BRWXF
Price
$0.10
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Dec 3 closing price
Capitalization
25.67M
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
SAND
Price
Loading...
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Loading...
Capitalization
3.45B
70 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

BRWXF vs SAND

Header iconBRWXF vs SAND Comparison
Open Charts BRWXF vs SANDBanner chart's image
BRUNSWICK EXPL
Price$0.10
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$95.86K
Capitalization25.67M
Sandstorm Gold
PriceLoading...
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$14.51M
Capitalization3.45B
BRWXF vs SAND Comparison Chart in %
BRWXF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
SAND
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BRWXF vs. SAND commentary
Dec 05, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BRWXF is a Hold and SAND is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Dec 05, 2025
Stock price -- (BRWXF: $0.10 vs. SAND: $12.12)
Brand notoriety: BRWXF and SAND are both not notable
BRWXF represents the Other Metals/Minerals, while SAND is part of the Precious Metals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BRWXF: 78% vs. SAND: 121%
Market capitalization -- BRWXF: $25.67M vs. SAND: $3.45B
BRWXF [@Other Metals/Minerals] is valued at $25.67M. SAND’s [@Precious Metals] market capitalization is $3.45B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry ranges from $223.12B to $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Precious Metals] industry ranges from $112.48B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry is $2.79B. The average market capitalization across the [@Precious Metals] industry is $3.53B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BRWXF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileSAND’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • BRWXF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • SAND’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, SAND is a better buy in the long-term than BRWXF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BRWXF’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SAND’s TA Score has 1 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BRWXF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
  • SAND’s TA Score: 1 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, both BRWXF and SAND are a bad buy in the short-term.

Price Growth

BRWXF (@Other Metals/Minerals) experienced а -3.30% price change this week, while SAND (@Precious Metals) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Other Metals/Minerals industry was +7.28%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +9.08%, and the average quarterly price growth was +240.19%.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Precious Metals industry was +5.15%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +16.48%, and the average quarterly price growth was +63.31%.

Reported Earning Dates

SAND is expected to report earnings on Feb 12, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Other Metals/Minerals (+7.28% weekly)

The category includes companies that explore for, mine and extract metals, such as copper, diamonds, nickel, cobalt ore, lead, zinc and uranium. BHP, Rio Tinto and Southern Copper Corporation are major players in this space.

@Precious Metals (+5.15% weekly)

The Precious Metals industry is engaged in exploring/mining metals that are considered to be rare and/or have a high economic value. Popular precious metals include gold, platinum and silver - all three of which are largely used in jewelry, art and coinage alongwith having some industrial uses as well. Precious metals used in industrial processes include iridium, (used in specialty alloys), and palladium ( used in electronics and chemical applications). Historically, precious metals have traded at much higher prices than common industrial metals. Newmont Goldcorp Corp, Barrick Gold Corp and Freeport-McMoRan are few of the major precious metals producing companies in the U.S.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SAND($3.45B) has a higher market cap than BRWXF($25.7M). SAND YTD gains are higher at: 117.204 vs. BRWXF (-11.649). SAND has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 145M vs. BRWXF (-7.98M). SAND has more cash in the bank: 14.8M vs. BRWXF (3.33M). BRWXF has less debt than SAND: BRWXF (0) vs SAND (315M). SAND has higher revenues than BRWXF: SAND (194M) vs BRWXF (0).
BRWXFSANDBRWXF / SAND
Capitalization25.7M3.45B1%
EBITDA-7.98M145M-6%
Gain YTD-11.649117.204-10%
P/E RatioN/A101.00-
Revenue0194M-
Total Cash3.33M14.8M22%
Total Debt0315M-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
SAND: Fundamental Ratings
SAND
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
50
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
79
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
54
SMR RATING
1..100
88
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
41
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
10
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BRWXFSAND
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
N/A
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
86%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
76%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
87%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
78%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
88%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
78%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 16 days ago
85%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
88%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
88%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
85%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
66%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
BRWXF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
SAND
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
TSLA446.7417.50
+4.08%
Tesla
BTC.X93527.8050002177.601600
+2.38%
Bitcoin cryptocurrency
GME23.210.40
+1.75%
GameStop Corp
SPY683.892.36
+0.35%
SPDR® S&P 500® ETF
AAPL284.15-2.04
-0.71%
Apple

BRWXF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that BRWXF and NGD have been poorly correlated (+22% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that BRWXF and NGD's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BRWXF
1D Price
Change %
BRWXF100%
-7.55%
NGD - BRWXF
22%
Poorly correlated
-1.99%
FSM - BRWXF
22%
Poorly correlated
-1.85%
EQX - BRWXF
21%
Poorly correlated
-1.01%
AUMBF - BRWXF
21%
Poorly correlated
+1.39%
SAND - BRWXF
20%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

SAND and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SAND has been closely correlated with WPM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 71% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if SAND jumps, then WPM could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SAND
1D Price
Change %
SAND100%
N/A
WPM - SAND
71%
Closely correlated
+0.21%
AEM - SAND
71%
Closely correlated
-0.35%
AGI - SAND
70%
Closely correlated
-1.02%
FNV - SAND
70%
Closely correlated
-0.27%
OR - SAND
70%
Closely correlated
+0.09%
More