Advertisement
BRRLY vs BYCBF
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BRRLY is a Hold and BYCBF is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
BRRLY’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileBYCBF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
- BRRLY’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
- BYCBF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
BRRLY’s TA Score shows that 7 TA indicator(s) are bullish while BYCBF’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
- BRRLY’s TA Score: 7 bullish, 3 bearish.
- BYCBF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
Price Growth
BRRLY (@Food: Specialty/Candy) experienced а +13.28% price change this week, while BYCBF (@Food: Specialty/Candy) price change was +17.50% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Food: Specialty/Candy industry was +2.20%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -2.72%, and the average quarterly price growth was +14.20%.
Industries' Descriptions
@Food: Specialty/Candy (+2.20% weekly)A specialty/candy manufacturer specializes in one or more of the following: chocolate, candies, pasta, condiments, seasonings, among other items. Hershey Company, McCormick & Company and J.M. Smucker Company are some of the major firms in this segment. Demand for this industry’s products comes from both institutions/restaurants as well as households.
| BRRLY | BYCBF | BRRLY / BYCBF | |
| Capitalization | 8.58B | 8.58B | 100% |
| EBITDA | 728M | 728M | 100% |
| Gain YTD | 17.110 | -1.611 | -1,062% |
| P/E Ratio | 36.99 | 36.67 | 101% |
| Revenue | 13B | 13B | 100% |
| Total Cash | 1.61B | 1.61B | 100% |
| Total Debt | 7.72B | 7.72B | 100% |
BRRLY | BYCBF | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 76 | 91 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 42 Fair valued | 36 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 96 | 96 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 41 | 52 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 56 | 83 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | 65 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
BYCBF's Valuation (36) in the null industry is in the same range as BRRLY (42). This means that BYCBF’s stock grew similarly to BRRLY’s over the last 12 months.
BYCBF's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as BRRLY (100). This means that BYCBF’s stock grew similarly to BRRLY’s over the last 12 months.
BYCBF's SMR Rating (96) in the null industry is in the same range as BRRLY (96). This means that BYCBF’s stock grew similarly to BRRLY’s over the last 12 months.
BRRLY's Price Growth Rating (41) in the null industry is in the same range as BYCBF (52). This means that BRRLY’s stock grew similarly to BYCBF’s over the last 12 months.
BRRLY's P/E Growth Rating (56) in the null industry is in the same range as BYCBF (83). This means that BRRLY’s stock grew similarly to BYCBF’s over the last 12 months.
| BRRLY | BYCBF | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 50% | 3 days ago 48% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 51% | 3 days ago 41% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 55% | 3 days ago 48% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 47% | 3 days ago 53% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 41% | 3 days ago 44% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 45% | 3 days ago 49% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 8 days ago 69% | N/A |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 11 days ago 76% | N/A |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 48% | 3 days ago 33% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 50% | 3 days ago 41% |
Advertisement
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| FEMR | 32.21 | 0.03 | +0.09% |
| Fidelity Enhanced Emerging Markets ETF | |||
| JPIB | 48.96 | 0.03 | +0.06% |
| JPMorgan International Bond Opps ETF | |||
| MVPA | 32.52 | 0.01 | +0.03% |
| Miller Value Ptnrs Appreciation ETF | |||
| BULD | 26.29 | N/A | N/A |
| Pacer BlueStar Engineering the Fut ETF | |||
| SMB | 17.32 | -0.01 | -0.09% |
| VanEck Short Muni ETF | |||
BYCBF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that BYCBF and CELV have been poorly correlated (+20% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that BYCBF and CELV's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To BYCBF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BYCBF | 100% | N/A | ||
| CELV - BYCBF | 20% Poorly correlated | +36.36% | ||
| ASBFY - BYCBF | 12% Poorly correlated | -1.05% | ||
| BABB - BYCBF | 6% Poorly correlated | +0.96% | ||
| BRRLY - BYCBF | 6% Poorly correlated | -0.54% | ||
| CFEIY - BYCBF | 0% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
More | ||||