison Chart in %
BSAC
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
WF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BSAC vs. WF commentary
Feb 06, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BSAC is a Buy and WF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Feb 06, 2026
Stock price -- (BSAC: $35.89 vs. WF: $65.31)
Brand notoriety: BSAC and WF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BSAC: 100% vs. WF: 95%
Market capitalization -- BSAC: $17.05B vs. WF: $16.1B
BSAC [@Regional Banks] is valued at $17.05B. WF’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $16.1B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $161.58B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $9.38B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BSAC’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whileWF’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).

  • BSAC’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
  • WF’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
According to our system of comparison, WF is a better buy in the long-term than BSAC.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BSAC’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while WF’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BSAC’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • WF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, WF is a better buy in the short-term than BSAC.

Price Growth

BSAC (@Regional Banks) experienced а -2.50% price change this week, while WF (@Regional Banks) price change was +3.68% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +2.36%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +5.80%, and the average quarterly price growth was +19.28%.

Reported Earning Dates

BSAC is expected to report earnings on Apr 24, 2026.

WF is expected to report earnings on Feb 06, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+2.36% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BSAC($17.1B) has a higher market cap than WF($16.1B). BSAC has higher P/E ratio than WF: BSAC (13.93) vs WF (7.58). BSAC YTD gains are higher at: 16.136 vs. WF (11.431). BSAC has less debt than WF: BSAC (14.48T) vs WF (83.28T). WF has higher revenues than BSAC: WF (12.92T) vs BSAC (2.78T).
BSACWFBSAC / WF
Capitalization17.1B16.1B106%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD16.13611.431141%
P/E Ratio13.937.58184%
Revenue2.78T12.92T22%
Total CashN/AN/A-
Total Debt14.48T83.28T17%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BSAC vs WF: Fundamental Ratings
BSAC
WF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
2216
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
84
Overvalued
56
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
2011
SMR RATING
1..100
11
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3941
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
2812
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
8565

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

WF's Valuation (56) in the Major Banks industry is in the same range as BSAC (84) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that WF’s stock grew similarly to BSAC’s over the last 12 months.

WF's Profit vs Risk Rating (11) in the Major Banks industry is in the same range as BSAC (20) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that WF’s stock grew similarly to BSAC’s over the last 12 months.

WF's SMR Rating (1) in the Major Banks industry is in the same range as BSAC (1) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that WF’s stock grew similarly to BSAC’s over the last 12 months.

BSAC's Price Growth Rating (39) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as WF (41) in the Major Banks industry. This means that BSAC’s stock grew similarly to WF’s over the last 12 months.

WF's P/E Growth Rating (12) in the Major Banks industry is in the same range as BSAC (28) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that WF’s stock grew similarly to BSAC’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BSACWF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
62%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
44%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
60%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
51%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
65%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
60%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
71%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
52%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
66%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
65%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
66%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
67%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
64%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 22 days ago
54%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
51%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
62%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
63%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
63%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
BSAC
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
WF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
IPB26.000.39
+1.51%
Merrill Lynch Depositor
BLST25.340.07
+0.26%
Bluemonte Short Term Bond ETF
MCI20.50-0.01
-0.07%
Barings Corporate Investors
TMFS34.75-0.44
-1.25%
Motley Fool Small-Cap Growth ETF
IAI173.97-3.92
-2.20%
iShares US Broker-Dealers&Secs Exchs ETF

BSAC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BSAC has been closely correlated with CIB. These tickers have moved in lockstep 84% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if BSAC jumps, then CIB could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BSAC
1D Price
Change %
BSAC100%
+0.67%
CIB - BSAC
84%
Closely correlated
-2.09%
LYG - BSAC
80%
Closely correlated
-5.68%
BCH - BSAC
79%
Closely correlated
-1.59%
IFS - BSAC
77%
Closely correlated
+0.44%
MOFG - BSAC
73%
Closely correlated
+0.44%
More

WF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, WF has been closely correlated with SHG. These tickers have moved in lockstep 80% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if WF jumps, then SHG could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To WF
1D Price
Change %
WF100%
+0.31%
SHG - WF
80%
Closely correlated
+2.05%
KB - WF
75%
Closely correlated
+1.61%
BSAC - WF
52%
Loosely correlated
+0.67%
BCH - WF
51%
Loosely correlated
-1.59%
MFG - WF
51%
Loosely correlated
-3.12%
More