BRSGF
Price
$6.00
Change
+$0.40 (+7.14%)
Updated
Sep 19 closing price
Capitalization
240.88M
GEG
Price
$2.66
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Sep 26 closing price
Capitalization
77.13M
39 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

BRSGF vs GEG

Header iconBRSGF vs GEG Comparison
Open Charts BRSGF vs GEGBanner chart's image
Queens Rd Cap Invt
Price$6.00
Change+$0.40 (+7.14%)
Volume$100
Capitalization240.88M
Great Elm Group
Price$2.66
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$8.47K
Capitalization77.13M
BRSGF vs GEG Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
BRSGF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
GEG
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BRSGF vs. GEG commentary
Sep 28, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BRSGF is a Buy and GEG is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 28, 2025
Stock price -- (BRSGF: $6.00 vs. GEG: $2.66)
Brand notoriety: BRSGF and GEG are both not notable
Both companies represent the Investment Managers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BRSGF: 67% vs. GEG: 2%
Market capitalization -- BRSGF: $240.88M vs. GEG: $77.13M
BRSGF [@Investment Managers] is valued at $240.88M. GEG’s [@Investment Managers] market capitalization is $77.13M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Managers] industry ranges from $179.08B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Managers] industry is $7.43B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BRSGF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileGEG’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • BRSGF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • GEG’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, GEG is a better buy in the long-term than BRSGF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BRSGF’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while GEG’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BRSGF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 1 bearish.
  • GEG’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, BRSGF is a better buy in the short-term than GEG.

Price Growth

BRSGF (@Investment Managers) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while GEG (@Investment Managers) price change was -2.21% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Managers industry was -1.95%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.07%, and the average quarterly price growth was +39.07%.

Reported Earning Dates

GEG is expected to report earnings on Nov 06, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Managers (-1.95% weekly)

Investment Managers manage financial assets and other investments of clients. Management includes designing a short- or long-term strategy for buying/holding and selling of portfolio holdings. It can also include tax services and other aspects of financial planning as well. While it is perceived that the industry is faced with growing competition from robo-advisors/digital platforms and passive/ index-tracking funds, many investors still find value in actively managed in-person services that investment management companies often emphasize on. At the same time, many wealth managers are also incorporating digital initiatives/low cost options in addition to their in-person customized services. Their main sources of revenues are fees as a percentage of assets under management, in addition to a certain portion of clients’ gains from asset appreciation. BlackRock, Inc., Blackstone Group Inc and Brookfield Asset Management are some of the major investment management companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BRSGF($241M) has a higher market cap than GEG($77.1M). GEG has higher P/E ratio than BRSGF: GEG (6.97) vs BRSGF (4.78). GEG YTD gains are higher at: 46.961 vs. BRSGF (13.208). GEG has more cash in the bank: 109M vs. BRSGF (12.9M). BRSGF has less debt than GEG: BRSGF (31.8M) vs GEG (62.6M).
BRSGFGEGBRSGF / GEG
Capitalization241M77.1M313%
EBITDAN/A21M-
Gain YTD13.20846.96128%
P/E Ratio4.786.9769%
RevenueN/A16.3M-
Total Cash12.9M109M12%
Total Debt31.8M62.6M51%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BRSGF vs GEG: Fundamental Ratings
BRSGF
GEG
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5098
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
19
Undervalued
70
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
69100
SMR RATING
1..100
9547
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3441
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
9464
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
6585

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

BRSGF's Valuation (19) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for GEG (70) in the Internet Software Or Services industry. This means that BRSGF’s stock grew somewhat faster than GEG’s over the last 12 months.

BRSGF's Profit vs Risk Rating (69) in the null industry is in the same range as GEG (100) in the Internet Software Or Services industry. This means that BRSGF’s stock grew similarly to GEG’s over the last 12 months.

GEG's SMR Rating (47) in the Internet Software Or Services industry is somewhat better than the same rating for BRSGF (95) in the null industry. This means that GEG’s stock grew somewhat faster than BRSGF’s over the last 12 months.

BRSGF's Price Growth Rating (34) in the null industry is in the same range as GEG (41) in the Internet Software Or Services industry. This means that BRSGF’s stock grew similarly to GEG’s over the last 12 months.

GEG's P/E Growth Rating (64) in the Internet Software Or Services industry is in the same range as BRSGF (94) in the null industry. This means that GEG’s stock grew similarly to BRSGF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BRSGFGEG
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
78%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
47%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
82%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
67%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
47%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
66%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
37%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
70%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
34%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
71%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 13 days ago
66%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
77%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
77%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
39%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
58%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
BRSGF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
GEG
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
GME26.421.15
+4.55%
GameStop Corp
TSLA440.4017.01
+4.02%
Tesla
SPY661.823.77
+0.57%
SPDR® S&P 500® ETF
AAPL255.46-1.41
-0.55%
Apple

BRSGF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BRSGF has been loosely correlated with TGE. These tickers have moved in lockstep 50% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if BRSGF jumps, then TGE could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BRSGF
1D Price
Change %
BRSGF100%
N/A
TGE - BRSGF
50%
Loosely correlated
-1.38%
HTGC - BRSGF
48%
Loosely correlated
+0.05%
CWD - BRSGF
31%
Poorly correlated
-6.18%
ARCC - BRSGF
28%
Poorly correlated
-0.49%
CSWC - BRSGF
26%
Poorly correlated
-0.84%
More

GEG and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that GEG and FRMO have been poorly correlated (+24% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that GEG and FRMO's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To GEG
1D Price
Change %
GEG100%
N/A
FRMO - GEG
24%
Poorly correlated
-0.80%
FDUS - GEG
23%
Poorly correlated
-1.42%
BUR - GEG
22%
Poorly correlated
-0.17%
BRSGF - GEG
22%
Poorly correlated
N/A
OXLCN - GEG
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More