It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
BRQSF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileZS’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
BRQSF’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while ZS’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
BRQSF (@Computer Communications) experienced а -18.87% price change this week, while ZS (@Computer Communications) price change was -1.03% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Computer Communications industry was +1.85%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +6.53%, and the average quarterly price growth was +50.70%.
ZS is expected to report earnings on Nov 26, 2025.
Computer communications industry develops technology that allows computing devices to exchange data with each other using connections/data links between nodes. Common types of computer network include Cloud (IAN), Internet, Wide (WAN, Local (LAN)/Wireless(WLAN) etc. The industry is an ever-more important part of technology, and is set to become even bigger as the Internet of Things (IoT) rapidly forays into the various aspects of our lives. Cisco Systems, Inc., Palo Alto Networks, Inc. and Arista Networks, Inc., Fortinet, Inc. are some of the major computer communications companies.
BRQSF | ZS | BRQSF / ZS | |
Capitalization | 4.23M | 42.7B | 0% |
EBITDA | N/A | 101M | - |
Gain YTD | -41.514 | 51.987 | -80% |
P/E Ratio | 0.27 | N/A | - |
Revenue | N/A | 2.55B | - |
Total Cash | N/A | 3.01B | - |
Total Debt | N/A | 1.23B | - |
BRQSF | ZS | ||
---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 50 | 50 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 53 Fair valued | 82 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 64 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 100 | 93 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 78 | 48 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 95 | 100 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 90 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
BRQSF's Valuation (53) in the Miscellaneous industry is in the same range as ZS (82) in the Packaged Software industry. This means that BRQSF’s stock grew similarly to ZS’s over the last 12 months.
ZS's Profit vs Risk Rating (64) in the Packaged Software industry is somewhat better than the same rating for BRQSF (100) in the Miscellaneous industry. This means that ZS’s stock grew somewhat faster than BRQSF’s over the last 12 months.
ZS's SMR Rating (93) in the Packaged Software industry is in the same range as BRQSF (100) in the Miscellaneous industry. This means that ZS’s stock grew similarly to BRQSF’s over the last 12 months.
ZS's Price Growth Rating (48) in the Packaged Software industry is in the same range as BRQSF (78) in the Miscellaneous industry. This means that ZS’s stock grew similarly to BRQSF’s over the last 12 months.
BRQSF's P/E Growth Rating (95) in the Miscellaneous industry is in the same range as ZS (100) in the Packaged Software industry. This means that BRQSF’s stock grew similarly to ZS’s over the last 12 months.
BRQSF | ZS | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 4 days ago82% | 4 days ago90% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 4 days ago90% | 4 days ago81% |
MACD ODDS (%) | 4 days ago85% | 4 days ago87% |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 4 days ago82% | 4 days ago77% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 4 days ago90% | 4 days ago75% |
Advances ODDS (%) | 27 days ago80% | 12 days ago79% |
Declines ODDS (%) | 4 days ago90% | 5 days ago79% |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 4 days ago90% | 4 days ago74% |
Aroon ODDS (%) | N/A | 4 days ago77% |
A.I.dvisor tells us that BRQSF and FLYW have been poorly correlated (+21% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that BRQSF and FLYW's prices will move in lockstep.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To BRQSF | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
BRQSF | 100% | -5.74% | ||
FLYW - BRQSF | 21% Poorly correlated | -0.46% | ||
ZS - BRQSF | 8% Poorly correlated | +2.22% | ||
BB - BRQSF | 5% Poorly correlated | +2.11% | ||
BAND - BRQSF | 5% Poorly correlated | +0.19% | ||
FTFT - BRQSF | 3% Poorly correlated | +8.74% | ||
More |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ZS has been closely correlated with CRWD. These tickers have moved in lockstep 68% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if ZS jumps, then CRWD could also see price increases.