BRWXF
Price
$0.09
Change
+$0.01 (+12.50%)
Updated
Sep 23 closing price
Capitalization
20.63M
KTGDF
Price
$0.29
Change
-$0.03 (-9.38%)
Updated
Sep 23 closing price
Capitalization
46.5M
Interact to see
Advertisement

BRWXF vs KTGDF

Header iconBRWXF vs KTGDF Comparison
Open Charts BRWXF vs KTGDFBanner chart's image
BRUNSWICK EXPL
Price$0.09
Change+$0.01 (+12.50%)
Volume$304.64K
Capitalization20.63M
K2 Gold
Price$0.29
Change-$0.03 (-9.38%)
Volume$56.99K
Capitalization46.5M
BRWXF vs KTGDF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
BRWXF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
KTGDF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BRWXF vs. KTGDF commentary
Sep 25, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BRWXF is a Hold and KTGDF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 25, 2025
Stock price -- (BRWXF: $0.09 vs. KTGDF: $0.29)
Brand notoriety: BRWXF and KTGDF are both not notable
BRWXF represents the Other Metals/Minerals, while KTGDF is part of the Precious Metals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BRWXF: 285% vs. KTGDF: 201%
Market capitalization -- BRWXF: $20.63M vs. KTGDF: $46.5M
BRWXF [@Other Metals/Minerals] is valued at $20.63M. KTGDF’s [@Precious Metals] market capitalization is $46.5M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry ranges from $223.12B to $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Precious Metals] industry ranges from $97.6B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry is $2.36B. The average market capitalization across the [@Precious Metals] industry is $3.14B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BRWXF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileKTGDF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • BRWXF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • KTGDF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, KTGDF is a better buy in the long-term than BRWXF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BRWXF’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while KTGDF’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BRWXF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 6 bearish.
  • KTGDF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, KTGDF is a better buy in the short-term than BRWXF.

Price Growth

BRWXF (@Other Metals/Minerals) experienced а +0.37% price change this week, while KTGDF (@Precious Metals) price change was -0.71% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Other Metals/Minerals industry was +3.74%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +14.18%, and the average quarterly price growth was +60.64%.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Precious Metals industry was +5.35%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +30.07%, and the average quarterly price growth was +6063.27%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Other Metals/Minerals (+3.74% weekly)

The category includes companies that explore for, mine and extract metals, such as copper, diamonds, nickel, cobalt ore, lead, zinc and uranium. BHP, Rio Tinto and Southern Copper Corporation are major players in this space.

@Precious Metals (+5.35% weekly)

The Precious Metals industry is engaged in exploring/mining metals that are considered to be rare and/or have a high economic value. Popular precious metals include gold, platinum and silver - all three of which are largely used in jewelry, art and coinage alongwith having some industrial uses as well. Precious metals used in industrial processes include iridium, (used in specialty alloys), and palladium ( used in electronics and chemical applications). Historically, precious metals have traded at much higher prices than common industrial metals. Newmont Goldcorp Corp, Barrick Gold Corp and Freeport-McMoRan are few of the major precious metals producing companies in the U.S.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
KTGDF($46.5M) has a higher market cap than BRWXF($20.6M). KTGDF YTD gains are higher at: 234.960 vs. BRWXF (-21.590). KTGDF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -1.06M vs. BRWXF (-7.98M). BRWXF has more cash in the bank: 3.33M vs. KTGDF (919K). BRWXF (0) and KTGDF (0) have equivalent revenues.
BRWXFKTGDFBRWXF / KTGDF
Capitalization20.6M46.5M44%
EBITDA-7.98M-1.06M754%
Gain YTD-21.590234.960-9%
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
Revenue00-
Total Cash3.33M919K362%
Total Debt0N/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
KTGDF: Fundamental Ratings
KTGDF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
81
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
43
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100
SMR RATING
1..100
94
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
35
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
10

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BRWXFKTGDF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
73%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
81%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
80%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
88%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
86%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
89%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
83%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
87%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
84%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
86%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
78%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 16 days ago
86%
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
75%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
88%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
84%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
74%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
84%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
82%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
BRWXF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
KTGDF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
SDVKY28.010.37
+1.33%
Sandvik AB
USMT4.710.01
+0.17%
US Metro Bancorp
BKAHF0.70N/A
N/A
Bank of Ayudhya Public Co. Ltd.
SRTSF16.96N/A
N/A
Sarantis SA
FEERF0.02N/A
-7.69%
Freeport Resources Inc.

BRWXF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that BRWXF and TORXF have been poorly correlated (+22% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that BRWXF and TORXF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BRWXF
1D Price
Change %
BRWXF100%
+3.90%
TORXF - BRWXF
22%
Poorly correlated
-0.37%
KTGDF - BRWXF
21%
Poorly correlated
-10.32%
AUMBF - BRWXF
21%
Poorly correlated
-2.49%
LGDTF - BRWXF
21%
Poorly correlated
-0.72%
BCEKF - BRWXF
20%
Poorly correlated
+6.19%
More

KTGDF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that KTGDF and CRNLF have been poorly correlated (+25% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that KTGDF and CRNLF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To KTGDF
1D Price
Change %
KTGDF100%
-10.32%
CRNLF - KTGDF
25%
Poorly correlated
N/A
BRWXF - KTGDF
21%
Poorly correlated
+3.90%
AIRRF - KTGDF
20%
Poorly correlated
+9.09%
LMEFF - KTGDF
4%
Poorly correlated
N/A
KOREF - KTGDF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More