BSAC
Price
$24.21
Change
+$0.17 (+0.71%)
Updated
Aug 15 closing price
Capitalization
11.43B
74 days until earnings call
WF
Price
$54.77
Change
-$0.31 (-0.56%)
Updated
Aug 15 closing price
Capitalization
13.53B
67 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

BSAC vs WF

Header iconBSAC vs WF Comparison
Open Charts BSAC vs WFBanner chart's image
Banco Santander-Chile
Price$24.21
Change+$0.17 (+0.71%)
Volume$296.54K
Capitalization11.43B
Woori Financial Group
Price$54.77
Change-$0.31 (-0.56%)
Volume$29.28K
Capitalization13.53B
BSAC vs WF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
BSAC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
WF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BSAC vs. WF commentary
Aug 17, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BSAC is a Hold and WF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 17, 2025
Stock price -- (BSAC: $24.21 vs. WF: $54.77)
Brand notoriety: BSAC and WF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BSAC: 79% vs. WF: 42%
Market capitalization -- BSAC: $11.43B vs. WF: $13.53B
BSAC [@Regional Banks] is valued at $11.43B. WF’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $13.53B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $174.7B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $7.93B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BSAC’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileWF’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).

  • BSAC’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • WF’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
According to our system of comparison, WF is a better buy in the long-term than BSAC.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BSAC’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while WF’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BSAC’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • WF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, BSAC is a better buy in the short-term than WF.

Price Growth

BSAC (@Regional Banks) experienced а +0.67% price change this week, while WF (@Regional Banks) price change was +0.07% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +1.64%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.46%, and the average quarterly price growth was +8.68%.

Reported Earning Dates

BSAC is expected to report earnings on Oct 30, 2025.

WF is expected to report earnings on Oct 23, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+1.64% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
WF($13.5B) has a higher market cap than BSAC($11.4B). BSAC has higher P/E ratio than WF: BSAC (10.19) vs WF (6.82). WF YTD gains are higher at: 77.307 vs. BSAC (35.738). BSAC has less debt than WF: BSAC (10.68T) vs WF (79.95T). WF has higher revenues than BSAC: WF (12.73T) vs BSAC (2.8T).
BSACWFBSAC / WF
Capitalization11.4B13.5B84%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD35.73877.30746%
P/E Ratio10.196.82149%
Revenue2.8T12.73T22%
Total CashN/AN/A-
Total Debt10.68T79.95T13%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BSAC vs WF: Fundamental Ratings
BSAC
WF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
204
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
81
Overvalued
66
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
3313
SMR RATING
1..100
11
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5139
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
8316
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
26n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

WF's Valuation (66) in the Major Banks industry is in the same range as BSAC (81) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that WF’s stock grew similarly to BSAC’s over the last 12 months.

WF's Profit vs Risk Rating (13) in the Major Banks industry is in the same range as BSAC (33) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that WF’s stock grew similarly to BSAC’s over the last 12 months.

WF's SMR Rating (1) in the Major Banks industry is in the same range as BSAC (1) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that WF’s stock grew similarly to BSAC’s over the last 12 months.

WF's Price Growth Rating (39) in the Major Banks industry is in the same range as BSAC (51) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that WF’s stock grew similarly to BSAC’s over the last 12 months.

WF's P/E Growth Rating (16) in the Major Banks industry is significantly better than the same rating for BSAC (83) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that WF’s stock grew significantly faster than BSAC’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BSACWF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
56%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
57%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
65%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
48%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
67%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
63%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
69%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
60%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
64%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
67%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
65%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
53%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
66%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
65%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
57%
Bearish Trend 17 days ago
55%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
66%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
63%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
52%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
62%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
BSAC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
WF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
GREK66.890.36
+0.54%
Global X MSCI Greece ETF
HYLS42.030.11
+0.26%
First Trust Tactical High Yield ETF
IHYF22.710.03
+0.13%
Invesco High Yield Bond Factor ETF
LDRT25.22N/A
N/A
iShares iBonds 1-5 Year Treasury Ladder ETF
TMET24.26-0.07
-0.29%
iShares Transition-Enabling Metals ETF

BSAC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BSAC has been closely correlated with BCH. These tickers have moved in lockstep 83% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if BSAC jumps, then BCH could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BSAC
1D Price
Change %
BSAC100%
+0.71%
BCH - BSAC
83%
Closely correlated
+1.10%
BAP - BSAC
55%
Loosely correlated
+0.61%
CIB - BSAC
54%
Loosely correlated
+2.00%
IFS - BSAC
54%
Loosely correlated
-0.13%
LYG - BSAC
53%
Loosely correlated
-1.31%
More

WF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, WF has been closely correlated with SHG. These tickers have moved in lockstep 78% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if WF jumps, then SHG could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To WF
1D Price
Change %
WF100%
-0.56%
SHG - WF
78%
Closely correlated
-0.04%
KB - WF
73%
Closely correlated
N/A
NWG - WF
38%
Loosely correlated
-2.24%
BSAC - WF
36%
Loosely correlated
+0.71%
BCH - WF
36%
Loosely correlated
+1.10%
More