BRST
Price
$0.03
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Jul 25 closing price
Capitalization
23.18M
MBHCF
Price
$1.00
Change
-$0.26 (-20.63%)
Updated
Jul 5 closing price
Capitalization
9.12M
Interact to see
Advertisement

BRST vs MBHCF

Header iconBRST vs MBHCF Comparison
Open Charts BRST vs MBHCFBanner chart's image
Broad Street Realty
Price$0.03
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$50K
Capitalization23.18M
MBH
Price$1.00
Change-$0.26 (-20.63%)
Volume$100
Capitalization9.12M
BRST vs MBHCF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
BRST
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BRST vs. MBHCF commentary
Jul 28, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BRST is a Hold and MBHCF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 28, 2025
Stock price -- (BRST: $0.03 vs. MBHCF: $1.00)
Brand notoriety: BRST and MBHCF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Real Estate Development industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BRST: 323% vs. MBHCF: 100%
Market capitalization -- BRST: $23.18M vs. MBHCF: $9.12M
BRST [@Real Estate Development] is valued at $23.18M. MBHCF’s [@Real Estate Development] market capitalization is $9.12M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Real Estate Development] industry ranges from $165.37B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Real Estate Development] industry is $5.49B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BRST’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileMBHCF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • BRST’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • MBHCF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, MBHCF is a better buy in the long-term than BRST.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BRST’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • BRST’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 1 bearish.

Price Growth

BRST (@Real Estate Development) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while MBHCF (@Real Estate Development) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Real Estate Development industry was +2.21%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +7.59%, and the average quarterly price growth was +7.20%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Real Estate Development (+2.21% weekly)

Activities range from the renovation and re-lease of existing buildings to the purchase of raw land and the sale of developed land or parcels to others. Demand for land development business is driven by GDP growth, employment rates, interest rates, and access to/cost of capital. For individual companies in this industry, proper cost estimation and successful bidding play critical roles in their profitability. Large companies could potentially have greater access to capital, while smaller companies can specialize in a specific geographic area or market niche. CBRE Group, VICI Properties Inc and Brookfield Property Partners L.P. are some of the large companies in this industry.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BRST($23.2M) has a higher market cap than MBHCF($9.12M). MBHCF YTD gains are higher at: 0.000 vs. BRST (-70.200). BRST has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 13.3M vs. MBHCF (8.07M). BRST has more cash in the bank: 8.5M vs. MBHCF (6.09M). MBHCF has less debt than BRST: MBHCF (45.1M) vs BRST (264M). MBHCF has higher revenues than BRST: MBHCF (109M) vs BRST (36.8M).
BRSTMBHCFBRST / MBHCF
Capitalization23.2M9.12M254%
EBITDA13.3M8.07M165%
Gain YTD-70.2000.000-
P/E RatioN/A3.93-
Revenue36.8M109M34%
Total Cash8.5M6.09M140%
Total Debt264M45.1M585%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BRST: Fundamental Ratings
BRST
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
50
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
62
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100
SMR RATING
1..100
100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
65
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BRSTMBHCF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
N/A
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
72%
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
66%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
27%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
61%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
15%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
68%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
75%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
74%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
BRST
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
IMCDY66.840.22
+0.33%
IMCD Group NV
CZASF0.01N/A
N/A
China Zhengtong Auto Services Holdings Ltd.
JGCCF8.50N/A
N/A
JGC Holdings Corporation
GBCS2.15N/A
N/A
Selectis Health,Inc.
TICJ0.05N/A
N/A
Tritent International Corp.

BRST and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that BRST and NDVLY have been poorly correlated (+20% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that BRST and NDVLY's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BRST
1D Price
Change %
BRST100%
N/A
NDVLY - BRST
20%
Poorly correlated
-12.52%
MBHCF - BRST
6%
Poorly correlated
N/A
UK - BRST
6%
Poorly correlated
+6.12%
SIOLY - BRST
4%
Poorly correlated
-1.96%
ZDPY - BRST
1%
Poorly correlated
-0.49%
More

MBHCF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that MBHCF and BVERS have been poorly correlated (+22% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that MBHCF and BVERS's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MBHCF
1D Price
Change %
MBHCF100%
N/A
BVERS - MBHCF
22%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CNGKY - MBHCF
7%
Poorly correlated
N/A
BRST - MBHCF
6%
Poorly correlated
N/A
OPAD - MBHCF
3%
Poorly correlated
-7.22%
OPEN - MBHCF
3%
Poorly correlated
+4.96%
More