BRRLY
Price
$15.20
Change
+$0.35 (+2.36%)
Updated
Oct 16 closing price
Capitalization
8.3B
BYCBF
Price
$1471.70
Change
-$9.95 (-0.67%)
Updated
Oct 15 closing price
Capitalization
8.3B
Interact to see
Advertisement

BRRLY vs BYCBF

Header iconBRRLY vs BYCBF Comparison
Open Charts BRRLY vs BYCBFBanner chart's image
Barry Callebaut AG
Price$15.20
Change+$0.35 (+2.36%)
Volume$42.59K
Capitalization8.3B
Barry Callebaut AG
Price$1471.70
Change-$9.95 (-0.67%)
Volume$2
Capitalization8.3B
BRRLY vs BYCBF Comparison Chart in %
BRRLY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
BYCBF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BRRLY vs. BYCBF commentary
Oct 17, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BRRLY is a Hold and BYCBF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Oct 17, 2025
Stock price -- (BRRLY: $15.19 vs. BYCBF: $1471.70)
Brand notoriety: BRRLY and BYCBF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Food: Specialty/Candy industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BRRLY: 123% vs. BYCBF: 8%
Market capitalization -- BRRLY: $8.3B vs. BYCBF: $8.3B
BRRLY [@Food: Specialty/Candy] is valued at $8.3B. BYCBF’s [@Food: Specialty/Candy] market capitalization is $8.3B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Food: Specialty/Candy] industry ranges from $79.71B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Food: Specialty/Candy] industry is $15.62B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BRRLY’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileBYCBF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • BRRLY’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • BYCBF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, both BRRLY and BYCBF are a bad buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BRRLY’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while BYCBF’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BRRLY’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • BYCBF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 2 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, BYCBF is a better buy in the short-term than BRRLY.

Price Growth

BRRLY (@Food: Specialty/Candy) experienced а +4.61% price change this week, while BYCBF (@Food: Specialty/Candy) price change was +2.74% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Food: Specialty/Candy industry was +0.31%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.60%, and the average quarterly price growth was +13.67%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Food: Specialty/Candy (+0.31% weekly)

A specialty/candy manufacturer specializes in one or more of the following: chocolate, candies, pasta, condiments, seasonings, among other items. Hershey Company, McCormick & Company and J.M. Smucker Company are some of the major firms in this segment. Demand for this industry’s products comes from both institutions/restaurants as well as households.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BRRLY($8.3B) and BYCBF($8.3B) have the same market capitalization . BRRLY (46.49) and BYCBF (45.03) have similar P/E ratio . BRRLY YTD gains are higher at: 18.475 vs. BYCBF (9.772). BRRLY (728M) and BYCBF (728M) have comparable annual earnings (EBITDA) . BRRLY (1.61B) and BYCBF (1.61B) have equal amount of cash in the bank . BRRLY (7.72B) and BYCBF (7.72B) have identical debt. BRRLY (13B) and BYCBF (13B) have equivalent revenues.
BRRLYBYCBFBRRLY / BYCBF
Capitalization8.3B8.3B100%
EBITDA728M728M100%
Gain YTD18.4759.772189%
P/E Ratio46.4945.03103%
Revenue13B13B100%
Total Cash1.61B1.61B100%
Total Debt7.72B7.72B100%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BRRLY vs BYCBF: Fundamental Ratings
BRRLY
BYCBF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
2299
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
43
Fair valued
40
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100100
SMR RATING
1..100
100100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
8787
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
1115
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
30n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

BYCBF's Valuation (40) in the null industry is in the same range as BRRLY (43). This means that BYCBF’s stock grew similarly to BRRLY’s over the last 12 months.

BYCBF's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as BRRLY (100). This means that BYCBF’s stock grew similarly to BRRLY’s over the last 12 months.

BYCBF's SMR Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as BRRLY (100). This means that BYCBF’s stock grew similarly to BRRLY’s over the last 12 months.

BYCBF's Price Growth Rating (87) in the null industry is in the same range as BRRLY (87). This means that BYCBF’s stock grew similarly to BRRLY’s over the last 12 months.

BRRLY's P/E Growth Rating (11) in the null industry is in the same range as BYCBF (15). This means that BRRLY’s stock grew similarly to BYCBF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BRRLYBYCBF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
67%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
64%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
44%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
55%
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
47%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
49%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
40%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
44%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
43%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
41%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
30%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 29 days ago
77%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
42%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
60%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
31%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
BRRLY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
BYCBF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
TPLS25.860.10
+0.37%
Thornburg Core Plus Bond ETF
MTBA50.710.10
+0.20%
Simplify MBS ETF
EWV26.76-0.19
-0.70%
ProShares UltraShort MSCI Japan
SPBC44.13-0.41
-0.92%
Simplify US Equity PLUS Bitcoin Stgy ETF
XJH43.17-0.51
-1.18%
iShares ESG Select Scrn S&P Mid-Cap ETF

BRRLY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that BRRLY and AJINF have been poorly correlated (+21% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that BRRLY and AJINF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BRRLY
1D Price
Change %
BRRLY100%
+2.39%
AJINF - BRRLY
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
FPAFF - BRRLY
20%
Poorly correlated
+2.66%
BABB - BRRLY
16%
Poorly correlated
+2.08%
BYCBF - BRRLY
6%
Poorly correlated
N/A
BMBOY - BRRLY
4%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

BYCBF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that BYCBF and CELV have been poorly correlated (+20% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that BYCBF and CELV's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BYCBF
1D Price
Change %
BYCBF100%
N/A
CELV - BYCBF
20%
Poorly correlated
+0.05%
ASBFY - BYCBF
12%
Poorly correlated
+1.79%
BABB - BYCBF
6%
Poorly correlated
+2.08%
BRRLY - BYCBF
6%
Poorly correlated
+2.39%
CFEIY - BYCBF
0%
Poorly correlated
+0.10%
More