Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BRWTX vs FFAFX
BRWTX vs FFAFX Comparison
Open Charts BRWTX vs FFAFX
MFS Blended Research Growth Eq R3
Price$29.22
Change-$0.05 (-0.17%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets517.36M
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer 529F3
Price$89.36
Change+$0.53 (+0.60%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets338.91B
BRWTX vs FFAFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FFAFX has more cash in the bank: 339B vs. BRWTX (517M). FFAFX pays higher dividends than BRWTX: FFAFX (0.54) vs BRWTX (0.11). BRWTX was incepted earlier than FFAFX: BRWTX (10 years) vs FFAFX (5 years). BRWTX (0.68) is less costly to investors than FFAFX (0.35). BRWTX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 46.00 vs. FFAFX (25.00). BRWTX has a lower initial minimum investment than FFAFX: BRWTX (0) vs FFAFX (250). BRWTX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.46 vs. FFAFX (7.34). BRWTX return over 5 years is better than : 54.25 vs. FFAFX (34.69).
| BRWTX | FFAFX | BRWTX / FFAFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.64 | 0.35 | 183% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.68 | 0.35 | 194% |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 5 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 16.401 | 19.205 | 85% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 517M | 339B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.11 | 0.54 | 21% |
| Returns for 1 year | 10.46 | 7.34 | 143% |
| Returns for 3 years | 91.53 | 63.71 | 144% |
| Returns for 5 years | 54.25 | 34.69 | 156% |
| Returns for 10 years | 188.53 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement