Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BRUKX vs RMFCX
BRUKX vs RMFCX Comparison
Open Charts BRUKX vs RMFCX
MFS Blended Research Value Equity R2
Price$17.06
Change+$0.17 (+1.01%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets316.63M
American Funds American Mutual R3
Price$61.27
Change+$0.38 (+0.62%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets110.43B
BRUKX vs RMFCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BRUKX vs. RMFCX commentary
Sep 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BRUKX is a Buy and RMFCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 110B vs. BRUKX (317M). RMFCX pays higher dividends than BRUKX: RMFCX (1.24) vs BRUKX (1.11). BRUKX was incepted earlier than RMFCX: BRUKX (10 years) vs RMFCX (23 years). BRUKX (1.10) is less costly to investors than RMFCX (0.91). BRUKX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 48.00 vs. RMFCX (31.00). BRUKX has a lower initial minimum investment than RMFCX: BRUKX (0) vs RMFCX (250). RMFCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.41 vs. BRUKX (0.10). RMFCX return over 5 years is better than : 63.20 vs. BRUKX (51.05).
| BRUKX | RMFCX | BRUKX / RMFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.99 | 0.91 | 109% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.10 | 0.91 | 121% |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.265 | 13.245 | 85% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 317M | 110B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.11 | 1.24 | 90% |
| Returns for 1 year | 0.10 | 6.41 | 2% |
| Returns for 3 years | 34.02 | 42.10 | 81% |
| Returns for 5 years | 51.05 | 63.20 | 81% |
| Returns for 10 years | 94.16 | 103.62 | 91% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement