Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BRUKX vs RMFCX
BRUKX vs RMFCX Comparison
Open Charts BRUKX vs RMFCX
MFS Blended Research Value Equity R2
Price$16.56
Change+$0.02 (+0.12%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets322.33M
American Funds American Mutual R3
Price$60.48
Change+$0.34 (+0.57%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets111.52B
BRUKX vs RMFCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BRUKX vs. RMFCX commentary
Feb 05, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BRUKX is a Buy and RMFCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 112B vs. BRUKX (322M). RMFCX pays higher dividends than BRUKX: RMFCX (1.24) vs BRUKX (0.96). BRUKX was incepted earlier than RMFCX: BRUKX (10 years) vs RMFCX (24 years). BRUKX (0.94) and RMFCX (0.91) have similar cost to investors . BRUKX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 48.00 vs. RMFCX (30.00). BRUKX has a lower initial minimum investment than RMFCX: BRUKX (0) vs RMFCX (250). RMFCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.88 vs. BRUKX (5.39). RMFCX return over 5 years is better than : 44.43 vs. BRUKX (22.62).
| BRUKX | RMFCX | BRUKX / RMFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.89 | 0.91 | 98% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.94 | 0.91 | 103% |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.086 | 2.822 | 216% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 322M | 112B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.96 | 1.24 | 77% |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.39 | 7.88 | 68% |
| Returns for 3 years | 20.47 | 29.46 | 69% |
| Returns for 5 years | 22.62 | 44.43 | 51% |
| Returns for 10 years | 98.06 | 106.96 | 92% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers