Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BRUKX vs RMEBX
BRUKX vs RMEBX Comparison
Open Charts BRUKX vs RMEBX
MFS Blended Research Value Equity R2
Price$17.11
Change+$0.19 (+1.12%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets312.26M
American Funds American Mutual R2E
Price$62.36
Change+$0.51 (+0.82%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets111.18B
BRUKX vs RMEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BRUKX vs. RMEBX commentary
Oct 21, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BRUKX is a StrongBuy and RMEBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMEBX has more cash in the bank: 111B vs. BRUKX (312M). BRUKX (1.09) and RMEBX (1.05) have matching dividends . BRUKX was incepted earlier than RMEBX: BRUKX (10 years) vs RMEBX (11 years). RMEBX (1.07) is less costly to investors than BRUKX (0.94). BRUKX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 48.00 vs. RMEBX (31.00). BRUKX has a lower initial minimum investment than RMEBX: BRUKX (0) vs RMEBX (250). RMEBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 4.81 vs. BRUKX (-2.52). RMEBX return over 5 years is better than : 55.95 vs. BRUKX (43.76).
| BRUKX | RMEBX | BRUKX / RMEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.89 | 1.07 | 83% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.94 | 1.07 | 88% |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.462 | 13.527 | 85% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 312M | 111B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.09 | 1.05 | 103% |
| Returns for 1 year | -2.52 | 4.81 | -52% |
| Returns for 3 years | 26.46 | 38.19 | 69% |
| Returns for 5 years | 43.76 | 55.95 | 78% |
| Returns for 10 years | 80.61 | 89.36 | 90% |