BRSGF
Price
$0.99
Change
-$4.01 (-80.20%)
Updated
Jun 5 closing price
Capitalization
224.46M
ESIFF
Price
$0.29
Change
-$0.02 (-6.45%)
Updated
Jul 2 closing price
Capitalization
7.44M
Interact to see
Advertisement

BRSGF vs ESIFF

Header iconBRSGF vs ESIFF Comparison
Open Charts BRSGF vs ESIFFBanner chart's image
Queens Rd Cap Invt
Price$0.99
Change-$4.01 (-80.20%)
Volume$400
Capitalization224.46M
AI ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE VENTURES
Price$0.29
Change-$0.02 (-6.45%)
Volume$13.31K
Capitalization7.44M
BRSGF vs ESIFF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
BRSGF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
ESIFF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BRSGF vs. ESIFF commentary
Jul 06, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BRSGF is a Hold and ESIFF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 06, 2025
Stock price -- (BRSGF: $0.99 vs. ESIFF: $0.29)
Brand notoriety: BRSGF and ESIFF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Investment Managers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BRSGF: 174% vs. ESIFF: 624%
Market capitalization -- BRSGF: $224.46M vs. ESIFF: $7.44M
BRSGF [@Investment Managers] is valued at $224.46M. ESIFF’s [@Investment Managers] market capitalization is $7.44M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Managers] industry ranges from $124.17B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Managers] industry is $6.16B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BRSGF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileESIFF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • BRSGF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • ESIFF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, ESIFF is a better buy in the long-term than BRSGF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BRSGF’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while ESIFF’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BRSGF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • ESIFF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, BRSGF is a better buy in the short-term than ESIFF.

Price Growth

BRSGF (@Investment Managers) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while ESIFF (@Investment Managers) price change was -10.70% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Managers industry was +2.13%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +6.49%, and the average quarterly price growth was +10.30%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Managers (+2.13% weekly)

Investment Managers manage financial assets and other investments of clients. Management includes designing a short- or long-term strategy for buying/holding and selling of portfolio holdings. It can also include tax services and other aspects of financial planning as well. While it is perceived that the industry is faced with growing competition from robo-advisors/digital platforms and passive/ index-tracking funds, many investors still find value in actively managed in-person services that investment management companies often emphasize on. At the same time, many wealth managers are also incorporating digital initiatives/low cost options in addition to their in-person customized services. Their main sources of revenues are fees as a percentage of assets under management, in addition to a certain portion of clients’ gains from asset appreciation. BlackRock, Inc., Blackstone Group Inc and Brookfield Asset Management are some of the major investment management companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BRSGF($224M) has a higher market cap than ESIFF($7.44M). BRSGF has higher P/E ratio than ESIFF: BRSGF (3.33) vs ESIFF (0.65). ESIFF YTD gains are higher at: 9.364 vs. BRSGF (-81.321). ESIFF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -617.62K vs. BRSGF (-30.08M). BRSGF has more cash in the bank: 12.9M vs. ESIFF (6.81M). ESIFF has less debt than BRSGF: ESIFF (260K) vs BRSGF (367K). ESIFF has higher revenues than BRSGF: ESIFF (5.18M) vs BRSGF (-26.62M).
BRSGFESIFFBRSGF / ESIFF
Capitalization224M7.44M3,010%
EBITDA-30.08M-617.62K4,870%
Gain YTD-81.3219.364-868%
P/E Ratio3.330.65516%
Revenue-26.62M5.18M-514%
Total Cash12.9M6.81M190%
Total Debt367K260K141%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BRSGF vs ESIFF: Fundamental Ratings
BRSGF
ESIFF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
28
Undervalued
90
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10065
SMR RATING
1..100
9399
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
9843
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
9571
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

BRSGF's Valuation (28) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for ESIFF (90). This means that BRSGF’s stock grew somewhat faster than ESIFF’s over the last 12 months.

ESIFF's Profit vs Risk Rating (65) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for BRSGF (100). This means that ESIFF’s stock grew somewhat faster than BRSGF’s over the last 12 months.

BRSGF's SMR Rating (93) in the null industry is in the same range as ESIFF (99). This means that BRSGF’s stock grew similarly to ESIFF’s over the last 12 months.

ESIFF's Price Growth Rating (43) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for BRSGF (98). This means that ESIFF’s stock grew somewhat faster than BRSGF’s over the last 12 months.

ESIFF's P/E Growth Rating (71) in the null industry is in the same range as BRSGF (95). This means that ESIFF’s stock grew similarly to BRSGF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BRSGFESIFF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
55%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
74%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
51%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
83%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
47%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
80%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
36%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
81%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
48%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
87%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
81%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
63%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
84%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
BRSGF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
ESIFF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
SPY625.344.89
+0.79%
SPDR® S&P 500® ETF
AAPL213.551.11
+0.52%
Apple
BTC.X108231.180000196.835940
+0.18%
Bitcoin cryptocurrency
TSLA315.35-0.30
-0.10%
Tesla
GME23.59-0.36
-1.50%
GameStop Corp

BRSGF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BRSGF has been loosely correlated with HTGC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 48% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if BRSGF jumps, then HTGC could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BRSGF
1D Price
Change %
BRSGF100%
N/A
HTGC - BRSGF
48%
Loosely correlated
+0.11%
ARCC - BRSGF
28%
Poorly correlated
+1.63%
CSWC - BRSGF
26%
Poorly correlated
+1.20%
BXSL - BRSGF
26%
Poorly correlated
+1.23%
FSK - BRSGF
26%
Poorly correlated
+0.38%
More

ESIFF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that ESIFF and EQBBF have been poorly correlated (+6% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that ESIFF and EQBBF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To ESIFF
1D Price
Change %
ESIFF100%
N/A
EQBBF - ESIFF
6%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CNDCF - ESIFF
5%
Poorly correlated
N/A
DTSRF - ESIFF
3%
Poorly correlated
+1.20%
CYMBF - ESIFF
1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
BRSGF - ESIFF
-0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More