BSAC
Price
$25.65
Change
+$0.63 (+2.52%)
Updated
Sep 5 closing price
Capitalization
11.9B
54 days until earnings call
IFS
Price
$40.84
Change
+$0.10 (+0.25%)
Updated
Sep 5 closing price
Capitalization
4.53B
61 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

BSAC vs IFS

Header iconBSAC vs IFS Comparison
Open Charts BSAC vs IFSBanner chart's image
Banco Santander-Chile
Price$25.65
Change+$0.63 (+2.52%)
Volume$311.67K
Capitalization11.9B
Intercorp Financial Services
Price$40.84
Change+$0.10 (+0.25%)
Volume$127.05K
Capitalization4.53B
BSAC vs IFS Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
BSAC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
IFS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BSAC vs. IFS commentary
Sep 06, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BSAC is a StrongBuy and IFS is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 06, 2025
Stock price -- (BSAC: $25.65 vs. IFS: $40.84)
Brand notoriety: BSAC and IFS are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BSAC: 102% vs. IFS: 66%
Market capitalization -- BSAC: $11.9B vs. IFS: $4.53B
BSAC [@Regional Banks] is valued at $11.9B. IFS’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $4.53B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $167.72B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $7.78B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BSAC’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileIFS’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).

  • BSAC’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • IFS’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
According to our system of comparison, IFS is a better buy in the long-term than BSAC.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BSAC’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while IFS’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BSAC’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • IFS’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, IFS is a better buy in the short-term than BSAC.

Price Growth

BSAC (@Regional Banks) experienced а +6.70% price change this week, while IFS (@Regional Banks) price change was +2.82% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +0.38%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.97%, and the average quarterly price growth was +13.09%.

Reported Earning Dates

BSAC is expected to report earnings on Oct 30, 2025.

IFS is expected to report earnings on Nov 06, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+0.38% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BSAC($11.9B) has a higher market cap than IFS($4.53B). BSAC has higher P/E ratio than IFS: BSAC (11.01) vs IFS (8.95). BSAC (43.812) and IFS (43.656) have similar YTD gains . IFS has less debt than BSAC: IFS (12B) vs BSAC (10.68T). BSAC has higher revenues than IFS: BSAC (2.8T) vs IFS (6.94B).
BSACIFSBSAC / IFS
Capitalization11.9B4.53B262%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD43.81243.656100%
P/E Ratio11.018.95123%
Revenue2.8T6.94B40,311%
Total CashN/AN/A-
Total Debt10.68T12B88,975%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BSAC vs IFS: Fundamental Ratings
BSAC
IFS
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
2416
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
83
Overvalued
31
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
2828
SMR RATING
1..100
17
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4841
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
7679
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
7550

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

IFS's Valuation (31) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for BSAC (83) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that IFS’s stock grew somewhat faster than BSAC’s over the last 12 months.

IFS's Profit vs Risk Rating (28) in the null industry is in the same range as BSAC (28) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that IFS’s stock grew similarly to BSAC’s over the last 12 months.

BSAC's SMR Rating (1) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as IFS (7) in the null industry. This means that BSAC’s stock grew similarly to IFS’s over the last 12 months.

IFS's Price Growth Rating (41) in the null industry is in the same range as BSAC (48) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that IFS’s stock grew similarly to BSAC’s over the last 12 months.

BSAC's P/E Growth Rating (76) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as IFS (79) in the null industry. This means that BSAC’s stock grew similarly to IFS’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BSACIFS
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
58%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
53%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
68%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
63%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
68%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
74%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
73%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
73%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
64%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
70%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
65%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
71%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
67%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
72%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
66%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
66%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
55%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
53%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
69%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
BSAC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
IFS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
EEMX39.410.44
+1.13%
SPDR® MSCI Em Mkts Fssl Ful Free RsrvETF
AGRH25.950.13
+0.52%
iShares Interest Rt Hdg U.S. Aggt Bd ETF
ILS20.20N/A
-0.02%
Brookmont Catastrophic Bond ETF
TMFC67.96-0.19
-0.28%
Motley Fool 100 ETF
DFEN58.42-0.31
-0.53%
Direxion Dly Aerospace&Def Bl 3X ShsETF

BSAC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BSAC has been closely correlated with BCH. These tickers have moved in lockstep 79% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if BSAC jumps, then BCH could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BSAC
1D Price
Change %
BSAC100%
+2.52%
BCH - BSAC
79%
Closely correlated
+2.22%
CIB - BSAC
55%
Loosely correlated
+3.13%
LYG - BSAC
54%
Loosely correlated
-0.68%
IFS - BSAC
54%
Loosely correlated
+0.25%
BAP - BSAC
50%
Loosely correlated
+0.47%
More

IFS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, IFS has been loosely correlated with BAP. These tickers have moved in lockstep 58% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if IFS jumps, then BAP could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To IFS
1D Price
Change %
IFS100%
+0.25%
BAP - IFS
58%
Loosely correlated
+0.47%
BSAC - IFS
54%
Loosely correlated
+2.52%
BCH - IFS
46%
Loosely correlated
+2.22%
BWB - IFS
41%
Loosely correlated
-2.84%
UBFO - IFS
40%
Loosely correlated
-0.63%
More